Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles
Title: FBI admits that ALL its forensic experts exaggerated hair evidence at every criminal trial for nearly 20 years
Source:
Daily Mail Online
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... -criminal-trials-20-years.html
Published: Apr 18, 2015
Author: Wills Robinson
Post Date: 2015-04-18 21:29:54 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1604
Comments: 5
The FBI and Justice Department have admitted forensic examiners from a DNA unit gave flawed evidence at nearly all United States criminal trials spanning 20 years. It has been reported that 26 employees in the agency's microscopic hair comparison laboratory overstated forensic matches so they favored prosecutors in the 1980s and 1990s. Research involving the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project say that 95 per cent of 268 trials reviewed had been impacted. The FBI and Justice Department have admitted forensic examiners from a DNA unit gave flawed evidence at nearly all criminal trials spanning 20 years The Washington Post reported that of the 200 convictions affected, 32 defendants were sentenced to death - 14 of which have since been executed or died behind bars. Those who are still alive have been sent letters explaining the errors and how they can used further DNA testing to prove the evidence. The mistakes do not automatically prove the convict's innocence. Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the Innocence Project, told the Post: 'The FBI’s three-decade use of microscopic hair analysis to incriminate defendants was a complete disaster. 'We need an exhaustive investigation that looks at how the FBI, state governments that relied on examiners trained by the FBI and the courts allowed this to happen and why it wasn’t stopped much sooner.' In a statement the FBI said they were committed to notifying defendants of past discrepancies and make sure 'justice is done in every instance'. They added: '[We] are also committed to ensuring the accuracy of future hair analysis, as well as the application of all disciplines of forensic science.' Of the 200 convictions affected by the errors, 32 defendants were sentenced to death - 14 of which have since been executed or died behind bars (file picture) The FBI stopped its review of convictions in August 2013 after the initial troubling findings but resumed this month after at the Justice Department's orders. A report from the department's inspector general found that the FBI and Justice Department didn't move quickly enough to identify the cases handled by 13 FBI crime lab examiners whose work was found to be flawed, meaning defendants sometimes were never notified that their convictions may have been based on bad science. It took almost five years for the FBI to identify the more than 60 death-row defendents whose cases required further examination, and during that time at least three were executed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
Under the Law of God, whoever in a criminal trial gives false testimony is to be punished himself with the punishment faced by the accused. Lab technicians who falsify evidence in death penalty cases would all be put to death were we following God's law. We're not, so these miscreants won't receive their punishment on this side of the grave. But when they die and open their eyes on the other side, they have a massive burden of sin, for which they will be thrown into the flames.
One can only hope. But I'd still like to see a little punishment meted out in this plane of existence.
There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't
Don't hold your breath.
I doubt they were convicted on simple hair comparison. If so, then OJ should have been found guilty.
If the prosecution didn't think it helped their case, they wouldn't have used it. On the other hand, hair comparison evidence could easily be exculpatory unless the expert witness lies.
There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
But when they die and open their eyes on the other side, they have a massive burden of sin, for which they will be thrown into the flames.
#3. To: cranky (#2)
"But I'd still like to see a little punishment meted out in this plane of existence."
#4. To: cranky (#0)
"meaning defendants sometimes were never notified that their convictions may have been based on bad science."
#5. To: misterwhite (#4)
I doubt they were convicted on simple hair comparison.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]