[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: You promised to “defend the Constitution” against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Now what
Source: Volokh Conspiracy
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 15, 2015
Author: Orrin Kerr
Post Date: 2015-01-15 20:23:01 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 970
Comments: 3

You promised to “defend the Constitution” against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Now what?

Article VI of the Constitution requires Officials to take an oath “to support this Constitution.” Today, 5 U.S.C. 3331 specifies the language of the oath for federal officials. According to this statute, officials must “solemnly swear (or affirm)” that they “will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and that they “will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

The oath required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 actually dates back to 1868, when it was required of former Confederate soldiers. Here’s the text of the 1868 law:

Congress amended the 1868 statute in 1884 so that it applied to all federal officers, not just ones who had taken part in the late rebellion. And the language has stuck around, presently codified at 5 U.S.C. 3331.

So if you’re a federal employee, and you wonder just what your oath actually means, I don’t think it obligates you to oppose constitutional amendments or to take down questionable Christmas displays that you come across. Instead, I think the oath is probably best understood in its historical context as a promise to oppose political reforms outside the Constitution. You have to stay loyal to the government that is based on the Constitution, and you can’t support a rebellion or overthrow of that government. Or at least that’s what I think the historical context suggests, which I tend to think sheds some light on what the oath means.


Poster Comment:

Portions of this article were redacted in order to comply with the 'fair use doctrine'. -- And to satisfy the overly officious ninnies who came over from LP..

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

overly officious ninnies who came over from LP

Like you.

yukon  posted on  2015-01-15   20:26:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tpaine (#0)

" overly officious ninnies who came over from LP.. "

LOL !

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-16   10:23:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: tpaine (#0)

Well according to the Republican/Democratic party's they are defending the constitution and those who claim otherwise are dangerous nuts who need to be watched, spied upon and put on a list.

It's easy to claim that everything you are doing is constitutional when you stack the courts with partisan yes men who put the good of the two party's (i.e. the government) above the good of the people. We're seeing the fruits of that today as very little is unconstitutional anymore. I expect this trend to continue.

If history is any indication it's only a matter of time until those lists they are keeping will be used to the detriment of those on it. What that means is anyone's guess. Being fired for not having the right attitude? Being rounded up and hospitalized for having some sort of mental illness? Having to wear symbols on our clothes to indicate we are not government approved? Being quietly assassinated by various means that wouldn't cause undue attention. I could go on and on but you get the picture.

Of course no one can imagine this happening now and it sounds like kook talk. However, if one were to go back to the 70s and tell them what the government is doing today they would think it kook talk as well. In those days the actions the government has taken was strictly the realm of the USSR or Nazi Germany, not the United States.

Fibr Dog  posted on  2015-01-16   10:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com