Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Hey Grandma just died. Lets vote who gets her stuff
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 10, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-01-10 10:48:10 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 12280
Comments: 34
Hey granny just died. Lets vote who gets her stuff.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Should we euthanize her cat too?
So I've been out of the loop for several weeks, when and how did the anti-Christian die?
It would be best if TooConservative gives you a summary - he's pretty good at getting things accurate from the database.
Money talks, you've got to outbid the socialist fat cat 1%'er, Godwinson. Merge the two sites into Flame Post?
Most people are anti-christian. Do you treat them all with no respect because of that?
. The vote thread at elPee has just been posted. www.libertypost.net/cgi-b....cgi?ArtNum=350051&Disp=0 I will provide this input: Shutting down elPee is a bad option regardless of what A K A Stone thinks. The way I see it, it is a living tribute to what Goldi created and her memory will live on if it does. I think she'd want the show to go on in her absence. Like she'd want her cat taken care of too. As for the two candidates - either one would be fine with me - so that might make things a bit complicated in the vote gathering. sysadmin should unban tpaine at this time for obvious reasons. Neil, don't let the place die, please. That's the easy way out.
Except I don't think they should close it down.
There's not that many Leftards in this country Biff, close but no cigar.
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
Okay, thanks for the clarification. I don't think they should either. You are a good example of having your own web site because no one else will have you.
Yeah I can say whatever I want. Christine didn't like that, neigher did Robin. Goldi didn't either. She banned me for posting an article from infowars years ago. Having said that I liked Goldi better then christine or Robin. She ran the site better.
I can't recollect exactly why she banned me. I think the final straw was when I offered to donate to her site if she reinstated buckeroo. I think I was accused of blackmail or sumpin. I yanked her chain once too many. I admit to being a wise guy. I hold no bitterness about it. I'll not beg my way back there though. I haven't seen buckeroo in ages. Is he still ticking? Remember the Talking Mouse episode? I'm glad I can smile about old times.
Buckeroo was a pain in the butt. But I actually liked him and he made some good posts that were interesting to read.
sysadmin should unban tpaine at this time for obvious reasons. I've had an extended email exchange with the sysadmin. In my opinion he wants to run LP, and he's set up the vote (and he's keeping me banned) to insure that outcome. Thanks for your support.
Yes, he should have some opportunity to campaign. 1 tpaine
I think you will win. I've heard from a trusted source that you are a good guy.
Well, he fooled me. If that is the case then I can't predict the future of elPee. New ownership by you or Destro would be the best outcome IMO. Some fuddy duddies are voting to close it down! I don't get it.
That is one of the reasons he lost my vote, childishly using his powers to silence a fellow candidate in an election. Good Luck! You got my vote tpain!
("Throw me to the wolves...and I will return leading the pack")
True. I suppose I was thinking 'unchristian' not 'anti-christian'
. Tell sysadmin to un-suspend tpaine. Please!
Done, I brought it to his attention.
("Throw me to the wolves...and I will return leading the pack")
Thanks for stating the obvious over there. No way should he be silenced at this critical juncture. Momentum to tpaine...
Some don't think he's serious about his offer. His voice could dispel those opinions.
sysadmin already stated that in its present form LP would cost next to nothing going forward. Now if the place gets a bunch of new posters and the new owner makes "improvements" then that could change.
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
I've had an extended email exchange with the sysadmin. In my opinion he wants to run LP, and he's set up the vote (and he's keeping me banned) to insure that outcome. --- He keeps claiming he doesn't want LP, but his actions belie him. Thanks, but I doubt I'll 'win', seeing that probably at least half of the votes have (already) gone to #3, or #4. If the vote count reaches a total of 25 for those two options, (considering LP has approx 100 active posters) I won't be the 'owner'.... Thanks again, murron, for your support...
As long as sysadmin refuses to allow tpain an opportunity to speak for himself, there will always be a cloud over how serious he was, or his true intentions and motives. It will aways be his word, his word we can't see or hear, against vicious rumors and nasty innuendo's. tpain can't dispel anything as long as he is locked out.
("Throw me to the wolves...and I will return leading the pack")
And you can bet the farm, if he's elected, all we're going to hear from now on is how is didn't want LP, how LP is messing with his personal life...blah...blah..blah...if he's that unhappy with what he's done so far, he really should back off and allow others here who would enjoy this site a little more.
