U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Here’s Obama’s Immigration Speech In Full--transcript
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://time.com/3598756/obama-immigration-action/
Published: Nov 20, 2014
Author: Zeke J Miller
Post Date: 2014-11-20 20:49:16 by out damned spot
Keywords: Obama, executive amnesty, speech
Views: 1827
Comments: 9
President Barack Obama announced new executive actions on immigration Thursday evening in a primetime address to the nation. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery: My fellow Americans, tonight, I’d like to talk with you about immigration. For more than 200 years, our tradition of welcoming immigrants from around the world has given us a tremendous advantage over other nations. It’s kept us youthful, dynamic, and entrepreneurial. It has shaped our character as a people with limitless possibilities – people not trapped by our past, but able to remake ourselves as we choose. But today, our immigration system is broken, and everybody knows it. Families who enter our country the right way and play by the rules watch others flout the rules. Business owners who offer their workers good wages and benefits see the competition exploit undocumented immigrants by paying them far less. All of us take offense to anyone who reaps the rewards of living in America without taking on the responsibilities of living in America. And undocumented immigrants who desperately want to embrace those responsibilities see little option but to remain in the shadows, or risk their families being torn apart. It’s been this way for decades. And for decades, we haven’t done much about it. When I took office, I committed to fixing this broken immigration system. And I began by doing what I could to secure our borders. Today, we have more agents and technology deployed to secure our southern border than at any time in our history. And over the past six years, illegal border crossings have been cut by more than half. Although this summer, there was a brief spike in unaccompanied children being apprehended at our border, the number of such children is now actually lower than it’s been in nearly two years. Overall, the number of people trying to cross our border illegally is at its lowest level since the 1970s. Those are the facts. Meanwhile, I worked with Congress on a comprehensive fix, and last year, 68 Democrats, Republicans, and Independents came together to pass a bipartisan bill in the Senate. It wasn’t perfect. It was a compromise, but it reflected common sense. It would have doubled the number of border patrol agents, while giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship if they paid a fine, started paying their taxes, and went to the back of the line. And independent experts said that it would help grow our economy and shrink our deficits. Had the House of Representatives allowed that kind of a bill a simple yes-or-no vote, it would have passed with support from both parties, and today it would be the law. But for a year and a half now, Republican leaders in the House have refused to allow that simple vote. Now, I continue to believe that the best way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as President – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican Presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just. Tonight, I am announcing those actions. First, we’ll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings, and speed the return of those who do cross over. Second, I will make it easier and faster for high-skilled immigrants, graduates, and entrepreneurs to stay and contribute to our economy, as so many business leaders have proposed. Third, we’ll take steps to deal responsibly with the millions of undocumented immigrants who already live in our country. I want to say more about this third issue, because it generates the most passion and controversy. Even as we are a nation of immigrants, we are also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable – especially those who may be dangerous. That’s why, over the past six years, deportations of criminals are up 80 percent. And that’s why we’re going to keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our security. Felons, not families. Criminals, not children. Gang members, not a mother who’s working hard to provide for her kids. We’ll prioritize, just like law enforcement does every day. But even as we focus on deporting criminals, the fact is, millions of immigrants – in every state, of every race and nationality – will still live here illegally. And let’s be honest – tracking down, rounding up, and deporting millions of people isn’t realistic. Anyone who suggests otherwise isn’t being straight with you. It’s also not who we are as Americans. After all, most of these immigrants have been here a long time. They work hard, often in tough, low-paying jobs. They support their families. They worship at our churches. Many of their kids are American-born or spent most of their lives here, and their hopes, dreams, and patriotism are just like ours. As my predecessor, President Bush, once put it: “They are a part of American life.” Now here’s the thing: we expect people who live in this country to play by the rules. We expect that those who cut the line will not be unfairly rewarded. So we’re going to offer the following deal: If you’ve been in America for more than five years; if you have children who are American citizens or legal residents; if you register, pass a criminal background check, and you’re willing to pay your fair share of taxes – you’ll be able to apply to stay in this country temporarily, without fear of deportation. You can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. That’s what this deal is. Now let’s be clear about what it isn’t. This deal does not apply to anyone who has come to this country recently. It does not apply to anyone who might come to America illegally in the future. It does not grant citizenship, or the right to stay here permanently, or offer the same benefits that citizens receive – only Congress can do that. All we’re saying is we’re not going to deport you. I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time. That’s the real amnesty – leaving