United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Children raised by gay couples thank Dolce & Gabbana for supporting traditional marriage amidst Elton John’s boycott
Source:
Life Site News
URL Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/c ... edium=email&utm_term=0_0caba61
Published: Mar 20, 2015
Author: Thaddeus Baklinski
Post Date: 2015-03-20 23:35:25 by redleghunter
Keywords: None
Views: 42159
Comments: 187
March 20, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) - Six Americans raised by homosexual parents sent a letter of support thanking openly gay fashion legends Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana for their recent remarks defending the traditional family. Gay activists, spearheaded by singer Elton John, have condemned the pair and urged a boycott of their fashion line after they told the Italian magazine Panorama that they oppose gay “marriage” and adoption, find in vitro fertilization unnatural, believe procreation “must be an act of love,” and that “the only family is the traditional one.” The letter, published in Tempi this week, says the six signatories – five women and one man – "want to thank you for giving voice to something that we learned by experience: Every human being has a mother and a father, and to cut either from a child’s life is to rob the child of dignity, humanity, and equality." "We know that you will come under tremendous pressure, especially now when both Italy and the United States are being pushed to override our concerns for our rights to a mom and dad, in order to please a powerful gay lobby," the group said. They explained that it was their experience that, "Nobody receives more vicious attacks from the lobby than those who come from the gay community and question its policies: children of gay couples just as much as the gay men who defend them (like the two of you). "You have shown yourselves to be extremely brave. You have given us great inspiration as all six of us prepare to submit letters to the US Supreme Court against gay marriage." "We want to praise your courage and thank you for your inspiration," the signatories said, and implored Dolce and Gabbana "not to surrender when the backlash grows in intensity." "If you back down from what you said and apologize," the group concluded, "it will leave the children of gay homes even more vulnerable and discredited. It is important for our sake, for the sake of Italian children as well, that you not apologize or capitulate. Please support the idea that all children need to be bonded with their mothers and fathers. It is a human right." "It's not us who invented the family," Dolce said in the recent interview in Italy’s Panorama magazine. "You are born and you have a mother and a father. "Or at least it should be so, that's why I'm skeptical about what I call the sons of the chemistry, synthetic children, wombs for rent, seeds chosen by a catalog. And then, let's go to these children and explain them who is their mother. Would you ever accept to be a daughter of the chemistry? Procreation needs to be an act of love."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-147) not displayed.
.
.
.
#148. To: redleghunter (#145)
(Edited)
"without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female." What "sex" constitutes majority of individuals in a healthy bee hive? What a surprise (NOT) that the temple whores of Delphi chose the bee to represent them.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. It's not Jefferson's bones that have captured my attention - but the Ideas he was used to convey, that somebody took the time to write in stone. No Domina, I mock the human religiously concocted created things, and their state-established Temple-perching caeSARean creators, who would assume dominion over my relationship to Him.
What a surprise (NOT) that the temple whores of Delphi chose the bee to represent them. You must be a hoot at weddings and Barmitzvahs.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
More of a Bzzzzzzz than a hoot.
And yet you have this very strange need to get in people's faces over religious views they have. Why is that? Why is this strange need of yours so virulent and what caused this? Were you an alter boy who was given 'special attention' by the priest?
Why is that? Why is this strange need of yours so virulent and what caused this? Were you an alter boy who was given 'special attention' by the priest?
You mean your spamming of threads with post after post of words (prayers) and stone monuments (idols) dedicated to and attributed Jefferson (your god) are NOT acts of worship? Tsk. Our God is a jealous God.
PING
Tsk. From your posts I get the impression what you worship are yourself and the opinions you and your fellow goons share whilst backslapping and snearing to each other about your superiority over the infidels... as you perch around the donut table on Sun-day mornings. Is the edification of the body of Christ you display typical of your "church"'s membership?
Maybe it's a natural response to when Fallible and Uninspired frauds assume dominion over the tele-curriculum.
Wow, they all post here? Who knew!
Birds of a feather fleece together.
So the people who post here hang out at all of those people's houses?
