United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Children raised by gay couples thank Dolce & Gabbana for supporting traditional marriage amidst Elton John’s boycott
Source:
Life Site News
URL Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/c ... edium=email&utm_term=0_0caba61
Published: Mar 20, 2015
Author: Thaddeus Baklinski
Post Date: 2015-03-20 23:35:25 by redleghunter
Keywords: None
Views: 42140
Comments: 187
March 20, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) - Six Americans raised by homosexual parents sent a letter of support thanking openly gay fashion legends Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana for their recent remarks defending the traditional family. Gay activists, spearheaded by singer Elton John, have condemned the pair and urged a boycott of their fashion line after they told the Italian magazine Panorama that they oppose gay “marriage” and adoption, find in vitro fertilization unnatural, believe procreation “must be an act of love,” and that “the only family is the traditional one.” The letter, published in Tempi this week, says the six signatories – five women and one man – "want to thank you for giving voice to something that we learned by experience: Every human being has a mother and a father, and to cut either from a child’s life is to rob the child of dignity, humanity, and equality." "We know that you will come under tremendous pressure, especially now when both Italy and the United States are being pushed to override our concerns for our rights to a mom and dad, in order to please a powerful gay lobby," the group said. They explained that it was their experience that, "Nobody receives more vicious attacks from the lobby than those who come from the gay community and question its policies: children of gay couples just as much as the gay men who defend them (like the two of you). "You have shown yourselves to be extremely brave. You have given us great inspiration as all six of us prepare to submit letters to the US Supreme Court against gay marriage." "We want to praise your courage and thank you for your inspiration," the signatories said, and implored Dolce and Gabbana "not to surrender when the backlash grows in intensity." "If you back down from what you said and apologize," the group concluded, "it will leave the children of gay homes even more vulnerable and discredited. It is important for our sake, for the sake of Italian children as well, that you not apologize or capitulate. Please support the idea that all children need to be bonded with their mothers and fathers. It is a human right." "It's not us who invented the family," Dolce said in the recent interview in Italy’s Panorama magazine. "You are born and you have a mother and a father. "Or at least it should be so, that's why I'm skeptical about what I call the sons of the chemistry, synthetic children, wombs for rent, seeds chosen by a catalog. And then, let's go to these children and explain them who is their mother. Would you ever accept to be a daughter of the chemistry? Procreation needs to be an act of love."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-114) not displayed.
.
.
.
#115. To: redleghunter (#112)
(Edited)
Yeah that's what your religiously petrified state-establishing brethren in ISIS assert too when they're raping the Yezidi "devil" worshippers. Idiots all. NO SALE.
So basically you are saying. You don't have a right to live. Got ya.
Do you believe that VxH has anything to offer those of us who seek the truth. I'm beginning to wonder if I should pull up the welcome mat.
Do Americans have the right to pursue the Truth sans state-established coercion?
Of course they do. But you don't have a right to peddle fabrications here. You're permitted to do that for shits and giggles at the moment. But you are starting to bore me, and others I'm sure.
They fully understand procreation and all it's phases. To be an effective future breeder of cattle this knowledge is a must at a young age in FFA. They know that when a sow gives birth the litter will have a certain percentage of male/female ratio. This is not hard really. How this confirms evolution over creation has no bearing. In fact, such an act shows more divine intervention than chance. But you are way off. At conception the sex of the embryo is determined. The sperm cell either has an X or Y chromosome. About 4 months later (humans) the sexual organs under go sexual differentiation based on the XX or XY sequence. You are looking for more than there is to this complex, yet clear chain of events.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
But you don't have a right to peddle fabrications here. "Male and female sex organs develop from the same tissue. Whether this tissue becomes male organs or female organs depends on the chromosomes and the presence or absence of male hormones. In males, a region on the Y chromosome triggers the development of testicles, which produce male hormones. Male genitals develop in response to male hormones from the fetal testicles. In a fetus without a Y chromosome — without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female." Is that a fabrication?