this broken system the way it is. Mass amnesty would be unfair. Mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our character. What I’m describing is accountability – a commonsense, middle ground approach: If you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up. The actions I’m taking are not only lawful, they’re the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican President and every single Democratic President for the past half century. And to those Members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill. I want to work with both parties to pass a more permanent legislative solution. And the day I sign that bill into law, the actions I take will no longer be necessary. Meanwhile, don’t let a disagreement over a single issue be a dealbreaker on every issue. That’s not how our democracy works, and Congress certainly shouldn’t shut down our government again just because we disagree on this. Americans are tired of gridlock. What our country needs from us right now is a common purpose – a higher purpose. Most Americans support the types of reforms I’ve talked about tonight. But I understand the disagreements held by many of you at home. Millions of us, myself included, go back generations in this country, with ancestors who put in the painstaking work to become citizens. So we don’t like the notion that anyone might get a free pass to American citizenship. I know that some worry immigration will change the very fabric of who we are, or take our jobs, or stick it to middle-class families at a time when they already feel like they’ve gotten the raw end of the deal for over a decade. I hear these concerns. But that’s not what these steps would do. Our history and the facts show that immigrants are a net plus for our economy and our society. And I believe it’s important that all of us have this debate without impugning each other’s character. Because for all the back-and-forth of Washington, we have to remember that this debate is about something bigger. It’s about who we are as a country, and who we want to be for future generations. Are we a nation that tolerates the hypocrisy of a system where workers who pick our fruit and make our beds never have a chance to get right with the law? Or are we a nation that gives them a chance to make amends, take responsibility, and give their kids a better future? Are we a nation that accepts the cruelty of ripping children from their parents’ arms? Or are we a nation that values families, and works to keep them together? Are we a nation that educates the world’s best and brightest in our universities, only to send them home to create businesses in countries that compete against us? Or are we a nation that encourages them to stay and create jobs, businesses, and industries right here in America? That’s what this debate is all about. We need more than politics as usual when it comes to immigration; we need reasoned, thoughtful, compassionate debate that focuses on our hopes, not our fears. I know the politics of this issue are tough. But let me tell you why I have come to feel so strongly about it. Over the past few years, I have seen the determination of immigrant fathers who worked two or three jobs, without taking a dime from the government, and at risk at any moment of losing it all, just to build a better life for their kids. I’ve seen the heartbreak and anxiety of children whose mothers might be taken away from them just because they didn’t have the right papers. I’ve seen the courage of students who, except for the circumstances of their birth, are as American as Malia or Sasha; students who bravely come out as undocumented in hopes they could make a difference in a country they love. These people – our neighbors, our classmates, our friends – they did not come here in search of a free ride or an easy life. They came to work, and study, and serve in our military, and above all, contribute to America’s success. Tomorrow, I’ll travel to Las Vegas and meet with some of these students, including a young woman named Astrid Silva. Astrid was brought to America when she was four years old. Her only possessions were a cross, her doll, and the frilly dress she had on. When she started school, she didn’t speak any English. She caught up to the other kids by reading newspapers and watching PBS, and became a good student. Her father worked in landscaping. Her mother cleaned other people’s homes. They wouldn’t let Astrid apply to a technology magnet school for fear the paperwork would out her as an undocumented immigrant – so she applied behind their back and got in. Still, she mostly lived in the shadows – until her grandmother, who visited every year from Mexico, passed away, and she couldn’t travel to the funeral without risk of being found out and deported. It was around that time she decided to begin advocating for herself and others like her, and today, Astrid Silva is a college student working on her third degree. Are we a nation that kicks out a striving, hopeful immigrant like Astrid – or are we a nation that finds a way to welcome her in? Scripture tells us that we shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger – we were strangers once, too. My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of immigrants. We were strangers once, too. And whether our forebears were strangers who crossed the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we are here only because this country welcomed them in, and taught them that to be an American is about something more than what we look like, or what our last names are, or how we worship. What makes us Americans is our shared commitment to an ideal – that all of us are created equal, and all of us have the chance to make of our lives what we will. That’s the country our parents and grandparents and generations before them built for us. That’s the tradition we must uphold. That’s the legacy we must leave for those who are yet to come. Thank you, God bless you, and God bless this country we love.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: out damned spot (#0)
Here's the BIGGEST lie in a treasonous, nation-cratering speech festooned with a gazillion lies: "Thank you, God bless you, and God bless this country we love."