Oh, never mind, it's obvious you are calling the posters here con artist theifs.
How much money did they get from you? I hope a lot.
Is their version of organized religious dominion any different?
Zero. Is that what your Christian doctrine teaches you to hope?
So, you are calling me a Christian? Find a single post anywhere by me where I claim any religious affiliation. There is 14 years worth of posts, and I can assure you not once have I said that. So, you've called all the posters here who believe in Christ crooks, without any evidence, is that what you consider cool? Or, are you just Yukons twin?
No, you called them crooks. I just call them Fallible and Uninspired parrots who assume dominion over the faith of others. Just like their tele-sun-parrot counterparts. And there's PLENTY of evidence for that.
Does parroting a defense of Fallible and Uninspired sun-parrots make an individual Christian?
Obviously to some ignorant POSs it does.
Ignorant about what, exactly, Domina?
I just call them Fallible and Uninspired parrots who assume dominion over the faith of others. Just like their tele-sun-parrot counterparts. And there's PLENTY of evidence for that. So, birds of a feather fleece together doesn't mean they are crooks, just like those in the pictures? Now it's obvious you lie. Also, tell me how someone assumes dominion over another's faith? You just throw pompous words out there, but it's obvious there is no depth of thought behind anything you post, just tripe you repackage over and over, all of it designed to get under someone's skin. I can appreciate a good troll, but your act is getting old.
"Crooks" is the word coming from your beak. Meanwhile, the uniform vitriole of the sun-parrots (you're defending) towards the Viginia Act and its author unites them. 'To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.' Don't you agree?
Vitriol? Dumbass, the reason only reason I'm on this thread is because of YOUR vitriol. Tard.
Were the money changers on the steps of the temple "crooks" - or just state-established sun-parrots making a living... by assuming dominion over the faith of others? Were the sacrificial goats and chickens they sold flawed somehow? Did their customers not receive the fleecing they paid for?
ETERNAL HOSTILITY
You sure it's not just to satiate your ego? What's next a demonstration of projectile peeing?
So, dumbfuck, why don't you go ask those guys? As far as I know, no one here is a money changer.
To: Dead Culture Watch vitriol ETERNAL HOSTILITY To that, I plead guilty, I am and always will be eternally hostile to assholes like you and Yukon.
LOL. That's impressive. As far as you know, Domina, did the money changers assume dominion over the faith of others?
It wasn't an accusation, super genius. It was a correction. "I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TOWARD EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"--Thomas Jefferson The Sun-parrots you're defending are quite vitriolic toward that assertion and its author, and those who share Jefferson's sentiments toward them.
It's late Nancy, I get up at 4 am to support trash like you, good night.
Now who's making unsupported accusations? I don't need or receive "support" from goons like you. Sweet dreams, Domina.
Children should be raised by their biological parents, one of each sex, who should be married for life, and who should have both been chaste until marriage. Properly, a child is conceived within the context of a lifelong conjugal union, is raised by those parents, and remains chaste until his or her own marriage, and continues the cycle. Any sexual activity outside of married union is sinful. This includes simple masturbation, which is at best a simple uncleanness, and can be a much more serious sin depending on the mental fantasies involved in it (for Jesus told us that lusting after a woman is adultery of the heart). Sexual activity with another individual (or individuals) outside of marriage is fornication or adultery or sodomy, all of which are sins generically called "porneia" in Greek: sexual immorality. The first commandment that God gave to man upon our creation was "Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and subdue her". He gave that same commandment again to Noah and the others when they came off the Ark after the Flood. The sin of Babel was remaining concentrated in one place and thereby defying God's command to fill the whole earth. When married couples use contraception to avoid being fruitful, they frustrate the purpose of sex as God made and intended it, and they sin. All sex outside of marriage, including sex with yourself, is sinful. All pursuit of lustful thoughts, including looking at pornographic pictures, is sinful. All sex within marriage that uses contraception to frustrate God's will is sinful. God hates divorce (see Malachi, where the Prophet says those exact words; also see Jesus). And God has defined remarriage after divorce as adultery. Within Israel, his people under his law, were not permitted to