International News
See other International News Articles
Title: "I Am Paul Craig Roberts" (The neocons are flipping out)
Source:
Lew Rockwell
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/01/ ... enzel/i-am-paul-craig-roberts/
Published: Jan 16, 2015
Author: Robert Wenzel
Post Date: 2015-01-16 05:52:51 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2801
Comments: 15
The neocons are flipping out over a column at the Ron Paul Institute that suggests the Charlie Hebdo Massacre was a false flag operation. Here’s neocon Field Commander Bill Kristol: So what is this? How often does Commander Kristol click over to RPI? There is less than a 60 minute difference between the 2 tweets. I hope the commander is making a donation, though I don’t expect him to come in at the Hero of Peace level. As for the column run by RPI, it was written by Paul Craig Roberts, PCR is a a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. WSJ is, of course, considered by those in the know, the War Street Journal, i.e. an outlet controlled by the neocons. And PCR was an assistant Treasury Secretary during the period neocon favorite Ronald Reagan was president. Is the Commander so infuriated by the column that he is willing to throw under the bus a good soldier during the necon reign of Kristol the Father (Irving)? As for PCR ‘s argument, among the points he makes: The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly trained special forces… Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers… Another puzzle in the official story that remains unreported by the presstitute media is the alleged suicide of a high ranking member of the French Judicial Police who had an important role in the Charlie Hebdo investigation. For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime, decided to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8 (both dates are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the night while writing his report on his investigation. A google search as of 6pm EST January 13 turns up no mainstream US media report of this event. I am not about to make the same charge that PCR is making, but he does make good points when he cites the above facts. PCR’s theory thus deserves publication, debate and analysis. The fact that Commander Kristol is in such a huff over the article, doubles the significance of the article, and it makes me want to declare, “I am Paul Craig Roberts.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Lew misses the point. This is just deliberate rumormongering to chase donors away from Rand Paul in the crucial early donors primary, try to use Ron's ghost, so to speak, to tar Rand and raise questions about whether Rand, as nominee, would have Ron pop out of the woodwork and say something the Dims would make hay out of.
Sure, the server went down after Kristol launched what amounts to a denial-of-service attack on it by tweeting something inflammatory and the rest of the neocon mediaplex, grinning, happily retweeted it to their mindless hordes who then clicked on the link and brought down the Institute's server. So Kristol's minion launches the attack, Kristol tweets it to cause the service to go down, and the Institute can't fight back at all. The neocons especially enjoy bullying a helpless victim and silencing them so no one hears their cries. Kristol is such a raging Canary.
The Most Outrageous 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
So Kristol's minion launches the attack, Kristol tweets it to cause the service to go down, and the Institute can't fight back at all. The neocons especially enjoy bullying a helpless victim and silencing them so no one hears their cries. Kristol is such a raging Canary. That is why I asked if the Ron Paul Institute was associated with Paul or not. The neocons really fear the Paul wing of the GOP will become mainstream because it is anti-foreign involvement and by default of that - not caring enough about Israel. If Israel loses the central place in American foreign policy - put there mostly by religious ferver in American politics rather than any true strategic considerations than Israel is just another foreign country the USA deals with overseas. Another country no more or less important than Nigeria. So I would not be suprised if a neocon paid a Paul staff member to put stuff like the 9/11 truther stuff or racists stuff on the web page to discredit them.
I cannot stand Bill Kristol, or his cohorts. Bunch of CFR aholes! America needs them like a huge dose of the clap!
Ha ha ha. Rand Paul : Rand Paul gave a speech on July 31st promoting his Amendment to eliminate aid to Egypt. (Amendment No. 1739 to S. 1243). The 4-page Amendment didn't mention Israel once, yet the transcript of Paul's speech mentioned Israel no less than 16 times. There were a few revealing tidbits in Paul's speech, such as when Paul admits "There's probably 20 different groups in our country who support the nation of Israel and support them as our ally. I speak to them all the time. I visit with them daily and weekly in our office." Paul also noted:
Yes, he HAS to do that as all politicans have to do that. The politicians did not do this before unless they had Jewish voters in their district and even then they usually did not do this. Neocons who have Israel as their main foreign policy focus fear going back to that ignore or uncaring status that we had as far back as the 80s or 90s (not that long ago - remember Baker's F'em they don't vote for us comment?). I think people forgot that there was a time not too long ago when a politician in congress or the senate could go through their entire career and not visit Israel once.