100% horse-crap from the illegally elected lying Indonesian-Kenyan racist... Most Americans clearly oppose turning America into a Mexican hell-hole, having our cities and towns overrun with Mayan and Inca Indians, La Raza militants, Cartel Gang-Bangers, AND Lord knows how many Muslims. The vast majority of American strongly oppose subsidizing these 40 million Freeloading parasitic enemies of the USA as REAL Americans struggle with bills, crime, and an insane, rogue goobermint.
What did he do to fix the broken immigration system for his first six years in office? For the first two years when the Dems had the House, Senate and the White House. What did he do to secure the borders since he took office. If he secured our borders, explain the flood of children streaming across that same border in 2014. Had the House of Representatives allowed that kind of a bill a simple yes-or-no vote, it would have passed with support from both parties, and today it would be the law. But for a year and a half now, Republican leaders in the House have refused to allow that simple vote. It was blue slipped -- rejected as an unconstitutional revenue raising bill initiated in the Senate. All such bills are required the the Constitution to be initiated only in the House of Representatives -- not in the Senate and definitely not in the Oval Office. A better question is why was it attempted to initiate a revenue raising bill in the Senate instead of the House? The Senate leadership was well aware that what they were doing was unconstitutional. No previous president has taken the same kind of actions as Obama without having prior legislative authority to take action. What part of this requires an executive order, or what explains the failure to do so when it has long been mandated by law? What did drawing the border patrol back fifty miles from the border accomplish? Uh, yeah about that Oval Office making or changing Federal policy regarding immigration -- Article 1. Anyone who suggests the Obama administration has not been straight with the American people.... just remember all the way back to Grubergate. A prior deal was legislated into federal law -- on the promise that the border would be secured and it would not happen again. Carrying out that federal law, a former president issued executive orders. Doing this required a federal law in 1986. President Obama was unable to obtain a federal law to do it all over again. Congressional refusal to enact legislation does not act as a delegation of power to the President to do it himself. Sounds good. Make them play by the rules and do not reward those that try to cut in line. No rewards. That's what they said in 1986. The provisions of that bill do not apply to illegal alien border jumpers in 2014. See Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition: That's real bullcrap and this is real mass amnesty. Bullcrap. Prior such executive orders were implementing a piece of legislation passed by the congress. They were not presidential decrees creating the revenue raising law. Congress most certainly has passed a bill. It can be found in the United States Codes. Just because the president does not like the law is no justification or delegation of authority to rewrite it. Nonsense. Only idiots would trust President Obama to seal the border. Very few support amnesty without first sealing the border. President Obama has had six years to seal the border and has made no effective effort to do it. Whie the federal government has failed to protect the borders, they have jumped to legal action to thwart state efforts to do the job that have failed to do. Some worry that the taking of American jobs is filed under mission accomplished. They can get right with the law by swimming accross the river in the other direction and joining the end of the line. Those waiting at the front of the line can then take their place. Keep them together. Those that are illegal can all be given a one way ticket. Dude. If she left, her worry would not be getting deported from Mexico. It would be once again gaining illegal entry to the United States. How do you welcome illegal alien border jumpers into the country? Oh, wait, when they walk up to the Immigration official, they are welcomed to stay, with benefits. That's progress.
