[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Let’s Be Serious About Ted Cruz From The Start: He’s Too Extreme And Too Disliked To Win
Source: FiveThirtyEight Politics
URL Source: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features ... treme-and-too-disliked-to-win/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Harry Enten
Post Date: 2015-03-23 15:57:49 by Jameson
Keywords: cruz, extreme, disliked
Views: 25291
Comments: 151

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s newly minted presidential campaign is the media equivalent of a juicy rib-eye that robbers use to distract a guard dog during a heist. He’ll get a ton of media attention, and he’ll get to spread his message — which may be all that Cruz is after — but Cruz almost certainly has no shot of winning the nomination, according to every indicator that predicts success in presidential primaries.

First, Cruz doesn’t have enough support from party bigwigs. To win the Republican or Democratic nomination, you need the backing of at least some of the party apparatus. At a minimum, your fellow party members shouldn’t hate you. Otherwise, you end up getting the Newt Gingrich 2012 treatment. That is, you get pounced on the moment you’re seen as a threat to win the nomination.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 130.

#22. To: Jameson (#0)

Cruz almost certainly has no shot of winning the nomination, according to every indicator that predicts success in presidential primaries.

That's exactly what the pundits said about Reagan...

I for one hope Cruz keeps on being underestimated.

At a minimum, your fellow party members shouldn’t hate you.

Who be that? McStain? McConnell?? The whitebeard, establishment RINOs?? Their numbers are overinflated. These turncoat "bi-partisan" whores can pound salt.

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   10:05:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Liberator (#22)

At a minimum, your fellow party members shouldn’t hate you.

Who be that? McStain? McConnell?? The whitebeard, establishment RINOs?? Their numbers are overinflated.

So....do you really believe that Cruz can be the republican's presidential nominee?

- and that this can happen without the support (and money) of the moderates?

- please don't compare Cruz to Reagan.... most people liked RR - that is simply not the case with Cruz.... Or - do you expect him to start playing the "kinder, gentler" candidate?

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   10:14:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Jameson (#25)

So....do you really believe that Cruz can be the republican's presidential nominee?

- and that this can happen without the support (and money) of the moderates?

Yes. Absolutely.

I hope you, the moderate'leftist pundits and the establishment-types continue to believe Cruz is unelectable based on "likeability," and impossible to finance.

There are far more patriots -- within the general populace, industry, and private sector -- who recognize Cruz is the only anecdote to 0buma's gutting of this nation in every way. THIS is a guy who is laser-focused.

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   10:22:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Liberator (#27)

"...There are far more patriots -- within the general populace, industry, and private sector -- who recognize Cruz is the only anecdote to 0buma's gutting of this nation in every way...."

1. So what makes one a "patriot?"

2. If Mr. Cruz is the only "anecdote" what will the "patriots" do if he (god forbid) does not become the republican's nominee?

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   10:56:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Jameson (#34)

1. So what makes one a "patriot?"

A strict Constitutionalist and America-Firster.

2. If Mr. Cruz is the only "anecdote" what will the "patriots" do if he (god forbid) does not become the republican's nominee?

That dire scenario remains to be seen. I suppose....succumb to the escalated Police State and Big Gubmint, and further destruction of the US Constitution.

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   11:06:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Liberator (#35)

I suppose....succumb to the escalated Police State and Big Gubmint, and further destruction of the US Constitution.

well, yeah of course....

but in the short term....will you vote for Bush?

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   11:20:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Jameson (#37)

Will you vote for a Dem over a Pubbie in any case?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   11:31:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Liberator (#40)

Will you vote for a Dem over a Pubbie in any case?

Yes, of course.

I have voted for republicans, democrats, libertarians, non-affiliated.....etc it all depends on the circumstances at that time...

I have also chosen to not vote in some races - if none of the candidates are worthy.

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   11:52:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Jameson (#46)

I have voted for republicans, democrats, libertarians, non-affiliated.....etc it all depends on the circumstances at that time...

Atta boy! Standing on the principles of quicksand, and casting your vote on which way the wind happens to be blowing.

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   13:09:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Liberator (#62)

Standing on the principles of quicksand, and casting your vote on which way the wind happens to be blowing.

Heh heh....you bet.

Actually I really don't care much for political parties or labels like "conservative" or "liberal"

This style thinking is limiting, divisive, and antique.

