[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless

The Deleted Wisdom (1776 Report)

Sicko Transfaggots video

The Englund Gambit Checkmate

20 Minutes Of Black DC Residents Supporting Trump's Federal Takeover!

"Virginia Public Schools Deserve This Reckoning"

"'Pack the Bags, We're Going on a Guilt Trip'—the Secret to the Democrats' Success"

"Washington, D.C., Is a Disgrace"

"Trump Orders New 'Highly Accurate' Census Excluding Illegals"

what a freakin' insane asylum

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: You promised to “defend the Constitution” against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Now what
Source: Volokh Conspiracy
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 15, 2015
Author: Orrin Kerr
Post Date: 2015-01-15 20:23:01 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 1290
Comments: 3

You promised to “defend the Constitution” against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Now what?

Article VI of the Constitution requires Officials to take an oath “to support this Constitution.” Today, 5 U.S.C. 3331 specifies the language of the oath for federal officials. According to this statute, officials must “solemnly swear (or affirm)” that they “will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and that they “will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

The oath required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 actually dates back to 1868, when it was required of former Confederate soldiers. Here’s the text of the 1868 law:

Congress amended the 1868 statute in 1884 so that it applied to all federal officers, not just ones who had taken part in the late rebellion. And the language has stuck around, presently codified at 5 U.S.C. 3331.

So if you’re a federal employee, and you wonder just what your oath actually means, I don’t think it obligates you to oppose constitutional amendments or to take down questionable Christmas displays that you come across. Instead, I think the oath is probably best understood in its historical context as a promise to oppose political reforms outside the Constitution. You have to stay loyal to the government that is based on the Constitution, and you can’t support a rebellion or overthrow of that government. Or at least that’s what I think the historical context suggests, which I tend to think sheds some light on what the oath means.


Poster Comment:

Portions of this article were redacted in order to comply with the 'fair use doctrine'. -- And to satisfy the overly officious ninnies who came over from LP..

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

overly officious ninnies who came over from LP

Like you.

yukon  posted on  2015-01-15   20:26:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tpaine (#0)

" overly officious ninnies who came over from LP.. "

LOL !

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-16   10:23:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: tpaine (#0)

Well according to the Republican/Democratic party's they are defending the constitution and those who claim otherwise are dangerous nuts who need to be watched, spied upon and put on a list.

It's easy to claim that everything you are doing is constitutional when you stack the courts with partisan yes men who put the good of the two party's (i.e. the government) above the good of the people. We're seeing the fruits of that today as very little is unconstitutional anymore. I expect this trend to continue.

If history is any indication it's only a matter of time until those lists they are keeping will be used to the detriment of those on it. What that means is anyone's guess. Being fired for not having the right attitude? Being rounded up and hospitalized for having some sort of mental illness? Having to wear symbols on our clothes to indicate we are not government approved? Being quietly assassinated by various means that wouldn't cause undue attention. I could go on and on but you get the picture.

Of course no one can imagine this happening now and it sounds like kook talk. However, if one were to go back to the 70s and tell them what the government is doing today they would think it kook talk as well. In those days the actions the government has taken was strictly the realm of the USSR or Nazi Germany, not the United States.

Fibr Dog  posted on  2015-01-16   10:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com