[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: The Fourth Amendment Is Dead
Source: National Motorists Association
URL Source: http://blog.motorists.org/the-fourth-amendment-is-dead/
Published: Jan 12, 2008
Author: James Baxter
Post Date: 2015-02-14 10:23:03 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1693
Comments: 13

search By James Baxter, NMA President

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution has been strangled with convoluted legal rationalizations, riddled with bullets in the form of Supreme Court decisions and drawn and quartered by “creative” law enforcement interpretations.

This old and oft referred to amendment, an attempt to protect the privacy and property rights of individuals, is dead. Driving any more nails into its rotted casket is a redundant waste of time, but the US Supreme Court persists.

For motorists, or anyone on a public road or sidewalk, the illusion of personal privacy is but a dim memory. Random searches, based on the flimsiest excuses, roadblocks, “frisking” and “patting down” passengers or pedestrians, because they “might have a weapon” and roadside interrogations are now all quite legal, or are carried out as if they are because no one dare argue to the contrary.

The US Supreme Court is currently hearing a case dealing with a Virginia man who was “arrested” for driving with a suspended license, even though the state of Virginia does not authorize arrests for minor traffic crimes, which is what driving on a suspended license is considered.

The court long ago held that once a person is arrested they are subject to being searched. If their car is within finding distance, it too can be searched. This Court ruled in 2001 that a person could be arrested for violating virtually any traffic law, including the failure to wear a seat belt. And, once arrested you have no fourth amendment protections.

For all practical purposes, this gives the police the power to stop, arrest, and search anyone they feel like “checking out” or harassing. Arabs might be the flavor of the day on Monday, Tuesday it’s blacks in luxury cars and on Wednesday it’s young men driving sport compacts.

The options/excuses for a stop are endless; burned out bulbs, unused seat belts, (real or imagined) failure to properly signal, touching the center line, hitting the shoulder, two MPH over the speed limit, driving too slow, rolling a stop sign, rolling a right on red, failure to yield to a pedestrian, or talking on a cell phone (inattentive driving).

If the police want to stop you, they can. If they want to arrest you, they can. If they want to search you and your vehicle and your passengers, they can.

That’s how the land’s highest court has ruled. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

Traffic laws are written and enforced by each state. If you don't like the laws in your state, either change them or move.

Who in their right mind looks to the federal government to solve a state issue? What happened to "state's rights"?

Oh, wait. I know. State's rights are good when the state favors the things we support. When they don't, then we can go running to the feds and hide behind their skirt.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-02-15   11:10:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite continues to support Statist dogma (#1)

If the police want to stop you, they can. If they want to arrest you, they can. If they want to search you and your vehicle and your passengers, they can. -- That’s how the land’s highest court has ruled.

So says the NMA President.. Here's the pitiful opinion of a LF statist:

Traffic laws are written and enforced by each state. If you don't like the laws in your state, either change them or move.

No, we all have a constitutional duty to insist that States comply with our constitutional rights..

Who in their right mind looks to the federal government to solve a state issue? What happened to "state's rights"?

States have no rights, they have powers. In this case, those powers are being exceeded.

Oh, wait. I know. State's rights are good when the state favors the things we support. When they don't, then we can go running to the feds and hide behind their skirt.

A States powers are good when they comply with our Constitution.. When they don't, it is every citizens duty to object.

Why is it you don't object? Ever...?

tpaine  posted on  2015-02-15   11:50:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#1)

All states are bound by the fourth amendment. So it is state and federal.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-02-15   11:53:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: tpaine (#2)

A States powers are good when they comply with our Constitution.. When they don't, it is every citizens duty to object.

This must be based on the fact that your definition of "unreasonable" and "probable cause" is different than the USSC.

Surely you realize that the definition of "unreasonable" is subjective... and "PC" can be based on a multitude of things.

Who should be the decision maker for legal definitions, regarding the criminal justice systems and the constitution? You? Mr. White? ... who?

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-02-15   12:03:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite continues to support Statist dogma (#1)

If the police want to stop you, they can. If they want to arrest you, they can. If they want to search you and your vehicle and your passengers, they can. -- That’s how the land’s highest court has ruled.

So says the NMA President.. Here's the pitiful opinion of a LF statist:

Traffic laws are written and enforced by each state. If you don't like the laws in your state, either change them or move.

No, we all have a constitutional duty to insist that States comply with our constitutional rights..