Probably not. That is not what I am talking about though. I'm talking about trolling peoples faith. Your points about some therapy changing the sex or appearing to change the sex. Doesn't matter concerning if God created us or not. You can always play mad scientist and screw with people. Your point is irrelevant to the discussion.
Ok Mr. Science tell me which chromosome sequence produces the hormones for male genitals? That would be the XY at conception. The XX, also, later produce the female hormones. You are hung up on birth defects in utero. It happens and those who are born with them must have our compassion and care.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
LOL. If both my sons had XX chromosomes at conception they would be girls. Welcome to procreation 101. You are starting to convince me sex education needs to be in public schools.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
And here you professed belief in the Christ of the Bible being truly God and truly Man. If the above is not the sovereign design of God, then what is your view?
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
And yet without Androgen, or with Insensitivity to Androgen - the genitalia don't undergo that differentiation, do they. Thus, XY individuals afflicted with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome present an external FEMALE appearance. She said she had no idea she was different when she was growing up but began to grow concerned when she had not started her periods by the age of 19, despite going through other signs of puberty. Following months of hospital trips and blood tests, specialists told her she had been born with XY chromosomes, meaning she was genetically male. She had no reproductive organs thanks to a condition called androgen insensitivity syndrome.
I'm beginning to wonder if I should pull up the welcome mat. He had a moment of clarity yesterday. Took three years but it happened. Stoke the fires and the wormwood and maybe we will get more:) I have no problem helping grown men learn about basic procreation (sex ed). We might get a few more kiddos born to this country if we do; instead of people discarding them.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
Is it true that in your alleged mind, Thomas Jefferson's pseudonym is "God"? You seem to have an unhealthy obsession for worshiping false idols and necromancy.
If they were XY and either produced no androgen hormones or were Androgen Insensitive -- what would they APPEAR to be?
My view is I'm an infidel who enjoys America's protections against state-established religious coercion.
Yeah that's what your religiously petrified state-establishing brethren in ISIS assert too when they're raping the Yezidi "devil" worshippers. So now you claim those who worship the God of Abraham are worshiping the same "god" as Muslims -- Allah, the satanic Moon God? Pick up your garbage can and medication, get up, and head straight to the nurses office. (We'll call an ambulance, Mommy and Daddy AND your psychiatrist.)
A birth defect. A test for us to be compassionate, kind and supportive. Has bunk to do with evolution vs. creation.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
You're an "Infidel" alright -- you believe in everything but nothing. Upthread you stated you believed in the Trinity, downthread you backed out. Secondly, let's see you try and prove your claim that you've been coerced by ANY established religion. GO, POLLY!
It matters to those interested in the nature of how He created us. And it matters when "pastors" assert that the individuals within their purview can't possibly be a member of "their" body of Christs if those individuals recognize certain self-evident natural truths that conflict with the "pastor"'s "the world is only 6000 years old" interpretation of Creation.
Wow. Only in rare cases this happens. It is called a birth defect. XY produces the necessary hormones to produce male genitals. That's how it works. Sometimes in this imperfect and fallen world it does not happen. How that determines your claim evolution is proved by this is not clear at all. But no the hormone does not determine the gender of the baby. That happens at conception. Then the XY or XX chromosome then determines the hormone for development.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
Of course not, but then I was reminded, "coke's a heluva drug" ~ Rick James Meanwhile, I'm still laughing at this gem: Otherwise, they'd have been born as female appearing... wait for it... EUNUCHS."
I agree. Then you should be railing against the US established religion of secular humanistic atheism. That is the established 'church' in the US today.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
"without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female."
Been there, railed against that. "EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"
Yes there is a eunuch fetish presented. Poor Vic used to be the sole "temple eunuch" target. Now horizons are expanding:)
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
Bring back the clown car, the circus elephants -- the one man band is BACK!!
BULLSEYE.
