[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: New media outrage: Rand Paul takes one last question, answers it, leaves A nice demonstration of how the left-medias narrative sausage gets made. The headline at TPM: My goodness. Rand got testy with another reporter, to the point where he actually stormed off? Maybe Megyn Kelly was right to complain about how thin-skinned he seems. This certainly sounds problematic. .@RandPaul refuses to answer @PaulLewis' question in the @GuardianUS periscope interview, abruptly walked off AS STAFFERS TURN OFF LIGHTS Katherine Krueger (@kath_krueger) April 10, 2015 Good lord. Theyre literally blacking out the media to shield him from tough questions. No wonder Politico is aghast about his particularly prickly demeanor. Now watch the clip and see what the fuss is about. According to Paul, it wasnt him or his staff that shut the lights; it was CNNs producers, who were eager to get him to sit down for a scheduled interview with Dana Bash. He was on a tight deadline, he agreed to take one more question, he took it, and thats that. And the question that got cut off, citing a poll showing most white Republicans opposing him on sentencing reform, wouldnt have been a tough one for him to spin. You can spitball how he might have answered it yourself: Maybe one reason Republicans feel the way they do is because no one in our party has given them an alternate viewpoint on that issue in many years. My strength is that I can make our tent bigger; even Republicans who disagree with me about something might reconsider if they think my platform can build a durable conservative majority. Reminding Rand Paul that his views are out of the Republican mainstream is like reminding Barack Obama that hes the first black president. Trust me, hes well aware. Mollie Hemingway, having digested days worth of whining from the media about Pauls snippiness, reminds some very special snowflakes that theyre less special than they think: And Paul didnt even do that here. He responded within the parameters: One last question. He took it and left. But the narrative, that hes prickly with journalists and that you should give even the tiniest wet crap about that fact, somehow remains. Exit question via John Ekdahl: Why isnt everyone having an emotional breakdown about Rand being rude to a male reporter? Poster Comment: So Scott Walker is an idiot and Rand Paul is "snippy" with women.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: TooConservative (#0)
The reporter should have said "I have two more questions". Or "I have six more questions". Too bad, dipshit.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|