911 Audio and video
See other 911 Audio and video Articles
Title: 911 Busted: Lead NIST Engineer caught lying about Molten Metal
Source:
Investigate and Expose 9/11
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
Published: Mar 3, 2009
Author: Investigate and Expose 9/11
Post Date: 2015-01-23 13:40:06 by Operation 40
Keywords: 911, NIST, Liars
Views: 22460
Comments: 40
9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lying John Gross, NIST= Liar
John Gross- Lead NIST Engineer WTC Collapse Investigation
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
#2. To: Operation 40 (#0)
Bull! The heat from the fires was hot enough to weaken the steel, and with the weight of the forces involved I don't doubt for a second the steel beams were bent. That said, there is no way any demolitionist would have used thermite or thermate in the demolition process. The Truthers are committed to the thermite- thermite agenda and will jump off cliffs to perpetuate a lie.
And how many other times in all of history has a fire caused a steel framed building to collapse? For example: At 8:27 p.m. on 9 February 2009, the entire building caught fire on the last day of the festivities marking the Chinese new year and was put out six hours later http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing_Television_Cultural_Center_fire There are countless examples just like the above. Yet there are NO examples of fire causing a steel framed building to collapse. Even NIST Says the exact same thing The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including Philadelphia's One Meridian Plaza, a 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse due to differences in the design of the structural system (see the answer to Question 9). You HAVE read the official NIST reports, haven't you?
WTC 7, 1, and 2 did not collapse due to fires alone, but due to significant damage and fire.
#36. To: GarySpFC (#32)
So, when it comes to WTC7 you don't believe the official conspiracy theory. Got it.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#28. To: GarySpFC (#2)
The heat from the fires was hot enough to weaken the steel, and with the weight of the forces involved I don't doubt for a second the steel beams were bent.
The Beijing Television Cultural Center fire was a massive blaze on 9 February 2009, in the centre of Beijing, involving the uncompleted Television Cultural Center (TVCC) building
The Beijing Cultural Centre building after the fire8. Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone?
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtc7.cfm
#32. To: Operation 40 (#28)
8. Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone? The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including Philadelphia's One Meridian Plaza, a 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse due to differences in the design of the structural system (see the answer to Question 9). http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtc7.cfm
Replies to Comment # 32. WTC 7, 1, and 2 did not collapse due to fires alone, but due to significant damage and fire.
But you believe everything else you've been told by a pack of liars.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]