Yes there is a eunuch fetish presented. What sort of fetish was presented by the worshipers who frequented the services held in the Delphic district? ================================== "Sacred Prostitutes" An "improbable percentage of the population [of Mesopotamia and Syria-Canaan] must have been either secular or religious prostitutes of some sort," wrote Beatrice Brooks in 1941 (231). She was drawing conclusions from the writings of predominantly male scholars who accepted without question the concept of "sacred, cult, or temple prostitutes." Female temple functionaries, they maintained, regularly engaged in sexual intercourse in return for a payment to their temples. Female devotees of Inanna/Ishtar, the Mesopotamian goddess of sexuality and love, were "immediately" suspect of such behavior (Assante 1998:6). Until recently, most scholars took this view for granted, and some still do. http://www.matrifocus.com/SAM05/spotlight.htm
Yeah, remember that? (I am a "temple eunuch"...er I mean, Spartacus!)
www.mayoclinic.org/diseas...asics/causes/con-20026345 That's not a birth defect, it's a biological human reproductive FACT. Only if you see the goal of procreation is to produce eunuchs. It is not. The goal from conception is either XX or XY. What happens after that is either a normal developmental process or a defect is introduced in gestation. "'God made them male and female' from the beginning of creation"--Jesus Christ And Jesus said: "“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because He has anointed Me To preach the gospel to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed; To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.”(Luke chapter 4) Believe me...I know something about babies being born not 'perfect' babies. The struggles and surgeries the child endures and then see them overcome what was a 'defect' to be the fastest and strongest in their age group. Batting average is pretty good and what a glove!
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
Not quite with as much vigor, vinegar, and heap of insanity. Truth is, you're a necromantic of Thomas Jefferson's bones who worships false idols and a false religion. And you mock the Lord...
Spartacus and his wife were both free before the Roman state-establishment enslaved them. How did that turn out again?
"without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female." What "sex" constitutes majority of individuals in a healthy bee hive? What a surprise (NOT) that the temple whores of Delphi chose the bee to represent them.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. It's not Jefferson's bones that have captured my attention - but the Ideas he was used to convey, that somebody took the time to write in stone. No Domina, I mock the human religiously concocted created things, and their state-established Temple-perching caeSARean creators, who would assume dominion over my relationship to Him.
What a surprise (NOT) that the temple whores of Delphi chose the bee to represent them. You must be a hoot at weddings and Barmitzvahs.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)
More of a Bzzzzzzz than a hoot.
And yet you have this very strange need to get in people's faces over religious views they have. Why is that? Why is this strange need of yours so virulent and what caused this? Were you an alter boy who was given 'special attention' by the priest?
Why is that? Why is this strange need of yours so virulent and what caused this? Were you an alter boy who was given 'special attention' by the priest?
You mean your spamming of threads with post after post of words (prayers) and stone monuments (idols) dedicated to and attributed Jefferson (your god) are NOT acts of worship? Tsk. Our God is a jealous God.
Comments (155 - 187) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest God is Sovereign.
#116. To: VxH (#108)
#117. To: redleghunter (#112)
#118. To: A K A Stone (#116)
So basically you are saying. You don't have a right to live. Got ya.
#119. To: VxH (#118)
Do Americans have the right to pursue the Truth
#120. To: VxH (#111)
Have they figured out the only reason they have a penis and scrotum is because of the effects of Androgen hormones?
#121. To: A K A Stone (#119)
(Edited)
without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female.
IIRC it was a biological FACT being taught in an Animal Behavior course at the LCMS' Concordia Seward facility circa 1983.
#122. To: VxH (#121)
Is that a fabrication?
#123. To: VxH (#111)
Male and female sex organs develop from the same tissue. Whether this tissue becomes male organs or female organs depends on the chromosomes and the presence or absence of male hormones.
#124. To: VxH, A K A Stone (#114)
Are your offspring aware that they'd have female appearing genitalia if it weren't for the effects of Androgen hormones?
#125. To: VxH (#115)
God is Sovereign.
#126. To: redleghunter (#120)
About 4 months later (humans) the sexual organs under go sexual differentiation based on the XX or XY sequence.
