United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Bowe Bergdahl, once missing U.S. soldier, charged with desertion
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ ... harged-with-desertion/?hpid=z1
Published: Mar 25, 2015
Author: Dan Lamothe
Post Date: 2015-03-25 14:36:55 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 13282
Comments: 86
Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the U.S. soldier who was recovered in Afghanistan last spring after five years in captivity, faces charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy, according to his lawyer. Eugene Fidell, Bergdahl’s attorney, told The Washington Post that his client was handed a charge sheet on Tuesday. Army officials announced they will provide an update in his case at 3:30 p.m. at Fort Bragg, N.C., but declined to discuss new developments ahead of the news conference.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 68.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Is this the guy whose parents appeared with the president for some sort of announcement months ago? OH No!
I was going to post a photo of the Bergdahl parents with Obummer and found this nice one from BareNakedIslam.com. I wonder if the Bergdahl parents will stay in hiding or come charging out on a media offensive. This is a blow to Obama on that foolish trade of Bergdahl for the 5 Taliban leaders, who are almost off detention in Qatar and ready to go home to shoot at Americans again. No way this White House didn't try to stop this courtmartial. BNI has some other playful pix.
But not the blow to his ego that Bibi hit him with. In this case The Imam in Chief was fully prepared to take the hit for facilitating this obvious treason. There was NO way of stopping this CM from going down. Besides, it was a GREAT trade for his "side" after all. FIVE terr'ists for one traitor?? We all know Bergdahl will merely be pardoned in 2016, most likely after having served a few months -- if that.
I see as most likely that Bergdahl will plea bargain, plead guilty to one count of something, and accept a Bad Conduct Discharge with forfeiture of pay and allowances, including the pay for his time in captivity. A legal point of contention may be whether he intended to remain away permanently, or was he taking a dump or communing with Gaia when captured, said capture preventing his return from an unauthorized absence.
We shall see. The investigating officer with legal counsel drummed up the article 99. Tells me the government is not leaning towards a plea bargain. Soldiers died looking for this crap bag. His unit from reports are unanimous in saying he fled. He left his unit without authorization and left his weapon behind. He didn't want to be found. If he did he would have taken a piece of equipment where he could be found. Assets were taken off combat operations to look for him endangering more soldiers. I think article 99 is there in the charge sheet for a reason.
I'm sure it is, but I think it is to ensure that Bergdahl will plead guilty as part of a deal to get rid of that charge. I do not think this case will face a trial. It took quite a while for the White House and the military to come up with this charge sheet.
I think the Pentagon controls this and the WH is helpless. If the WH had any real power to change the outcome, there would be no charges at all. As for a pardon, don't you have to have a conviction prior to a presidential or gubernatorial pardon? You can't have preemptive pardons issued prior to a lawful finding of guilt. Too much temptation for crooked pols to just pardon all their henchmen in advance. I think the Bergdahl courtmartial will drag on well through mid-2016. I think it will be fodder for criticism of Obama and especially Hitlery. By summer of 2016, it won't matter as much because then a convicted Bergdahl is still damaging and a pardoned Bergdahl hurts Obola and Hitlery even worse.
What was Nixon convicted of when Ford pardoned him?
Pardoning him was the same as convicting him in the court of public opinion. Having praised Bergdahl for his service, Obama pardoning him prior to a court martial would politicize the whole process. And Bergdahl would be assumed guilty as charged (or worse) and Obama would literally be eating his own words after treating Bergdahl as a war hero for his spectacular desertion and consorting with the enemy. Even the libmedia won't cover up for a Bergdahl pardon. I think it would be a sort of breaking point for them.
But they could cover for a commutation of sentence after a plea agreement. His time in captivity could be used to justify commuting his prison sentence with the rest of the sentence left standing. That could even be done in January 2017.
I think the biggest objections are to the idea of paying him $350K and getting an honorable discharge when he is probably responsible for causing the deaths of 4-6 soldiers dispatched to find him. There is still the open question of whether he directly collaborated with his captors and revealed sensitive info about convoy operations and security that helped the Taliban make their attacks on American troops more deadly. I've read many times accusations from soldiers that he served with that the effectiveness of these attacks increased sharply shortly after his capture. They think he collaborated actively. But your proposed plea deal would satisfy enough people that it might be workable. And Obama is about as likely to pardon him as to promote him to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. IOW, no way.
For clarity, please note that the deal would be unlikely to satisfy me, but I am assessing what I am observing. It would make a lot of military people unhappy. I assess it as a plea deal in motion.
With who?
Those from 17 to 117 who have served in uniform.
#70. To: nolu chan (#68)
Those from 17 to 117 who have served in uniform. Not an answer to my question. You answered who will be angry not with whom they will be angry. So I ask again, with whom will they be angry?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Fred Mertz, redleghunter (#1)
Is this the guy whose parents appeared with the president for some sort of announcement months ago?
#12. To: TooConservative, redleghunter (#3)
This is a blow to 0buma on that foolish trade of Bergdahl for the 5 Taliban leaders, who are almost off detention in Qatar and ready to go home to shoot at Americans again. No way this White House didn't try to stop this courtmartial.
#20. To: Liberator, TooConservative, redleghunter (#12)
We all know Bergdahl will merely be pardoned in 2016, most likely after having served a few months -- if that.
#27. To: nolu chan, Liberator, TooConservative, CZ82 (#20)
A legal point of contention may be whether he intended to remain away permanently, or was he taking a dump or communing with Gaia when captured, said capture preventing his return from an unauthorized absence.
#33. To: redleghunter, Liberator, TooConservative, CZ82 (#27)
I think article 99 is there in the charge sheet for a reason.
#34. To: nolu chan, redleghunter (#33)
#46. To: TooConservative, nolu chan, redleghunter (#34)
As for a pardon, don't you have to have a conviction prior to a presidential or gubernatorial pardon?
#55. To: SOSO (#46)
What was Nixon convicted of when Ford pardoned him?
#60. To: TooConservative, SOSO (#55)
Even the libmedia won't cover up for a Bergdahl pardon. I think it would be a sort of breaking point for them.
#62. To: nolu chan (#60)
But they could cover for a commutation of sentence after a plea agreement. His time in captivity could be used to justify commuting his prison sentence with the rest of the sentence left standing.
#65. To: TooConservative (#62)
But your proposed plea deal would satisfy enough people that it might be workable.
#66. To: nolu chan, TooConservative (#65)
It would make a lot of military people unhappy.
#68. To: SOSO (#66)
With who?
Replies to Comment # 68. With who?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 68.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]