[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles

Title: Most Evangelical Christians Say Science and Religion Can Coexist
Source: Yahoo!
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/most-evangeli ... eligion-coexist-124417864.html
Published: Mar 18, 2015
Author: Megan Gannon
Post Date: 2015-03-18 10:26:58 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 4139
Comments: 19

Never mind the outspoken Christian leaders who reject the Big Bang and human evolution; nearly 70 percent of rank-and-file evangelicals in the United States say they don't see religion and science as being totally at odds, a new survey found.

"Although many politicians and the media at large portray evangelicals as distrustful of science, we found that this is more myth than reality," Elaine Howard Ecklund, a sociologist at Rice University who orchestrated the survey, said in a statement.

Among evangelical Christians, about 48 percent said they see science and religion as complementary to one another, while 21 percent think science and religion refer to different aspects of reality and see them as entirely independent of one another, the survey found. [Creationism vs. Evolution: 6 Big Battles]

Still, the share of evangelical Christians who think religion and science are in conflict (and see themselves on the side of religion) is 29 percent — more than double the figure in the general population (14 percent), the study found. Overall, 38 percent of adults in the United States view religion and science as complementary, while 35 percent view science and religion as separate.

Though a majority of evangelicals don't see science and religion in conflict, many of them still believe in ideas that science doesn't support. For example, about 43 percent of evangelical Christians (compared with about 22 percent of the general population) believe that God created the universe and all life inside it within the last 10,000 years, according to the survey. (By studying the oldest light in the cosmos, scientists, meanwhile, have determined that the universe is about 13.8 billion years old.) And 42 percent of evangelical Americans support teaching creationism in schools instead of evolution, compared with about 18 percent of the general population who said the same.

Ecklund and her colleagues think the perception that evangelical Christians are unfriendly to science might hinge on just a few of these hot-button issues, like creationism. The evangelicals who saw science and religion as incompatible often fixated on human origins, the study found. One survey participant who was part of a largely white evangelical congregation in Houston, Texas, explained this point of view to the interviewers:

"As a Christian, creation — really it's all or nothing. Either the entire Bible's right or it's all wrong. Either everything inside of it is 100 percent accurate, or none of it is. So if creation could be disproven … So just completely take that away, that just devastates my entire way of life, my entire being. … Nobody wants to change. Christians don't want to change, and atheists don't want to change."

Focusing on evolution/creation has also narrowed the conversation about the relationship that religious people have with science, according to Ecklund and colleagues. The perception that evangelical Christians are hostile toward science might only be propagated with events like last year's televised debate between science popularizer Bill Nye and creationist Ken Ham, who believes the Bible's Book of Genesis is a literal description of the creation of Earth, the researchers said. But these heated debates don't necessarily reflect the way average evangelicals think.

Ecklund and colleagues surveyed more than 10,000 adults from across the country about their views on religion and science. They also conducted 315 in-depth interviews with Americans of different faiths. Ecklund presented the findings last week in Washington, D.C., during an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference on religion and science.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#9. To: Willie Green (#0) (Edited)

"Either the entire Bible's right or it's all wrong. Either everything inside of it is 100 percent accurate, or none of it is."

This is an emotional position, not a logical one.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-03-18   14:18:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13, ALL (#9)

This is an emotional position, not a logical one.

Jesus consistently treats Old Testament historical narratives as straightforward records of fact. He refers to Abel (Luke 11:51), Noah (Matt. 24:37-39; Luke 17:26, 27), Abraham (John 8:56), the institution of circumcision (John 7:22; cf. Gen. 17:10-12; Lev. 12:3), Sodom and Gomorrah (Matt. 10:15; 11:23, 24; Luke 10:12), Lot (Luke 17:28-32), Isaac and Jacob (Matt. 8:11; Luke 13:28), manna (John 6:31, 49, 58), the snake in the desert (John 3: 14), David eating the consecrated bread (Matt. 12:3, 4; Mark 2:25, 26; Luke 6:3, 4), David as a psalm writer (Matt. 22:43; Mark 12:36; Luke 20:42), Solomon (Matt. 6:29; 12:42; Luke 11:31; 12:27), Elijah (Luke 4:25, 26), Elisha (Luke 4:27), Jonah (Matt. 12:39-41; Luke 11:29, 30, 32), and Zechariah (Luke 11:51). The last passage brings out Jesus' sense of the unity of history and His grasp of its wide sweep. His eye surveys the whole course of history from "the creation of the world" to "this generation." He repeatedly refers to Moses as the giver of the Law (Matt. 8:4; 19:8; Mark 1:44; 7:10; 10:5; 12:26; Luke 5:14; 20:37; John 5:46; 7:19). He frequently mentions the sufferings of the true prophets (Matt. 5:12; 13:57; 21:34-36; 23:29-37; Mark 6:4 [cf. Luke 4:24; John 4:44]; 12:2-5; Luke 6:23; 11:47-51; 13:34; 20:10-12) and comments on the popularity of the false prophets (Luke 6:26). He sets the stamp of His approval on such significant passages as Genesis 1 and 2 (Matt. 19:4, 5; Mark 10:6-8).

