Business
See other Business Articles
Title: He’ll Rot For Pot: 55 Years For Weed (Koch bros fight)
Source:
The Daily Beast
URL Source: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl ... face-of-the-koch-campaign.html
Published: Feb 8, 2015
Author: Tim Mak
Post Date: 2015-02-08 00:24:27 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 13392
Comments: 39
Weldon Angelos could have hijacked a plane and spent less time in jail. But due to mandatory sentencing laws, the father of two was sentenced to 55 years in jail for selling pot – a term so long even the judge who gave it to him protested its injustice. A group backed by the Koch brothers agrees, and is now fighting to get him out of prison. Angelos is an extreme case: even though the crime was considered non-violent, Angelos carried a firearm during a series of marijuana sales to a Salt Lake City police informant – so federal mandatory minimums required that he be put in jail until he’s 80 years old. Judge Paul Cassell protested the sentence when he was forced to make it in 2004, a move he told The Daily Beast he considers “the most unjust, lengthy sentence that I had to hand down.” At the time of the trial, Cassell noted that Angelos’ sentence exceeded the minimum required for an individual convicted of airline hijacking, detonating a bomb intended to kill bystanders, and the exploitation of a child for pornography. Angelos is now 35 years old and has spent some 11 years behind bars. He has more than 40 years left to go. Even though his crime was non-violent, parole is not an option at the federal level. His only hope for relief from his sentence is an order by the president. “If we’re going to deprive someone of liberty, and deal with the high cost of incarceration, it better solve a problem. And in this case, it doesn’t solve any problem,” argued Mark Osler, Angelos’ lawyer, who filed a clemency petition on his behalf in 2012. This is where the Koch brothers come in. The case is being highlighted by Koch-backed group Generation Opportunity, which targets millenials, in a broader campaign to press for criminal justice reforms this year. They will kick off the campaign with a documentary highlighting Angelos’ predicament, premiering at Washington, D.C.’s Newseum next week. “[This year] offers a unique moment in history in which people of different backgrounds and political leanings are coming together to facilitate a substantive dialogue on how to fix [the criminal justice system],” said Evan Feinberg, the group’s president. “We can work towards a more just system that reflects the rule of law without overcriminalizing non-violent offenses.” The new campaign will target the overcriminalization of non-violent crime, mandatory minimum laws, and helping criminals who have served their sentences reintegrate into society. The demilitarization of police and the excesses of civil asset forfeiture will also be addressed. Generation Opportunity worked with Families Against Mandatory Minimums on the documentary. FAMM founder Julie Stewart was in the room during Angelos’ first sentencing hearing. It was, she said, a severe example of a worrisome trend in the criminal justice system. In 1980, the average drug offense sentence was four years. Now, it’s more than nine years. “Is the defendant twice as bad? Or have we just gone crazy with sentencing? I would say the latter,” Stewart told the Beast. For the Angelos case, she added, “we all know 55 years is too much.” “A lot of people just thought that because of the amount of time my brother was [sentenced to], he had done something terrible, just because of the ignorance that is out there about mandatory sentencing,” said Lisa Angelos, Weldon’s older sister and advocate. “Before the case, I had no idea that this was possible in America.” The judge who was forced to hand down the sentence, Paul Cassell, said the Angelos case is an example of “clear injustice marring the public perception” of the federal courts – and victimizing taxpayers who have to pay to keep him locked up. “We have in place in our country today some very draconian penalties that distort our whole federal sentencing scheme,” Cassell said. “When people look at a case like Weldon Angelos and see that he got 55 years, and they see other cases where victims have gotten direct physical or psychological injuries and don’t see a similar [result] from the system, they start to wonder if the system is irrational.” When he was sent to prison, Angelos’ children were small, now both are in their teens. Without their father, the family fell on hard financial times. His children rarely talk to him, Weldon’s sister says, because they can’t afford a cell phone on which they can be reached. “When I tell him stories about his kids, you can tell how very hard it is for him to hear it… to know that he can’t be here,” Lisa Angelos said. “It’s destroyed him in many ways.” The Angelos’ have waited for more than two years for word on their executive clemency request. The average successful clemency request takes approximately four years, according to his lawyer. Weldon Angelos deserves clemency, Osler said, because his sentencing “doesn’t correlate in this country with what’s wrong, and what those wrongs deserve.” Disclosure: Five years ago, the author received a 10-week Koch Summer Fellowship. Poster Comment: 55 years in jail, for being a capitalist businessman.
