[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: 'A new baby, plastic surgery or ill-health? No, Putin disappeared because he's BORED'
Source: express.co.uk
URL Source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world ... e-due-to-boredom-in-top-office
Published: Mar 20, 2015
Author: LEVI WINCHESTER
Post Date: 2015-03-21 02:00:52 by Pericles
Keywords: Russia, Putin
Views: 1189
Comments: 7

'A new baby, plastic surgery or ill-health? No, Putin disappeared because he's BORED'

RUSSIAN president Vladimir Putin has become "bored" of top office and may have merely been taking a break during his recent mystery disappearance from the public eye, according to a former British ambassador.

By LEVI WINCHESTER

PUBLISHED: 14:22, Fri, Mar 20, 2015

The autocratic leader was not seen in public for 11 days earlier this month, sparking rumours of ill health, a baby on the way, plastic surgery and even his own death.

But President Putin reappeared and broke his silence this week, using a television appearance to brush off rumours of his supposed disappearing act.

While the Russian president has yet to reveal the mystery surrounding his almost two-week absence, Sir Tony Brenton, the former British ambassador to Russia, has suggested that Putin can become "cheesed off with the ordinary routine" and may have just been taking time out.

He recalled how, during his four years as an ambassador, the Russian leader would often take "quite long breaks" from Moscow - adding that him having time out is not necessarily "out of pattern".

"He used to disappear off from Moscow and go to his palace on the Black Sea," said Sir Tony.

"And if you think about how Russia runs, he's not the sort of democratically-elected politician who needs to keep himself in the public eye.

"He can afford to disappear and know that he is still in power when he comes back."

He added: "The routine business of governing Russia, at the time when I was there and I am sure this is still true, no longer interests him very much.

"He's been doing it now since 1999, so 15 years, and that stuff doesn't interest him. He occasionally feels the need to take a break from it.

"When there are serious decisions to be taken, actually the people with whom he makes those decisions come to him rather than him having to be in Moscow."

Speaking on Monday during his first public appearance since March 5, the Russian leader made light of his apparent disappearance and said: "It would be boring without gossip."

Sir Tony has suggested that this type of reaction is "very him" and described how Putin likes to feel "slightly on top of the game and ahead of everyone else".

The former ambassador, who met Putin several times between 2004 and 2008, said he also suspected that the Russian president was "immensely amused" by all the rampant speculation surrounding his disappearance.

Sir Tony, who is now a Fellow of Wolfson College at Cambridge University and is writing a book on Russian history, said: "He's a guy with a very sardonic sense of humour, of which I saw examples of over the years.

"He likes the sort of joke where other people look slightly inferior to him and he will have immensely enjoyed the picture of lots of Western commentators creating totally absurd rumours about why he has disappeared."

Speculation over Putin's whereabouts during his absence increased after Russian state television had to retract claims that he had hosted an official visit from the President of Kyrgyzstan.

The Kremlin had also been forced to deny that he has been seriously ill, had died, or was in Switzerland to be with his alleged girlfriend while she gives birth to a baby girl.

But after making his first public appearance since the rumours surfaced, Putin was described as fit - and even in macho mode - during a meeting with the the Kyrgyzstan President, Almazbek Atambayev, near St Petersburg in Russia.

Meanwhile, Putin was joined by tens of thousands of Russian supporters on Thursday as they marked one year since the seizure of Crimea from Ukraine.

The Russian leader reportedly praised his people for their patriotism, something which Sir Tony suggested was "genuine".

He said: "It is important for us in the West to understand that Russians are much more patriotic and nationalistic than we are. It is still regarded as a huge virtue in Russia.

"There is no doubt that one of Russia's great strengths in dealing with the Ukraine issue is that Putin has been able to get all his people to coalesce around him in support of his policies, even though economically it is doing them a lot of damage.

"His praise for Russian nationalism is genuine."

The Prime Minister of Ukraine also spoke out on Thursday - and called for the European Union to remain united behind sanctions on Russia amid the continuing crisis in the east of his country.

Arseniy Yatsenyuk's plea came amid concerns that support for Ukraine is beginning to slip as a cease-fire between Ukraine and separatist rebels takes hold.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Pericles (#0)

or he could be Khrushchev circa 1964 and he is in the process of 'retiring ' .

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.(Daniel Webster)

tomder55  posted on  2015-03-21   4:40:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tomder55 (#1)

or he could be Khrushchev circa 1964 and he is in the process of 'retiring ' .

Nope.

Pericles  posted on  2015-03-22   3:15:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Pericles (#2)

Why dismiss that possibility ? He replaced Yeltsin because of Yeltsin's performance during the Kosovo war ,and because of the state of the Russian economy . Today the Russian economy is again approaching a disaster with the sanctions ,and the price of oil hurting his cronies.

Before this Ukraine crisis began ,a little over a year ago ,the country was led by Russian ally Viktor Yanukovich . Putin was considered the strong horse in the world because of his taking Obama to school in Syria ,and the success of the Sochi Olympics.

