[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
911 Title: The 9/11 Commission Didn’t Believe the Government … So Why Should We? The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into a real 9/11 investigation: No wonder the Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 Bob Graham and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a PERMANENT 9/11 commission or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it. Some examples of obstruction of justice into the 9/11 investigation include: Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence
.The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigations refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers. 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote: Those who knew about those videotapes and did not tell us about them obstructed our investigation. The chief lawyer for Guantanamo litigation Vijay Padmanabhan said that torture of 9/11 suspects was widespread. And Susan J. Crawford the senior Pentagon official overseeing the military commissions at Guantánamo told Bob Woodward: We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture. Indeed, some of the main sources of information were tortured right up to the point of death. Moreover, the type of torture used by the U.S. on the Guantanamo suspects is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating false confessions. (and see this, this, this and this). And according to NBC News: If the 9/11 Commissioners themselves doubt the information from the government, why should we believe it?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Given what the others said, they should have resigned as well, rather than allow their names to be placed on a fake report. They knew they weren't getting the full story, that much larger things were being hidden from them deliberately, that witnesses were perjuring themselves and submitting false or deliberately misleading evidence. I think the major 911 scandal is the high-level involvement of the Saudis, like top members of the royal family and Saudi military/intel connections.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|