Great observations and post. No previous president has taken the same kind of actions as 0buma without having prior legislative authority to take action. And still, the GOP eunuchs and constitutional "experts" are mum and stuck in idle.
Amnesty. A sovereign act of forgiveness for past acts, granted by a governent to all persons (or to certain classes of persons) who hve been guilty of crime or delict, generally political offenses,—treason, sedition, rebellion, draft evasion,—and often conditioned upon their return to obedience and duty within a prescribed time. You are thorough. Great analysis.
:)
Excellent!
So, that's the President's position. That's what he's ordering. And that's what will be done. There are two ways to stop it: ONE: The Republican-controlled Supreme Court can intervene with an injunction. That will only work if Obama obeys it. If he ignores the Court, there would have to be Senate Democrats willing to remove him, or he gets his way. TWO: One house of Congress can refuse to fund anything until its withdrawn. This will mean eventual default on the national debt, because Obama is not going to back down. Obama plays the hardest of hardball.
Thank you.
#2. To: out damned spot (#0)
(Edited)
Most Americans support the types of reforms I’ve talked about tonight.
#3. To: out damned spot (#0)
When I took office, I committed to fixing this broken immigration system. And I began by doing what I could to secure our borders.
Meanwhile, I worked with Congress on a comprehensive fix, and last year, 68 Democrats, Republicans, and Independents came together to pass a bipartisan bill in the Senate. It wasn’t perfect. It was a compromise, but it reflected common sense. It would have doubled the number of border patrol agents, while giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship if they paid a fine, started paying their taxes, and went to the back of the line. And independent experts said that it would help grow our economy and shrink our deficits.
Now, I continue to believe that the best way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as President – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican Presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just.
First, we’ll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings, and speed the return of those who do cross over.
Third, we’ll take steps to deal responsibly with the millions of undocumented immigrants who already live in our country.
And let’s be honest – tracking down, rounding up, and deporting millions of people isn’t realistic. Anyone who suggests otherwise isn’t being straight with you.
We expect that those who cut the line will not be unfairly rewarded. So we’re going to offer the following deal: If you’ve been in America for more than five years; if you have children who are American citizens or legal residents; if you register, pass a criminal background check, and you’re willing to pay your fair share of taxes – you’ll be able to apply to stay in this country temporarily, without fear of deportation.
Now here’s the thing: we expect people who live in this country to play by the rules. We expect that those who cut the line will not be unfairly rewarded.
This deal does not apply to anyone who has come to this country recently. It does not apply to anyone who might come to America illegally in the future.
I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not.
Amnesty. A sovereign act of forgiveness for past acts, granted by a governent to all persons (or to certain classes of persons) who hve been guilty of crime or delict, generally political offenses,—treason, sedition, rebellion, draft evasion,—and often conditioned upon their return to obedience and duty within a prescribed time. The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for many undocumented aliens already present in the country.
That’s the real amnesty – leaving this broken system the way it is. Mass amnesty would be unfair.
The actions I’m taking are not only lawful, they’re the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican President and every single Democratic President for the past half century.
And to those Members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill.
Most Americans support the types of reforms I’ve talked about tonight.
I know that some worry immigration will change the very fabric of who we are, or take our jobs
Are we a nation that tolerates the hypocrisy of a system where workers who pick our fruit and make our beds never have a chance to get right with the law?
Are we a nation that accepts the cruelty of ripping children from their parents’ arms? Or are we a nation that values families, and works to keep them together?
Still, she mostly lived in the shadows – until her grandmother, who visited every year from Mexico, passed away, and she couldn’t travel to the funeral without risk of being found out and deported.
Are we a nation that kicks out a striving, hopeful immigrant like Astrid – or are we a nation that finds a way to welcome her in?
#4. To: nolu chan (#3)
#5. To: nolu chan (#3)
I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. See Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition:
#6. To: nolu chan (#3)
They can get right with the law by swimming accross the river in the other direction and joining the end of the line.
#7. To: nolu chan (#3)
#8. To: out damned spot (#0)
#9. To: out damned spot, Liberator, A K A Stone (#7)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]