No, I do not recall that.
I agree,and I ain't all that big a fan os "quick shifting Rand",either.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
I agree. Some people have no shame whatsoever. They will say and do anything they need to say or do in order to get speaking fees,sell books,and appear on teebee as someone with "gravitas". Reminds me of Ann Coulter. Say something controversial,get it spread over the airwaves,and rake in the money from the verbal bombings.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It is only ascribed to Baker. They can provide no proof that he ever wrote it or said it. More of a scurrilous rumor than anything else. I never believed it because Baker, unlike Cheney/Bush, was extremely careful in his remarks and didn't shoot himself in the foot for no good reason. Unlike Bush/Cheney's remarks about Clymer being an a-hole, there is no evidence and no credible witnesses to this supposed utterance.
If that is shocking, what would Kristol think of this? (You have never heard a FED official say anything like this- Ever.) Obama's SEAL Team 6 Coverup - Explosive Paul Craig Roberts Interview Here's a little something that supports Dr. Roberts A witness account of bin Laden's death
It is only ascribed to Baker. They can provide no proof that he ever wrote it or said it. Be that as it may, we always assume Israel was the number one priority of American politicans and foreign policy circles but that is a recent (by recent I am talking about 80s to 90s) thing. The USA was always pro-Israel - I am not arguing otherwise - only that this sudden need to visit Israel, pledge allegiance to Israel at the Wailing Wall, etc all is recent in our political culture. If American foreign policy became detached or isolationist ala the Ron Paul idea then the neocons links with Israel get diminished. How many times has a British PM been to the USA or talked about on talk radio or TV? Bibi is on TV and radio all the time. It seems he is on first name basis with all of the radio talk show hosts. That is very skewed for a small country like Israel. So when a movement like that started by Paul comes along that is 'isilationist' the Israeli neocons feel extremely threatened.
It threatens AIPAC's power, the military-industrial-Israeli complex created by Likud and the neocons. They will hit Rand hard and early.
Is the Commander so infuriated by the column that he is willing to throw under the bus a good soldier during the necon reign of Kristol the Father (Irving)?
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
#4. To: Nexus6 (#3)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#5. To: TooConservative (#2)
(Edited)
Sure, the server went down after Kristol launched what amounts to a denial-of-service attack on it by tweeting something inflammatory and the rest of the neocon mediaplex, grinning, happily retweeted it to their mindless hordes who then clicked on the link and brought down the Institute's server.
#6. To: Deckard (#0)
#7. To: Pericles (#5)
The neocons really fear the Paul wing of the GOP will become mainstream because it is anti-foreign involvement and by default of that - not caring enough about Israel.
-"I've had both private and public discussions with the leaders of Israel"
-"It's about doing things that actually I think would be beneficial to Israel." “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state.
Paul Craig Roberts
They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
#8. To: Deckard (#7)
#9. To: Pericles (#8)
" remember Baker's F'em they don't vote for us comment? "
#10. To: TooConservative (#1)
This is just deliberate rumormongering to chase donors away from Rand Paul in the crucial early donors primary, try to use Ron's ghost, so to speak, to tar Rand and raise questions about whether Rand, as nominee, would have Ron pop out of the woodwork and say something the Dims would make hay out of.
#11. To: Nexus6 (#3)
It isn't neocoms who are laughing at the false flag theory. It's anyone with a functioning brain.
#12. To: Pericles, Deckard (#8)
(not that long ago - remember Baker's F'em they don't vote for us comment?)
#13. To: Deckard (#0)
(TL;DV- The whole thing was a hoax)
Jahangir Khan lived down the street from the "compound"
(Scrubbed from Al Jazeera 2 days before US Network Debut)
#14. To: TooConservative, Deckard, Stoner (#12)
(not that long ago - remember Baker's F'em they don't vote for us comment?)
#15. To: Pericles (#14)
So when a movement like that started by Paul comes along that is 'isolationist' the Israeli neocons feel extremely threatened.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]