via Facebook
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
#4. To: hondo68 (#0)
Breaking the law is something a capitalist businessman avoids. When he does not, it can have drastic implications. For that reason, a capitalist businessman needs to stay attuned to the fact that a business owner can face criminal charges and have to wrestle with the court system after violating laws that lead to his arrest. A capitalist businessman can be held accountable for various criminal acts he commits while operating a business and then serve jail time when convicted. When a capitalist businessman break laws, he sometimes has to face the consequences. Besides facing jail time, a capitalist businessman that sells a product to the public that can be harmful faces the potential consequence of a civil lawsuit and monetary penalties. The consequences in civil lawsuits are monetary penalties. Civil litigation that can end up being costly. Breaking laws have consequences.
The reason for the stiff sentence, is because a firearm possession was involved at the time of the crime. It was that fact that tied the judges hands with a minimum sentence. Also, after the arrest, a search warrant was signed to search another location that was connected to the defendant and the crime... a shipping type duffle bag was found, with "marihuana shake" inside... the duffle bag was big enough to zip two grown adults inside it. He was most likely moving HUGE amounts of marihuana... amount sizes so big, that in 50 years after every state has legal weed possession, it still won't be legal to possess. Also, this defendant was made aware of the case against him, the stiff mandatory sentencing that could be imposed, prior to trial... He was offered a 15 year plea deal... and he rejected it and rolled the dice. He got his constitutionally guaranteed trial by jury... and his peers found him guilty. He deserves what he got. It takes yellow journalism or an anarchist agenda, to truely feel bad for this criminal.
Gee, is that a fact? Then why did this guy get off Scot-free? Oh - he's a cop, never mind. Cop caught with 4 pounds of marijuana at home won’t be charged
I don't think any judge will allow you to use an unrelated drug incident as a defense for sentencing in this case. So why bring more yellow journalism to this post? Start a post about that article... and let's debate the facts of that incident. You should be happy to know that the police POLICED the police in this unrelated case, btw. "The matter came to officials' attention after an officer was assigned in January 2014 to investigate Avila's alleged failure to write more than three dozen police reports, the warrant said. As the investigation continued, internal affairs investigators informed Avila he would be placed on administrative leave for failing to file 37 reports, one of them the report of the marijuana he picked up at the UPS store. When questioned, Avila told investigators that he used 2 pounds of the marijuana to train his police dog in February 2014, and when pressed, he acknowledged there may be more in the trunk of his K-9 patrol car or at his house." It wasn't the police departments fault the officer wasn't charged... the DA felt his evidence wasn't strong enough for a conviction.
Policing the police, is that what you call it? The cops get away with this shit all the time, and yet not one word of outrage from the badge bunnies who infest this site. You know, it's not so much that the individual cops are scumbags, but rather the "us versus them" mentality of the entire police system. Police officers routinely get a free pass on criminal acts that the average citizen would do years of hard time for.
This one was found, caught and did serve a punative sentence of a loss of job and career. The department would have been happy to press charges for the black eye they received... but the DA felt the evidence wouldn't hold up. Maybe the officers constitutional rights were violated, of search and seizure... for a criminal arrest? Not sure why the DA felt the evidence was weak. "Routinely". A word that adds drama to your plight.. without having to serve up cold hard factual figures. Please pick 100 random officers, show which ones didn't break the law in a year period, which ones did and were caught and which ones got away "Scott free" I 100% disagree with "routinely"... So I'd like a percentage. It's the credible thing to do.
There are no replies to Comment # 39. End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest55 years in jail, for being a capitalist businessman.
#14. To: Gatlin (#4)
(Edited)
#29. To: GrandIsland, hondo68, A K A Stone, Gatlin, misterwhite, drug war hypocrites (#14)
The reason for the stiff sentence, is because a firearm possession was involved at the time of the crime.
#31. To: Deckard (#29)
(Edited)
#35. To: GrandIsland (#31)
You should be happy to know that the police POLICED the police
#39. To: Deckard (#35)
(Edited)
Police officers routinely get a free pass on criminal acts that the average citizen would do years of hard time for.
Replies to Comment # 39.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]