[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Why GOP 'Insiders' Thwart Conservative Reformers
Source: Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... ervative-reformers_888858.html
Published: Mar 17, 2015
Author: Jay Cost
Post Date: 2015-03-17 09:56:49 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 11488
Comments: 67

Why GOP 'Insiders' Thwart Conservative Reformers
It's the political structure, stupid.

Tom Cotton’s letter to the Iranian regime has spurred furious blowback from liberals. They want the president to cut a deal with Iran, and Cotton’s letter gets in the way; thus, they’ve engaged in a specious fight over inter-branch protocol. Never mind that the president is looking to sign an agreement with an enemy without the advice and consent of the Senate. And never mind that Democrats have made similar overtures to foreign governments before.

It’s like that old lawyer’s adage: If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law, pound the law. If you have neither, pound the table. Tut-tutting over Cotton’s letter is a classic example of pounding the table.

Which is why this item from Friday’s Politico was so striking:

One-third of Republican insiders believe that Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and his GOP colleagues — including several potential presidential candidates — crossed the line when they published an open letter to Iranian leaders warning about a possible nuclear deal….

“The GOP letter — while sound in substance — caused the debate to shift from the administration’s wrongheadedness to the GOP’s tactics,” said a New Hampshire Republican, who — like all 92 respondents this week — completed the survey anonymously in order to speak candidly. “That’s not helpful.”

It manifestly did not “cross the line,” as Steve Hayes’s editorial in this week’s WEEKLY STANDARD makes clear. What it did was rock the boat, which is something that a wide swath of Republican “insiders” never want to do.

This has been a persistent pattern. Conservatives come forward with bold proposals to reform the way government works -- or at least stop some egregious abuse -- and GOP insiders warn of dire consequences. We’ve seen that on the farm bill, on the Export-Import Bank, on the Paul Ryan budget plan, on executive amnesty, and now on Iran. Don’t make waves, they warn, lest we risk the majority!

But what is the point of a majority, if not to reform the government? That is the conservative attitude, at any rate, but there is a different view that, unfortunately, has wide purchase in quarters of the Republican party. It is the belief that the majority is a good thing because it means Republicans get to decide how the government pie gets sliced up. Upsetting the apple cart threatens the chairmanship of the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee of Appropriations, which simply cannot be risked under this view. Otherwise, Democrats will get to decide how all that tasty government cheese is allocated!

This is a very old view within the Republican party. In my new book, A Republic No More: Big Government and the Rise of American Political Corruption, I tell the story of how the Republican party got in tight with business interests looking for government rents. One particular anecdote is apt. The following is a letter from George Edmunds, a “liberal” (for the time) Republican who -- heaven forbid! -- actually wanted the railroads to pay back their government loans in a timely fashion. Enter James G. Blaine, the famous orator and party leader, to thwart the effort. Edmunds complained bitterly:

It is my opinion that Mr. Blaine acts as the attorney of Jay Gould (head of the Union Pacific railroad). Whenever (Senator Allen) Thurman and I have settled upon legislation to bring the Pacific railroads to terms of equity with the government, up has jumped James G. Blaine, musket in hand, from behind the breastworks of Gould’s lobby, to fire in our backs.

This is still a common occurrence in the Republican party. When conservatives try to reform government in ways that upend the established order, they end up getting undermined by  . . . Republicans.

What can we possibly do about this? Three things.

First, we have to stop focusing so relentlessly on the personalities of politicians. Edmunds and Blaine are long gone, after all -- yet the same dynamic persists. That suggests the problem has more to do with the rules of the game than with its players.

To that end, the second thing we need to do is reform Congress. Today, the institution is premised on a conflict of interest -- members of both parties trade public policy to the private groups that subsidize their campaigns and provide for their post-political careers. This lends itself inevitably to the don’t-rock-the-boat mentality, particularly when it has to do with corporate welfare like the Ex-Im Bank, corporate tax loopholes, or the farm bill.

Third, we have to reform the GOP nomination process, not just for the presidency but also the Congress. That’s the other end of the conflict of interest: politicians trade public policy because they believe (correctly) it will get them reelected. If we change the way those elections take place, we can change their incentives.

Don’t get me wrong. The Edmunds quote illustrates that this is an old problem within the GOP, and it admits of no easy solutions. But the only way to improve the Republican party, to make it truly a vehicle for a conservative reform agenda, is to change the rules by which it operates. Otherwise, our efforts to fix the government will be met with fire from our “friends,” straight into our backs.


Poster Comment:

Jay Cost explains why the GOP elite is so cowardly and inclined toward Big Gov policies while spewing conservative platitudes. More importantly, he points out there is no reason why the GOP should be left in the hands of these people and why and how the GOP should be reformed to be more conservative in policy and law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

Conservatives come forward with bold proposals to reform the way government works

Privatize safety net and government in general to benefit the rich?

A Pole  posted on  2015-03-17   10:04:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A Pole (#1)

Privatize safety net and government in general to benefit the rich?

You say that as though the present system is not a hotbed of corruption and cartel operations that rely on government to maintain their monopoly power and exclude potential rivals.

In fact, relying on government to do so much with so little accountability is a recipe for waste and inefficiency. And the problems go from being temporary to being entrenched special interests as we see with Big Bank and with the Veteran's Administration and countless other ineffective and untouchable agencies.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-17   10:10:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#2)

In fact, relying on government to do so much with so little accountability is a recipe for waste and inefficiency

Representative government is at least formally accountable to the people. For the rich, the people are not masters but a commodity to be exploited or discarded at will.

Privatization means transfer of wealth from the people to the rich.

A Pole  posted on  2015-03-17   10:45:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#5. To: A Pole (#4)

"Representative government is at least formally accountable to the people."

It's accountable to the majority.

And what will happen when 51% tell the other 49% that they demand free health care, free food, free college education, free housing, etc.?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-03-17 10:56:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A Pole (#4)

"Privatization means transfer of wealth from the people to the rich."

Privatization means "the rich" no longer have to pay 90% of the taxes to support the parasites.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-03-17 11:01:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: A Pole (#4)

For the rich, the people are not masters but a commodity to be exploited or discarded at will.

Privatization means transfer of wealth from the people to the rich.

Here is one of the problems in this world. Maybe stupid people who believe crap like you just wrote shouldn't vote. I mean why should a moron have as much say as someone who has accomplished something?

If you are on welfare you should not get a vote. It isn't right to vote for someone elses things they worked for. Anyone can be rich if they do the right things. So quit stealing from smart people and giving it to lazy morons.

The system you advocate is contrary to our constitution. It is in line with the Soviet Union.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-03-17 11:13:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com