[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Computers-Hacking
See other Computers-Hacking Articles

Title: Facebook accused of tracking all users even if they delete accounts, ask never to be followed
Source: The Independent via Drudge
URL Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s ... r-to-be-followed-10146631.html
Published: Mar 31, 2015
Author: Andrew Griffin
Post Date: 2015-03-31 15:28:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: Facebook
Views: 2551
Comments: 14

A new report claims that Facebook secretly installs tracking cookies on users’ computers, allowing them to follow users around the internet even after they’ve left the website, deleted their account and requested to be no longer followed.

Academic researchers said that the report showed that the company was breaking European law with its tracking policies. The law requires that users are told if their computers are receiving cookies except for specific circumstances.

Facebook’s tracking — which it does so that it can tailor advertising — involves putting cookies or small pieces of software on users’ computers, so that they can then be followed around the internet. Such technology is used by almost every website, but European law requires that users are told if they are being given cookies or being tracked. Companies don’t have to tell users if the cookies are required to connect to a service or if they are needed to give the user information that they have specifically requested.

But Facebook’s tracking policy allows it to track users if they have simply been to a page on the company’s domain, even if they weren’t logged in. That includes pages for brands or events, which users can see whether or not they have an account.

Facebook disputes the accusations of the report, it told The Independent.

“This report contains factual inaccuracies,” a Facebook spokesperson said. “The authors have never contacted us, nor sought to clarify any assumptions upon which their report is based. Neither did they invite our comment on the report before making it public.

“We have explained in detail the inaccuracies in the earlier draft report (after it was published) directly to the Belgian DPA, who we understand commissioned it, and have offered to meet with them to explain why it is incorrect, but they have declined to meet or engage with us. However, we remain willing to engage with them and hope they will be prepared to update their work in due course”.

The report does not have any legal standing, and was written by independent academics.

With respect to its European data, Facebook is regulated by the Irish Data Protection Commissioner, who checks that Facebook is acting within the EU’s Data Protection Directive. As part of that regulation, Facebook is regularly audited.

Facebook has a page on its site that gives users’ information about cookies and how they are used on the network. The company makes clear that cookies are used for the purposes of advertising and other functions, and that users can opt out of such tracking if they wish to.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#4. To: TooConservative (#0)

Uh oh. Facehook could end up in heap big trouble in Europe. Better get out the checkbook.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-03-31   20:25:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

The EU actually does much better at protecting its consumers from Microsoft and Google and Facebook. They have real teeth.

If only we followed suit but our legislators are too bought off or too stupid to grasp the tech essentials.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-31   21:16:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TooConservative (#5)

Yep. The key concept in Europe is PRIVACY, and the most ferocious avatars of privacy of all are the French.

In France, personal e-mails, done on a corporate computer, are personal: the employer commits a CRIME f the employer opens and reads private e-mail.

Privacy is pretty absolute.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-03-31   21:39:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#7)

Privacy is pretty absolute.

And not just a code word for sodomy and abortion which seems to be the notion of USSC.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-01   4:10:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative (#8)

Privacy is pretty absolute.

And not just a code word for sodomy and abortion which seems to be the notion of USSC.

In France, it's a code word for: "I can have an affair and its illegal for you to spy on me or tell anybody."

Truth is a defense against slander, but it is no defense against "atteinte a la vie privee". If you obtain knowledge by penetrating into private life, you've committed a crime by the fact that you have penetrated into private life, and the knowledge you have obtained is the proof of the crime you have committed.

It's not the English slander law, under which "the greater the truth, the greater the slander" - that's ridiculous. The English purpose has always been to shield powerful people from exposure of their actions, to protect the powerful from revelation of what they are doing.

That's not the French purpose. The French purpose is not aimed at protecting people from getting caught insider trading. It is to punish people who intrude into other people's business. The focus is different. Protection isn't the issue, it is active, assertive punishment of spies, private investigators, busybodies and nosy people.

French people like to be left alone. So, if you rent out the hotel room overlooking a gated, hedged villa, and you take a picture of the scenery out of that window, including the villa, you have done nothing wrong.

But, if you rent out the hotel room and sit in there with a telephoto lens and snap pictures of the celebrities enjoying dinner with their girlfriends on the veranda of the private villa, you have committed a crime. You can publish the photos, but if you do, you and the paper that printed it will be prosecuted, fined and owe damages for "attack on private life".

Basically, if you point a camera through somebody's hedge or windows, or follow him around to photograph him with his mistress at dinner at Le Cirque, you're a criminal. The public does not have the right to know the private lives of other people, and the people who go to collect the "gotcha" information on other people's private lives are criminals.

Likewise, employers. Employers do not need to know their employees private lives, and have no reason to be reading their private e-mail. The fact that it's on the company server doesn't change that.

In America, there is this thing called broad discovery, whereby if I sue you, I can demand that you produce to me all of your documents so that I can go through your stuff to find evidence against you and in my favor.

To the French, this is absurd reversal of the whole concept of justice and privacy. If you sue me, YOU have to prove it. I don't have to prove the case FOR you, and you don't have the right to MY papers so that you can make ME testify against myself! That is absurd. For public companies, there is some discovery, to the public prosecutors. but that only goes so far. It does not permit the employer to go rifling through people's private e-mails. Private is private, and privacy is more important than enforcement of rules or catching people.

I think that this is a legacy of the Reign of Terror and the Nazi Occupation. The French endured two periods of being spied upon in their personal lives for the purposes of reducing them to servitude. So they passed laws to make spying on personal life a crime.

It's a reversal of assumptions: it is far more important to repress busybodies than it is to repress adultery. That's the French mindset.

Now, interestingly, the French don't limit the state spying on e-mails and other things for the purposes of national security. Getting blown up or having the country overthrown is bad, so the state can do that. But that's for that purpose: national security, and done by the security types. It doesn't spill over into regular civilian judicial actions and lawsuits. The purpose of State espionage is to protect the country from attack, NOT to give private litigants an edge over each other in court.

Of course there ARE private investigators in France, and they DO photograph cheating spouses and hand over the evidence to the other spouse, who then can privately retaliate in whatever way s/he chooses (usually by having an affair of his/her own, more rarely, by divorce), but it's not evidence as such to hand to the court or the public to say "See! See!" Because if you do that, then you have attacked the private life of the mistress or boyfriend, and that's a crime.

You can get out of the relationship, but if you decide to use the media to go Pearl Harbor on somebody by exposing his/her private life, you're going to be hit with fines and you may go to jail.

Different mentality. I prefer it. Americans are so exposed to attack from all sectors. Employers can take action against them for anything, including what they do on their Facebook accounts at home. My view is that if the employer wants 24 hours of control, he has to pay 24 hours of salary. The French view is that employers who look at their employees private stuff are criminals.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-04-01   7:35:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

#10. To: Vicomte13 (#9)

I prefer more privacy than less. The sheer spectacle made of the lives of celebs and pols is ridiculous. It feeds some very base and ugly urges.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-01 08:19:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com