IMHO

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   13:44:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Jameson (#69) (Edited)

Actually I really don't care much for political parties or labels like "conservative" or "liberal"

I guess you don't much care for defining a person or party by their respective words, deeds, actions, life philosophy, or agendas either. That's the reason for party or labels, aka "branding."

This style thinking is limiting, divisive, and antique. IMHO

It's a necessary means of discernment or judgment. Is in your opinion discernment or judgement....irrelevant?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-24   13:49:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Liberator (#71)

I guess you don't much care for defining a person or party by their respective words, deeds, actions, life philosophy, or agendas either.

Actually I really don't care much for political parties or labels like "conservative" or "liberal"

Maybe I wasn't clear, allow me to re-phrase...

I don't believe that everyone who is identified as a "republican" (or other designation) will all respond or act in the same manner in any given situation. Everyone responds differently.

The label or (party label) is irrelevant.

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-24   14:00:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: Jameson (#74)

I don't believe that everyone who is identified as a "republican" (or other designation) will all respond or act in the same manner in any given situation. Everyone responds differently.

MOST conservatives/Republicans WILL base their life philosophy and ethics on absolutes of morality, individual liberty, and self-preservation.

MOST liberal/Democrats will base their life philosophy and ethics on feelings, moral relativism, and group-think "fairness."

The label or (party label) is irrelevant.

Is it? Don't labels define us based on either the truth or by whomever controls the political narrative based on propaganda? In our culture's case, who would deny that this arbiter is decidedly an anti-Christian, liberal-socialist philosophy?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-25   10:38:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: Liberator (#97)

MOST conservatives/Republicans WILL base their life philosophy and ethics on ....Blah, Blah, Blah

MOST liberal/Democrats will base their life philosophy and ethics on ....Blah, Blah, Blah

So....what do you think MOST "People" will base their life philosophy and ethics on ...???

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-25   11:43:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: Jameson (#112)

So....what do you think MOST "People" will base their life philosophy and ethics on ...???

There are two types of people (mostly):

1) Givers, who who base their lives on a definitive standard of ethics and morality based on "The Golden Rule" or God's Laws.

2) Takers, who generally disbelieve in moral absolutes, a lack of personal responsibility, and belief that the world (and others) owe them.

And your own opinion on the matter?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-25   12:00:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: Liberator (#116)

And your own opinion on the matter?

I believe that just about everyone will do what's best for them, in any given situation.

I think that a strong majority would profess to be "givers"....and 99% of them would be lying.

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-25   12:13:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: Jameson (#119) (Edited)

I believe that just about everyone will do what's best for them, in any given situation.

That's a pretty general statement that fails to address ANY differences in philosophy of living between say, a Christian, a Muslim, and an Atheist.

If what you believe is true, then why are all the Christian-based nations and societies the leaders in technical advancements, freedom, and the concepts of equality?

I think that a strong majority would profess to be "givers"....and 99% of them would be lying.

Not very aware of America's bustling charitable orgs, are you? Or the Christian ethos?

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-25   12:22:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: Liberator (#121)

That's a pretty general statement that fails to address ANY differences in philosophy of living between say, a Christian, a Muslim, and an Atheist.

You are correct.

I think that a strong majority would profess to be "givers"....and 99% of them would be lying.

Not very aware of America's bustling charitable orgs, are you? Or the Christian ethos?

I believe that just about everyone will do what's best for them, in any given situation.

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-25   12:31:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: Jameson (#125)

I believe that just about everyone will do what's best for them, in any given situation.

People will instinctively and pragmatically act with self-preservation in mind, yes...

But that still doesn't account for a "life-philosophy" or moral code.

Liberator  posted on  2015-03-25   12:35:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#130. To: Liberator (#127)

But that still doesn't account for a "life-philosophy" or moral code.

This is where we disagree, "...just about everyone will do what's best for them, in any given situation..."

Is indeed a life-philosophy or moral code.

Jameson  posted on  2015-03-25   12:41:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 130.

#135. To: Jameson (#130)

a life-philosophy or moral code.

Altruistic behavior is exhibited by many animals.

Got Sex, Evolution and Behavior?

www.goodreads.com/book/sh...ex_Evolution_and_Behavior

VxH  posted on  2015-03-25 13:12:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 130.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com