("Throw me to the wolves...and I will return leading the pack")
I doubt I'll 'win', seeing that probably at least half of the votes have (already) gone to #3, or #4. If the vote count reaches a total of 25 for those two options, (considering LP has approx 100 active posters) I won't be the 'owner'.... Just did a quick count over at LP, approx 10 votes for sysadmin or for a shut down. My offer is out if they reach 25.. He keeps claiming he doesn't want LP, but his actions belie him. Bingo. Our anonymous would be owner should at least, -- inform everyone at LP who he posted as at both LP and at freerepublic.
Pericles, of course. FOUL !!! tpaine is unable to vote for himself. Booshbot666 posted on 2015-01-10 In your face vote fraud. tpaine is banned.
Let him vote for himself, -- he needs the support.
I think it's completely fair that you stay banned. It's his site and he thinks you deliberately put him in legal jeopardy. Why should he have to let you post? As far as he's concerned your banning is self-inflicted.
. That claim is very debatable, as some here (is N Chan a lawyer?) posted earlier. Again, that is debatable. Go to that earlier thread and argue your case. -- I never had that opportunity over at LP. Thank you for your opinions, Mr Obvious.
Obvious, I suppose, but talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Lol
. Here is a link. Last I knew Goldie had no next of kin. sysadmin couldn't get much info-he isn't next of kin. Don't know any immediate family. Don't know what she died of. sysadmin called the officers and they found her after doing a wellness trip. sysadmin works on Goldie's site.
Whatever, mad dog....
#2. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
#3. To: 4 givan 1, TooConservative (#2)
#4. To: A K A Stone, Godwinson, Destro (#0)
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#5. To: 4 givan 1 (#2)
Nobody calls me Mad Dog.
#6. To: hondo68, Pinguinite (#4)
#7. To: Fred Mertz (#6)
I will provide this input: Shutting down elPee is a bad option regardless of what A K A Stone thinks.
#8. To: Biff Tannen (#5)
Most people are anti-christian.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#10. To: Fred Mertz (#9)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#10)
(Edited)
Goldi didn't either. She banned me for posting an article from infowars years ago.
#12. To: Fred Mertz, buckeroo (#11)
#13. To: Fred Mertz, Y'ALL (#6)
As for the two candidates - either one would be fine with me - so that might make things a bit complicated in the vote gathering.
#14. To: Fred Mertz (#6)
sysadmin should unban tpaine at this time for obvious reasons.
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#15. To: tpaine (#13)
#16. To: tpaine (#13)
In my opinion he wants to run LP, and he's set up the vote (and he's keeping me banned) to insure that outcome.
#17. To: tpaine (#13)
I've had an extended email exchange with the sysadmin. In my opinion he wants to run LP, and he's set up the vote (and he's keeping me banned) to insure that outcome.
#18. To: CZ82 (#8)
Nobody calls me Mad Dog.
#19. To: Murron (#17)
#20. To: Fred Mertz (#19)
Tell sysadmin to un-suspend tpaine. Please!
#21. To: Murron, hondo68 (#17)
#22. To: Murron (#20)
#23. To: Fred Mertz (#22)
Some don't think he's serious about his offer. His voice could dispel those opinions.
#24. To: Murron, Y'ALL (#17)
(Edited)
That is one of the reasons he lost my vote, childishly using his powers to silence a fellow candidate in an election. --- Good Luck! You got my vote tpain!
#25. To: Fred Mertz, tpain, ALL (#22)
Some don't think he's serious about his offer. His voice could dispel those opinions.
#26. To: tpaine, Y'ALL (#24)
He keeps claiming he doesn't want LP, but his actions belie him.
#27. To: Murron, Y'ALL, sysadmin (#26)
And you can bet the farm, if he's elected, all we're going to hear from now on is how is didn't want LP, how LP is messing with his personal life...blah...blah..blah...if he's that unhappy with what he's done so far, he really should back off and allow others here who would enjoy this site a little more.
#28. To: tpaine, Murron (#27)
#30. To: Pericles, sysadmin (#29)
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#29. To: hondo68 (#28)
In your face vote fraud. tpaine is banned.
#30. To: tpaine (#29)
Nobody calls me Mad Dog.
#31. To: Biff Tannen, nolo chan, Y'ALL (#30)
think it's completely fair that you stay banned. It's his site ---
-- and he thinks you deliberately put him in legal jeopardy.
Why should he have to let you post? As far as he's concerned your banning is self-inflicted.
#32. To: tpaine (#31)
Nobody calls me Mad Dog.
#33. To: 4 givan 1 (#2)
#34. To: Biff Tannen (#32)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]