approach their spouses for sex during the woman's period, or until the time afterwards when she had taken her mikvah. A woman's unclean period was seven days. Thus, under the laws of God, men are not permitted to have sex in any form until marriage, and then during marriage, are only permitted it during 75% of the year. 7 days of every 28 are periods of uncleanness due to menstruation. The notion that men "need" sex is false. Men are capable of living celibate, chaste lives, and God commands us to do that. God has created sex for a set of explicit purposes, of which procreation is the first commandment. Thus, all forms of contraception are sinful. Abortion is outright murder. That's the law of God. Most of us fall short of it. The only proper response to falling short is to acknowledge the sin, ask for forgiveness, get back up and go forth to not sin again. That's it. That's all. Instead, what people mostly have done is seek to either change the law or denigrate it. The economic structures and concepts that God established for men will work to permit people to be fruitful and multiply. Our economic system won't. Therefore, obviously, our economic system and political structures are occasions to sin, and should be cut off and cast away, and God's re-adopted. But men don't make the connections between economics and politics and sex, and seek instead to either (a) assert that there is no law of God (or that there's no God to HAVE a law, or (b) assert that we're "free" of the law and may do as we please, and still nevertheless be blessed by God. We keep dying, and our lives and systems keep falling apart, so apparently God hasn't gotten the word.
Your presentation of the Law and Economony of God vs. that of man (world) sums up all of your comments quite well. Sobering and instructive. Also squares with things to come. When Christ comes again it will be as a conquering King to bring Judgement and reward.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
Sobering and instructive. Also squares with things to come. When Christ comes again it will be as a conquering King to bring Judgement and reward. There's a reason why Jesus and the Apostles so often quoted the Songs ("psalm" is the word "song". We speak English. It is the Book of Songs, not "Psalms"). Song lyrics have a beat and music that makes them much more memorable than prose and blank verse. We've sung this traditional Advent song a few times during this Lent. It perfectly summarizes what you wrote, and tells it like it is: The King shall come when morning dawns and light triumphant breaks, when beauty gilds the eastern hills, and life to joy awakes. Not as of old a little child, to suffer and to die; but crowned with glory like the sun that lights the morning sky. Oh, brighter than the rising morn when Christ, victorious, rose, and left the lonesome place of death despite the rage of foes. Oh, brighter than that glorious morn shall dawn upon our race the day when Christ in splendor comes and we shall see His face. The King shall come when morning dawns, and light and beauty brings. Hail, Christ the Lord! Your people pray: Come quickly, King of kings!
Not as of old a little child, to suffer and to die; but crowned with glory like the sun that lights the morning sky. Oh, brighter than the rising morn when Christ, victorious, rose, and left the lonesome place of death despite the rage of foes. Oh, brighter than that glorious morn shall dawn upon our race the day when Christ in splendor comes and we shall see His face. The King shall come when morning dawns, and light and beauty brings. Hail, Christ the Lord! Your people pray: Come quickly, King of kings! Love it. A beautiful poem. Maranatha! Autumn comes... and the leaves fall to the ground And the fields of green turned to shades of brown That is how the master paints the town With a spray of colors meant to melt your frown And soon in the restless leaves will all lie still As a billion flakes of snow adorn my sill That is how the Master of cleans His house He does this in me, before he sends me out But how long will it be... Before these mortal eyes perceive That which all nature longs to see... But we only see his reflection in the trees There'll come a day not long from now When the artist will unveil himself To my eyes of clay Not through a glass sooted with my mistakes But like two men see... Face-to-face But how long will it be... Before these mortal eyes perceive That which all nature longs to see But we only see his reflection in the trees Maranatha... come quickly Lord Jesus! by Calvin Bergsma
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
I can appreciate a good troll, but your act is getting old. Oh, that's gonna leave a mark.
Well for example the "assumption" that anyone who dares contradict the Church's dogmatic opinions on the orbits of celestial bodies, is a heretic - for example. How'd that work out for Copernicus' ideas, and those who dared to articulate them in defiance of the state-established sun-parrots, again?