Who in their right mind looks to the federal government to solve a state issue? What happened to "state's rights"?

States have no rights, they have powers. In this case, those powers are being exceeded.

Oh, wait. I know. State's rights are good when the state favors the things we support. When they don't, then we can go running to the feds and hide behind their skirt.

A States powers are good when they comply with our Constitution.. When they don't, it is every citizens duty to object.

Why is it you don't object? Ever...?

tpaine  posted on  2015-02-15   12:06:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#3)

"All states are bound by the fourth amendment. So it is state and federal."

Any state can write a law more protective of 4th amendment rights.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-02-15   12:10:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GrandIsland (#4)

misterwhite --- State's rights are good when the state favors the things we support. When they don't, then we can go running to the feds and hide behind their skirt.

A States powers are good when they comply with our Constitution.. When they don't, it is every citizens duty to object.

Surely you realize that the definition of "unreasonable" is subjective... and "PC" can be based on a multitude of things.

Yep, and the SCOTUS has been wrestling with that definition since the founding.

Who should be the decision maker for legal definitions, regarding the criminal justice systems and the constitution? You? Mr. White? ... who

In the really long run, the people decide, thru the amendment process. And we're still arguing about what the 14th decided.

tpaine  posted on  2015-02-15   12:17:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: tpaine (#7)

To: GrandIsland misterwhite --- State's rights are good when the state favors the things we support. When they don't, then we can go running to the feds and hide behind their skirt. A States powers are good when they comply with our Constitution.. When they don't, it is every citizens duty to object.

Surely you realize that the definition of "unreasonable" is subjective... and "PC" can be based on a multitude of things. Yep, and the SCOTUS has been wrestling with that definition since the founding.

Who should be the decision maker for legal definitions, regarding the criminal justice systems and the constitution? You? Mr. White? ... who In the really long run, the people decide, thru the amendment process. And we're still arguing about what the 14th decided.

After reviewing your response, (and I'm honestly not trying to be a smart ass or a trouble maker).... I get the same feeling like one would get if their sister was their prom date. How uneventful... I feel no better off after the prom then before I went.

So... what do we do while we are in this limbo... as LE encounters these grey areas of subjectiveness, while trying to tackle the everchanging world of criminality?

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-02-15   12:29:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GrandIsland, misterwhite, Y'ALL (#8)

Who should be the decision maker for legal definitions, regarding the criminal justice systems and the constitution? You? Mr. White? ... who

In the really long run, the people decide, thru the amendment process. And we're still arguing about what the 14th decided. --And whether income taxation is constitutional.

After reviewing your response, (and I'm honestly not trying to be a smart ass or a trouble maker).... I get the same feeling like one would get if their sister was their prom date. How uneventful... I feel no better off after the prom then before I went.

Gee, how awful for you. IMO, you're being a little bit like misterwhite, who is so sure of his own political correctness, that he expects perfection of everyone else. I sure don't have all the answers..

So... what do we do while we are in this limbo... as LE encounters these grey areas of subjectiveness, while trying to tackle the everchanging world of criminality?

I'd suggest you review the principles written in defense of the Constitution, and its presumption of individual liberties, and try to honor and defend them.

tpaine  posted on  2015-02-15   12:55:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#6)

Any state can write a law more protective of 4th amendment rights.

On what planet? Chyeah -- Just to be overturned by a federal court or single fascist or queer judge.

Liberator  posted on  2015-02-15   15:30:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: tpaine, misterwhite (#5)

Why is it you don't object? Ever...?

Because MW worships as an altar boy for the State-Run church.

Liberator  posted on  2015-02-15   15:31:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: misterwhite (#1)

Who in their right mind looks to the federal government to solve a state issue?

Social activits groups? The ACLU? SPLC? Sharpton, Jackson ring ab bell? Remember the Tray-Tray Martin case? Or maybe the Ferguson, MO case?

Did you forget how in both cases swarms of fedgub agents stepped into each fray, shoving aside State authorities over a cliff?

Liberator  posted on  2015-02-15   15:37:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Liberator, AKA Stone, Y'ALL (#10)

A K A Stone (#3) --- "All states are bound by the fourth amendment. So it is state and federal."

misterwhite --- Any state can write a law more protective of 4th amendment rights.

On what planet? --- Liberator

Left unsaid by whitey is his main communitarian theory, -- that States have the power to ignore some individual rights.

tpaine  posted on  2015-02-15   16:10:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com