GarySpFC  posted on  2015-03-20   2:23:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

#13. To: GarySpFC (#12)

Yes, Jesus does. And so do I. What does not work, however, is the position that every single word of Scripture that we have is exactly right or its all wrong.

No two manuscripts of Scripture are identical. If we take the emotional position that Scripture is letter perfect, then we invalidate it, because Scripture is entirely letter imperfect. God did not protect and preserve for us letter-perfect texts. Rather he got his message across, the essential, in texts that vary between every one.

It is no help to say that there is no doctrinal difference in the variants if one's very doctrine is that it's all letter perfect. Because it isn't letter perfect. The correct doctrine is that God didn't give letter-perfect inspiration, he painted more broadly, in themes, analog, not digital.

If one takes the "every word is exactly right or it's all 100% wrong, then one has embraced an emotional, exaggerated false doctrine that destroys Christian belief, because God did not in fact let us have 100% perfect, uncorrupted texts. He protected the essence of his message, and that is what we have to accept: the essence. If we go farther and insist that it is all perfect, we are not telling the truth, and we are indulging in bibliolatry.

Further, there are parts of the text that are clearly historical, and there are other parts that are clearly poetic. And there are parts that are figures of speech and not literally true, but that are figuratively true.

Example: Jesus says that the smallest seed is the mustard seed. No it isn't. There are much smaller seeds. So, does that vitiate the Bible? If one takes the position that everything in the Bible is 100% true then yes, Jesus' botanical inaccuracy destroys the whole Bible. God is wrong on a detail, and therefore the whole Bible is crap. That's the emotional and ridiculous position that the pastor took and that I am forcibly rejecting as foolish, because it IS foolish.

Jesus was not "incorrect". The smallest seed that a Palestinian Jewish farmer was likely to deal with was a mustard seed. People planted mustard, and mustard was the smallest seed in the agricultural arsenal. Within that bounded world - whose bounds Jesus did not spell out because perfect accuracy of speech is an obsession of 20th Century lawyers, not people listening to a religious parable, and not God either, apparently,

Further, our translations are themselves not perfectly accurate. We've been over the ground of olam meaning "to the unknown" or "to the horizon", and not "forever". It makes major doctrinal differences in understanding if one mistranslates or misinterprets words like that.

Is "light" photon emissions, is it energy, or is it order? The word is "or", and it is the root of "order". For someone to assert that "or" in Hebrew means photonic visible light is just that, an assertion, an assertion based on emotional preference. It is not "true" in the sense of provable. God may be speaking of periods of order and disorder, because or and Hhosekh have those meanings. Just because English people traditionally translated concepts as visible light and visible darkness and built doctrines on it that are very old means nothing.

Genesis 1 is accurate, as far as God gave it, but what it precisely says is hard, not easy. And the accuracy of all of it is "good enough for God" accuracy, but not good enough accuracy for a modern computer, which must have precise, delineated ones and zeroes in order to be able to compute. The limits of binary modern logic let machines run, but do not embrace the nuances of Scripture.

And at any rate, the emotional "It's all 100% right or it's 100% wrong" position of the pastor means that HE has forced the answer: then it's 100% wrong, because the mustard seed is not even close to being the smallest seed. It's a bad doctrine that is destined to fail, and rather than try to support it, I'm going to torpedo it and return to reality: God did not speak in binary code. He spoke in broad, colorful analog. Reduce the Bible to binary, and you end up with false gibberish.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-03-20 06:49:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com