Only if you see the goal of procreation is to produce eunuchs. It is not.
Your religious / human manufactured opinions regarding the "goals" of nature are irrelevant to nature. Just as water freezes at 32 degrees so too the fact that, without the effects of androgen hormones, human genitals develop as female - is self-evident, and stands regardless of opinion to the contrary. 
#149. To: Liberator (#146)
(Edited)
Truth is, you're a necromantic of Thomas Jefferson's bones who worships false idols and a false religion.
And you mock the Lord...
#150. To: VxH, liberator, A K A Stone, Vicomte13 (#148)
What "sex" constitutes majority of individuals in a healthy bee hive?
#151. To: redleghunter (#150)
(Edited)
You must be a hoot at weddings and Barmitzvahs.
#152. To: VxH (#130)
My view is I'm an infidel who enjoys America's protections against state-established religious coercion.
#153. To: Dead Culture Watch, VxH, releghunter, A K A Stone (#152)
And yet you have this very strange need to get in people's faces over religious views they have.
#154. To: VxH (#149)
(Edited)
It's not Jefferson's bones that have captured my attention - but the Ideas he was used to convey, that somebody took the time to write in stone.
#155. To: Vicomte13 (#154)
#156. To: Liberator (#154)
Tsk. Our God is a jealous God.
#157. To: Dead Culture Watch (#152)
(Edited)
Why is that?
etc etc etc.
#158. To: VxH (#157)
#159. To: Dead Culture Watch (#158)
#160. To: VxH (#159)
#161. To: VxH (#159)
(Edited)
#162. To: VxH (#159)
#163. To: Dead Culture Watch (#160)
#164. To: Dead Culture Watch (#162)
How much money did they get from you?
I hope a lot.
#165. To: VxH (#164)
#166. To: Dead Culture Watch (#165)
(Edited)
So, you've called all the posters here who believe in Christ crooks
#167. To: Dead Culture Watch (#165)
(Edited)
So, you are calling me a Christian?
#168. To: VxH (#167)
#169. To: Dead Culture Watch (#168)
(Edited)
Obviously to some ignorant POSs it does.
#170. To: VxH (#166)
To: Dead Culture Watch So, you've called all the posters here who believe in Christ crooks No, you called them crooks.
#171. To: Dead Culture Watch (#170)
(Edited)
So, birds of a feather fleece together doesn't mean they are crooks, just like those in the pictures?
#172. To: VxH (#171)
#173. To: Dead Culture Watch (#170)
(Edited)
birds of a feather fleece together doesn't mean they are crooks,
#174. To: Dead Culture Watch (#172)
(Edited)
YOUR vitriol.
#175. To: Dead Culture Watch (#172)
the reason only reason I'm on this thread is because of YOUR vitriol.
#176. To: VxH (#173)
#177. To: VxH (#174)
#178. To: Dead Culture Watch (#176)
(Edited)
So, dumbfuck,
As far as I know, no one here is a money changer.
#179. To: Dead Culture Watch (#177)
(Edited)
ETERNAL HOSTILITY
To that, I plead guilty, I am and always will be eternally hostile to assholes like you and Yukon.
#180. To: VxH (#179)
#181. To: Dead Culture Watch (#180)
(Edited)
I get up at 4 am to support trash like you,
good night
#182. To: redleghunter (#0)
#183. To: Vicomte13 (#182)
#184. To: redleghunter (#183)
Your presentation of the Law and Economony of God vs. that of man (world) sums up all of your comments quite well.
#185. To: Vicomte13, BobCeleste, liberator, GarySpFc (#184)
The King shall come when morning dawns and light triumphant breaks, when beauty gilds the eastern hills, and life to joy awakes.
#186. To: Dead Culture Watch, VxH (#170)
Tell me how someone assumes dominion over another's faith? You just throw pompous words out there, but it's obvious there is no depth of thought behind anything you post, just tripe you repackage over and over, all of it designed to get under someone's skin.
#187. To: Liberator, Dead Culture Watch (#186)
(Edited)
Tell me how someone assumes dominion over another's faith?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]