For Example: Woman born with no womb gives birth to miracle twins
Hayley Haynes, who was born with no reproductive organs, has given birth to twins after specialist treatment to grow a womb
#127. To: A K A Stone, VxH (#117)
Do you believe that VxH has anything to offer those of us who seek the truth.
#128. To: VxH, redleghunter (#114)
I have a Truth fetish.
#129. To: redleghunter (#124)
If both my sons had XX chromosomes at conception they would be girls. Welcome to procreation 101.
#130. To: redleghunter (#125)
then what is your view?
#131. To: VxH (#115)
God is Sovereign.
#132. To: VxH, liberator, A K A Stone (#126)
And yet without Androgen, or with Insensitivity to Androgen - the genitalia don't undergo that differentiation, do they.
#133. To: VxH, redleghunter, A K A Stone (#130)
My view is I'm an infidel who enjoys America's protections against state-established religious coercion.
#134. To: A K A Stone (#122)
Doesn't matter concerning if God created us or not.
#135. To: VxH (#129)
If they were XY and either produced no androgen hormones or were Androgen Insensitive -- what would they APPEAR to be?
#136. To: redleghunter, VxH, A K A Stone (#132)
Has bunk to do with evolution vs. creation.
"And yet his [Adam's] sons, and their sons, and etc... had genitalia that only present themselves with male form in the presence of Androgen hormones.
#137. To: VxH, liberator, A K A Stone (#130)
My view is I'm an infidel who enjoys America's protections against state-established religious coercion
#138. To: redleghunter (#132)
A birth defect.
That's not a birth defect, it's a biological human reproductive FACT.
#139. To: redleghunter (#137)
Then you should be railing against the US established religion of secular humanistic atheism.
#140. To: Liberator, Vicomte13 (#136)
Otherwise, they'd have been born as female appearing... wait for it... EUNUCHS."
#141. To: VxH, redleghunter, A K A Stone (#102)
VxH: "So did Adam have female genitals before or after your myth formed him out of the mud?"
#142. To: redleghunter, VxH (#137)
You should be railing against the US established religion of secular humanistic atheism. That is the established 'church' in the US today.
#143. To: redleghunter (#140)
(Edited)
#144. To: redleghunter, Vicomte13 (#140)
(Edited)
Yes there is a eunuch fetish presented. Poor Vic used to be the sole "temple eunuch" target. Now horizons are expanding:)
#145. To: VxH, liberator, A K A Stone (#138)
without the effects of male hormones — the genitals develop as female."
#146. To: VxH (#139)
Been there, railed against that.
#147. To: Liberator (#144)
(Edited)
(I am a "temple eunuch"...er I mean, Spartacus!)
#148. To: redleghunter (#145)
(Edited)
Only if you see the goal of procreation is to produce eunuchs. It is not.
Your religious / human manufactured opinions regarding the "goals" of nature are irrelevant to nature. Just as water freezes at 32 degrees so too the fact that, without the effects of androgen hormones, human genitals develop as female - is self-evident, and stands regardless of opinion to the contrary. 
#149. To: Liberator (#146)
(Edited)
Truth is, you're a necromantic of Thomas Jefferson's bones who worships false idols and a false religion.
And you mock the Lord...
#150. To: VxH, liberator, A K A Stone, Vicomte13 (#148)
What "sex" constitutes majority of individuals in a healthy bee hive?
#151. To: redleghunter (#150)
(Edited)
You must be a hoot at weddings and Barmitzvahs.
#152. To: VxH (#130)
My view is I'm an infidel who enjoys America's protections against state-established religious coercion.
#153. To: Dead Culture Watch, VxH, releghunter, A K A Stone (#152)
And yet you have this very strange need to get in people's faces over religious views they have.
#154. To: VxH (#149)
(Edited)
It's not Jefferson's bones that have captured my attention - but the Ideas he was used to convey, that somebody took the time to write in stone.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]