Now the best outcome Putin can hope for in Ukraine is a federal republic with semi-autonomous regions ,or a divided Ukraine.

Yes Putin's reemergence means that there was no coup today. That doesn't mean it isn't possible .

Putin has worked hard to return elements of the old Soviet model to governance . He even calls his cabinet a "Politburo". Leading that system requires the leader to form coalitions of factions to survive. Putin was successful in putting his cronies into positions of power .But will they back him if things continue to slide ? Khrushchev was replaced because of his foreign policy over-reach . Is it hard to imagine Putin suffering the same fate ? I think these recent exercises on the Russian frontier which was not announced before it began March 16,could be signs of desperation on his part . I don't take any comfort in contemplating Putin's downfall. There are plenty in Russia more hardline than he is . Right now after the stalemate in East Ukraine ,we are looking at the scenario I described . But others in Moscow would take the war to the next level and take East Ukraine at least by invasion.

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.(Daniel Webster)

tomder55  posted on  2015-03-22   6:02:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All, redleghunter (#3)

Why dismiss that possibility ? He replaced Yeltsin because of Yeltsin's performance during the Kosovo war ,and because of the state of the Russian economy . Today the Russian economy is again approaching a disaster with the sanctions ,and the price of oil hurting his cronies.

Before this Ukraine crisis began ,a little over a year ago ,the country was led by Russian ally Viktor Yanukovich . Putin was considered the strong horse in the world because of his taking Obama to school in Syria ,and the success of the Sochi Olympics.

Now the best outcome Putin can hope for in Ukraine is a federal republic with semi-autonomous regions ,or a divided Ukraine.

Yes Putin's reemergence means that there was no coup today. That doesn't mean it isn't possible .

Putin has worked hard to return elements of the old Soviet model to governance . He even calls his cabinet a "Politburo". Leading that system requires the leader to form coalitions of factions to survive. Putin was successful in putting his cronies into positions of power .But will they back him if things continue to slide ? Khrushchev was replaced because of his foreign policy over-reach . Is it hard to imagine Putin suffering the same fate ? I think these recent exercises on the Russian frontier which was not announced before it began March 16,could be signs of desperation on his part . I don't take any comfort in contemplating Putin's downfall. There are plenty in Russia more hardline than he is . Right now after the stalemate in East Ukraine ,we are looking at the scenario I described . But others in Moscow would take the war to the next level and take East Ukraine at least by invasion.

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.(Daniel Webster)

tomder55  posted on  2015-03-22   6:03:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tomder55 (#3)

Why dismiss that possibility ?

Because the policies have not shifted at all. Evidence on the ground, etc.

Pericles  posted on  2015-03-22   13:04:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tomder55 (#4)

The fundamental difference between Vladimir Putin and any Soviet leader is this: Putin is the popularly elected President of a constitutional republic. Soviet leaders were dictators.

In the USSR, the Party could cause a Krushchev to retire by realigning its power, and physically oust him if he would not go quietly. There was no press and no popular party to do anything about it.

In Russia, Putin has been twice elected President. He is the most popular politician in the land. A much vaster majority of Russians support him more ardently than any majority ever supported President Reagan here. Reagan was popular in America. Putin is far more popular in Russia.

Nobody could stage a political coup against Putin and peacefully remove him from, power. His legitimacy is absolute. He was elected, under the constitution, by a very large majority of the people. Russian institutions are functioning normally under the Russian constitution. Putin is not a dictator any more than Reagan was or Obama is.

In the USSR, there were powerful secret organizations that had political control, and there was no rule of law.

In Russia, the President controls the secret police and intelligence organizations, and there is a rule of law.

Democracy chose Putin. He could be assassinated, yes, but if THAT happened, the people would turn on the assassins in murderous fury and they would not enjoy their last days on earth. Nobody who struck down Putin could possibly assume power. There would be popular elections, and a new person would be elected by the Russian people to carry on Putin's legacy.

The thing that Americans seem to not have come to grips with is that Russia is a democracy, Putin is elected, and his popularity is real, and vast. The vast majority of Russians agree with Putin and support Putin. There is less possibility of a coup in Russia against Putin then there was in America against President Reagan.

An assassination? That's different. John F. Kennedy observed that any many could kill him if he was willing to trade his life for his. That's the deal in this world. Anybody can be killed, but when the price of that killing is certain death for one's self, very, very few people are so wedded to a political position that they're willing to kill and CERTAINLY die for it.

In war, very few soldiers are willing to do something that will CERTAINLY result in their deaths.

There will be no coup in America against Obama, and he's not popular. There will certainly be no coup in Russia against Putin. He is.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-03-23   11:14:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

I would be more inclined to believe the Russian media about his popularity if he hadn't systemically shut down almost all opposition press in the country .

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jun/23/media.russia

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-03-23   13:52:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com