Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles
Title: Officer charged with killing unarmed driver lying facedown (expired inspection sticker)
Source:
Yahoo News / AP
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/pa-officer-ch ... narmed-motorist-165424205.html
Published: Mar 26, 2015
Author: MARK SCOLFORO
Post Date: 2015-03-26 21:01:20 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 8293
Comments: 38
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania police officer was charged Tuesday with criminal homicide after investigators concluded she shot an unarmed motorist in the back as he lay facedown after a traffic stop over an expired inspection sticker. Authorities accused Hummelstown police Officer Lisa J. Mearkle of shooting 59-year-old David Kassick twice on Feb. 2 without legal justification. She was released on $250,000 bail. Her attorney, Brian Perry, said Mearkle acted in self-defense, and he warned the case could cause police officers to hesitate in high-pressure situations. "She felt like she had to do what she did," Perry said. "This person was being commanded, begged, 'show me your hands,' and he kept going to his waist." Authorities said Mearkle had attempted to pull over Kassick for expired inspection and emissions stickers before he sped away. She caught up to Kassick near his sister's home where he had been living for a short time. He got out and ran before Mearkle incapacitated him with a stun gun, held in her left hand. He was on the ground when she shot him twice in the back with the gun in her right hand, police said. Mearkle, 36, told investigators she fired because he would not show her his hands and she thought he was reaching into his jacket for a gun. Perry said she did not know Kassick before the shooting. The offense of criminal homicide encompasses a range of charges, from misdemeanor involuntary manslaughter to felony first-degree murder. Prosecutors often narrow the charge later in the process, about the time when defendants are formally arraigned. The stun gun contained a camera that recorded audio and video from portions of the encounter, and District Attorney Ed Marsico called it the strongest evidence in the case. He said it appeared Kassick had been trying to remove the stun-gun probe from his back. "At the time Officer Mearkle fires both rounds from her pistol, the video clearly depicts Kassick lying on the snow covered lawn with his face toward the ground," according to the arrest affidavit. "Furthermore, at the time the rounds are fired nothing can be seen in either of Kassick's hands, nor does he point or direct anything toward Officer Mearkle." Marsico said Mearkle waited 4 seconds between the first and second shots, and afterward performed CPR. He called the shooting "a tragedy for all involved." The district attorney said a syringe was found near Kassick's body, and alcohol and unspecified drugs were found in his system. Lawyers for Kassick's family and estate issued a statement calling the charges "a substantial step toward closure" after what they described as a horrifying tragedy. They said he had worked as a Teamsters union laborer and struggled with addiction. "Mr. Kassick is now dead as a result of a traffic stop, a routine traffic stop," said one of the family's attorneys, Christopher Slusser. "He should not be dead. He should not have died as a result of that traffic stop. And the manner in which he was shot — you can infer from that what you will." Hummelstown Police Chief Charles M. Dowell did not respond to a message seeking comment, but his department issued a news release that said it had cooperated fully, calling the matter "an extremely difficult case for all involved." "We are servants of justice and must now allow the judicial process to conduct a fair and impartial review of the allegations that have been presented," the news release stated. Perry said Mearkle has been on the force for 15 years. She is married to a state trooper and has young children at home, he said. She was expected to be under electronic monitoring. Related Video:
Hummelstown, Pa., Police officer Lisa Mearkle walks into District Judge Lowell A. Witmer's office in West Hanover Twp., Tuesday, March 24, 2015, for her preliminary arraignment in connection with the shooting death of David Kassick during a traffic stop in February 2015. She was charged with criminal homicide, and is being held without bail over the Feb. 2 shooting. Investigators say Mearkle had incapacitated Kassick with a stun gun and he was on the ground when she shot him twice. She told investigators she thought he was reaching into his jacket for a gun.(AP Photo/PennLive.com, Mark Pynes)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
#8. To: hondo68 (#0)
Mr. Kassick turned this routine traffic stop into much more than that. Forget the expired inspection and emissions stickers. We got fleeing and eluding, resisting arrest, DWI, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Run away from the cops and bad things happen. F**k him.
What? Are we living in a prison that is called a nation?
Nope. We are living in a nation bound by the rule of law. Laws which were approved, by the way, by the people themselves. The great thing is that we can change the laws and make fleeing and eluding, resisting arrest, DWI, and possession of drug paraphernalia legal. You want that?
Actually, yes I do. Most of what you stated harms no one. DWI should be a crime, and enforced but only within the confines of actual police work. Like observation and instinct, not with forced blood draws. Fleeing and eluding capture after a crime such as murder, rape, robbery or a traffic accident I can see a reason to use force, even deadly force. To shoot someone because they didn't have their car inspected, or a tag is missing? Not so much. Why do we as citizens always ask and are required to answer the question, "am I willing to die for it"? Or "am I willing to take a life for it"? I am assuming most people, including me and you would not kill someone for backing over our flower pots. For poisoning the dog, even though we may entertain a notion of it. No, for a normal person to execute someone, it would have to be a large offense. Like a burglar at night in the home. Catching a man raping your wife or children. Someone assaulting you, a loved one or an innocent. We have a government, with the officials charged with enforcing laws and keeping order. They do step out of line. They take our liberty from us in many different ways. They enslave us by borrowing money in our name that our children will pay back. Do the vast majority of citizens arm themselves and begin fighting back? No, they do not because the threshold of what they would kill or die for has not been reached. What kind of man or woman would die for the "blasphemy" of expired tabs? Cops won't, but they will kill for it. They will kill and assault someone just for giving them a bad attitude. They killed a man for the heinous crime of selling untaxed cigarettes. They kill because they have broken into the wrong house serving a warrant for someone living next door. They kill kids holding a plastic gun, or a wii remote. There is something wrong with a judicial/police system that is so out of touch with the average normal guy. They kill for offenses that are NOTHING. The natural nature of them has been overridden. They are mad with power, they are drunk with responsibility. Would you actually kill someone for running away from you? Cops do, cops will and it has nothing to do with "protect and serve".
DWI should be a crime? Wow! Who is being hurt? Where's the harm? The damage? Granted, they MAY harm someone. But how is driving while impaired a crime? The chances are very good they'll make it home with no problem whatsoever. You kinda scare me, wanting to punish people for something they might do.
There are no replies to Comment # 38. End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"Mr. Kassick is now dead as a result of a traffic stop, a routine traffic stop,"
#35. To: misterwhite (#8)
#36. To: jeremiad (#35)
"What? Are we living in a prison that is called a nation?'
#37. To: misterwhite (#36)
#38. To: jeremiad (#37)
"DWI should be a crime, and enforced but only within the confines of actual police work. Like observation and instinct, not with forced blood draws.'
Replies to Comment # 38.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]