“Transit risks for European consumers on the territory of Ukraine remain,” Miller said in an e-mailed statement. “There are no other options” except for the planned Turkish Stream link, he said.
“We have informed our European partners, and now it is up to them to put in place the necessary infrastructure starting from the Turkish-Greek border,” Miller said.
“The decision has been made,” Novak said. “We are diversifying and eliminating the risks of unreliable countries that caused problems in past years, including for European consumers.”
You can't get much action at all without posting a better excerpt. That's how it is.
I bet that Novorossiya will continue to get their gas via the old pipelines though. LOL.
Kiev will like this least of all. No more wholesale theft from the pipelines.
And what about Baby Brzezinski and Baby Biden? Why can't we have a welfare-for-the-rich program to guarantee them riches after their plans to enrich themselves off poor people in Ukraine have fallen through?
ou can't get much action at all without posting a better excerpt. That's how it is.
I won't - going forward I will only link or excerpt a little due to copyright fears. I assume people now know how click link to read works unlike the 90s....
I won't - going forward I will only link or excerpt a little due to copyright fears. I assume people now know how click link to read works unlike the 90s....
You won't get much action that way. If people wanted to do that, they'd just hit RSS feeds, park on Drudge, etc.
We shall see. I will post excerpts but I feel people go to forums to hash stuff out. In keeping with that I will post what I feel would be important to the discussion. Maybe some people out of habit don't want to click links but maybe times have changes.
Unless you are worried about your own (somewhat remote) liability, you might review this post about a 2011 thread with WaPo content and how it is already in Google's Cache for any WaPo shylock to use as a basis for a lawsuit. That thread violates the database clause and the fair use length clause for WaPo.
And quoting the key parts (under 300 words generally) is allowed for Fair Use. As I point out elsewhere, you can often hide behind the skirts of other blog/news sites by posting their quotes and articles here instead of going direct. In this way, it is very hard for litigious media companies to sue LF without suing the other site first.
