International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Most Chinese Say Their Military Can Crush America in Battle
Source:
The National Interest
URL Source: http://www.nationalinterest.org/blo ... can-crush-america-battle-12414
Published: Mar 14, 2015
Author: Zachery Keck
Post Date: 2015-03-14 13:37:26 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 20437
Comments: 95
The vast majority of Chinese citizens believe the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could seize islands in the East and South China Seas, even if the U.S. military were to intervene in the conflicts. No less than 87 percent of respondents said that the Chinese military already possessed the capability to take back the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands from Japan, according to a recent public opinion poll. When asked whether they still believed the PLA could achieve this objective if the U.S. intervened in the conflict, 74 percent said yes. The numbers were much the same for the South China Sea. When asked whether they believed the PLA could militarily take back disputed islands in the South China Sea, 85.6 percent of respondents said that China’s military could achieve this objective. Even if the U.S. military intervened on behalf of the Southeast Asian nations, about 73 percent of respondents said they still believed the Chinese military would prevail. These were just some of the results of a recent survey published by Andrew Chubb and the Perth USAsia Centre (h/t ASPI’s The Strategist), entitled: “Exploring China’s ‘Maritime Consciousness’ Public Opinion on the South and East China Sea Disputes.” The poll, which was the first in what will be an annual poll on Chinese views of the island disputes, was based on phone interviews conducted with 1,413 adult residents of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Changsha and Chengdu. Despite the confidence in their country’s military’s capabilities, a slight majority of respondents said they did not want to go to war over disputed islands in either the South or East China Seas. When asked whether it was in China’s national interest to use military force to take back the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, which Japan administers but Beijing also claims, 55.5 percent of respondents said that it was not. Just over 33 percent disagreed while the rest were unsure or didn’t answer. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed that it was not in China’s interest to use military force to take back disputed islands in the South China Sea, compared to 33.5 percent who disagreed. The rest were unsure or did not answer. The survey participants also didn’t rank the island disputes as particularly important compared with many domestic issues. When the pollsters presented participants with a list of nine issues and asked them to choose the five most important, around 51 percent of respondents selected “island issues with neighboring countries” as one of their choices. Corruption, rich-poor disparity, food and drug safety, moral issues and environmental pollution all ranked higher. Notably, however, the island disputes ranked considerably higher than reunification with Taiwan, which only 22 percent of respondents selected as among their top five issues. The overwhelming belief that the PLA would prevail in a conflict with the United States in the East or South China Seas could make it easier for Chinese leaders to gain support for aggressive policies. At the same time, it could very well make Party leaders more weary of actually initiating a conflict, given the domestic repercussions for them if China is defeated.
Poster Comment: Only because Wall Street helped them... 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
#1. To: Willie Green (#0)
They're right. They have competence, determination, seriousness, and superior numbers working for them. Americans have a population of babyfied soft pussys from top to bottom.
Good. The world would be better off with a weak America that does not sow destruction and revolution overseas.
The world would be better off with a weak America that does not sow destruction and revolution overseas. I dunno what you're smoking, but for decades the USA neutralized the Soviet/ChiCom threat, rebuilt Europe and Japan, and increased the standard of living for hundreds of millions. Reagan's America is Day, while 0buma's America is Night. Do not conflate the two. 0buma's philosophy by far matches your very own. A virtuous Pax America void can only be filled by a murderous Commie China, bloody Islam, or reptilian Russia. YET, why is your hypocritical, parasitic, treasonous, treachorous azz STILL sucking at the teat of the USA, Destro?
I piss on Reagan's America which created the Islamic jihad we fight today.
I piss on you. The islamic jihad was 1,400 years ago by a shithead named Mohammed and has continued steadfastly since then.
I piss on you. The islamic jihad was 1,400 years ago by a shithead named Mohammed and has continued steadfastly since then. The Islamic jihad of today was organized and trained and trained to organize via the Reagan effort to fight the USSR via Islamic jihad. Try to run from that truth.
I piss on you. The islamic jihad was 1,400 years ago by a shithead named Mohammed and has continued steadfastly since then. The Islamic jihad of today was organized and trained and trained to organize via the Reagan effort to fight the USSR via Islamic jihad. There is no islamic jihad of "today" that differs from the purpose and momentum of jihad from the last fourteen hundred years. Reagan used a small obscure group to confront communist jihad and break the back of the Soviet military. It was a smart move. You argue as though Reagan created an enormous tide of supermen that is behind every victory since then. You're crazy.
That's how one justifies hating a great president, such as Reagan. You gotta be KILLary Clinton libtard to speak well of Carter, likewise, you gotta be KILLary Clinton libtard to speak bad of Reagan. I really don't know why posters mask their level of liberal. Be loud and be proud... it is what it is.
From U.S. the ABC’s of Jihad Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway Washington Post Staff Writers Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01 In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.
There are no replies to Comment # 32. End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestMost Chinese Say Their Military Can Crush America in Battle
#2. To: rlk (#1)
. Americans have a population of babyfied soft pussys from top to bottom.
#8. To: Pericles (#2)
(Edited)
Good.
#16. To: Liberator (#8)
#17. To: Pericles (#16)
I piss on Reagan's America which created the Islamic jihad we fight today.
#18. To: rlk (#17)
I piss on Reagan's America which created the Islamic jihad we fight today.
#28. To: Pericles (#18)
(Edited)
I piss on Reagan's America which created the Islamic jihad we fight today.
#29. To: rlk (#28)
You argue as though Reagan created an enormous tide of supermen that is behind every victory since then. You're crazy.
#32. To: GrandIsland (#29)
https://supportdanielboyd.wordpress.com/usa-printed-textbooks-support-jihad- in-afghanistan-and-pakistan/
Replies to Comment # 32.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]