United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: A Time For Choosing, What?
Source:
Library of Law & Liberty
URL Source: http://www.libertylawsite.org/2014/11/03/a-time-for-choosing-what/
Published: Nov 4, 2014
Author: Angelo Codevilla
Post Date: 2014-11-04 08:57:36 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 1870
Comments: 10
As the American people go to the polls in an election which, both parties tell us, will decide the country’s future by determining which of them will have a majority in the Senate, Ronald Reagan’s October 27, 1964 speech “A Time For Choosing,” the golden anniversary of which came last week, leads us to ask what choices the Republicans and Democrats are giving us in 2014, and what difference the success of either makes. Reagan, speaking on behalf of Barry Goldwater said: This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. That was an accurate description of that election, but only because Goldwater had won the Republican presidential nomination promising “a choice, not an echo” – and meant it. Goldwater and Reagan were rebels against the Republican Party. Their call for a return to self government threatened the government power on which the social position and wealth of both parties’ establishments depends. Accordingly the Republican establishment, followed by the Democrats, called them extremists, Fascists, racists, etc. Fifty years later, more than ever, the Democratic Party and its Republican establishment followers are all about enlarging their grip on the material and moral substance of American life and besmirching anyone who challenges their authority to do so. The contrast between America’s ruling class and the rest of us is sharper than ever. The partisan rhetoric of American elections has changed little in a half century. But, since the passing of Goldwater and Reagan, no personage of national stature has arisen who has transcended the Republican establishment. Hence, while America’s situation in 2014 resembles that of 1964, the electoral choices do not. In 2014, neither party offers the American people the opportunity to re- establish self-government. Rather, Democrats energize their constituencies by insulting outsiders, and Republicans dishearten theirs by courting the insiders. In a nutshell, the Democratic Party wins elections by getting ever-greater percentages of the vote from ever-narrower constituencies – the ruling class and its dependents – and does so by stoking their sense of superiority and/or grievance against the rest the country in general. The Republican Party has been losing elections by getting ever-smaller percentages of the vote from the country in general, which it tries to court without offending the Democrats’ constituencies. Politics in 2014 is not about any issue as Goldwater and Reagan defined the term. It has degenerated into a kind of war over whose identity will prevail over whose. Democratic pollster Cornell Belcher’s reminder of the Democrats’ dependence on the black vote merely reprised the U.S. Census Bureau’s report on the 2012 election. To wit: Democrats lost the white vote 60/40, but got 91 % of the black vote. The turnout among blacks, 12% of the population, had risen by 6% over the previous eight years while the turnout by whites, over 70% of the population, had dropped by over 3%. This one disparity in turnout and yield gave Democrats an electoral edge of about 1% of the national vote. Food stamps and other forms of welfare motivate this constituency less than appeals to its sense of resentment, entitlement, and revenge. No surprise then that, as the New York Times reported last week, “Democrats in the closest Senate races across the South are turning to racially charged messages…to jolt African-Americans into voting … The images and words they are using are striking for how overtly they play on fears of intimidation and repression.” The Democratic Party approaches its other constituencies similarly. America’s richest and most influential communities – e.g. Montgomery County, MD; Boston’s Weston-Wayland suburbs; Palo Alto, CA; plus university towns, nearly all white – vote Democratic in percentages comparable to those of black precincts. This other minority at the opposite end of the socio economic scale provides campaign cash and intellectual-moral top cover to Democrats less in exchange for the contracts, grants and consultancies that it receives from government than because the Party’s championing of abortion, gay rights, and condemnation of lesser Americans’ habits, stokes its sense of superior intelligence and advanced morality as well as its sense of entitlement to rule. What seems superficially to be the Democrats’ appeal to a natural majority — females — is similarly divisive. In 2012, 55% of females voted Democrat (to 45% of men). But Democrats got only 43% of married women (and widows). Their favorable female “gender gap” is due almost entirely to the fact that the 17% of the adult female population who are unmarried or divorced voted Democrat by a ratio of roughly 70/30. The Democrats secure this minority’s support less by any benefits they provide for it than by flogging the specter of a “war on women.” By contrast, whom or what the Republican Party does not represent is clearer than what it does represent. There is no doubt that the Democratic Party is mobilizing its supporters on the basis of a kind of war on their fellow Americans. It is just as clear that the Republican Party is neither marshaling constituencies to answer in kind nor even defending any of the persons, groups, and ways of life who are the targets of the Democratic constituencies’ animus. Much less does the Republican Party offer the choice that Goldwater and Reagan wanted the American people to have. America has been going in its current direction for a generation, under Republican presidents and congresses as well as under Democrats. Our problems are bipartisan. A half century after Ronald Reagan spoke, ours is still very much “a time for choosing.” More than ever, we lack a political instrument for doing so.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Yep.
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)
The REASON for this is that the Republican Party, at its command and control center, is a party that is financed by the super-wealthy corporate elite and exists above all to serve THEIR interests. THEY own the party, and always have, since the corrupt Administration of U.S. Grant after the Civil War. They build coalitions where they can, and propagandize to gain votes and drive movements as they must, in order to maintain the quantum of power necessary to put into place favorable tax and regulatory regimes for the super-rich (which is not all the same thing as what is desirable for the entrepreneurs or wannabee rich), and to prevent the imposition of unfavorable laws. So, when the Core Party of Wealth needs to stop the Left from enacting tax and regulation regimes that will impact the super-rich, they will organize "Crusades for Christ" - to get the Born Again and pro-life vote, or they'll organize national security focus, to get the military and nationalist vote. They need the VOTES so they can maintain the bulwark of politicians they need to protect their economic interests. But once they get the politicians in place, they always go limp on the social issues, or go strange on the national security issues. They never do the right thing and they never follow through, because they never, ever intended to. The Republican Party political machine is there to tell the Big Lie and dupe the rubes into maintaining the Republican politician base to prevent the rich from being hit with the same taxes and regulations as everybody else. THAT is what the Republican Party IS, THAT is their core constituency. Most of the super- rich are pro-abortion and pro-defense SPENDING, and pro-gay marriage, so they're never going to press ahead on the actual causes for which they organize the rubes to vote Republican. Instead, they will perpetually campaign on "We need a little more", "We have to stop the Democrats". The duped rubes vote Republican, the rich impoverish them, and they blame the Democrats for it. Lather, rinse, repeat. It's been a highly effective strategy, and it will continue to be so. Tonight, the Republicans are going to trounce the Democrats, and rubes like the conservatives here will be happy. In fact, the people who will have one are the ones who would slit their children's throats if it would keep taxes on the Alphas low, and who will be working determinedly to ship the Republican rank- and-file's jobs overseas. But Republican voters are as stupid as ghetto blacks. They keep right on voting for the people who screw them and rob them blind, and they just buy the propaganda and hate the other side because they're told to. A pox on both houses. Democrats and Republicans both suck.
It's a suicide cult.
And you wonder why you never get invited to all the fun parties:)
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
Good to see you voted today. LOL!!!
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)
That's pretty much the way I feel about it. The concentration of unearned wealth seems dangerous to a republic. In his writings on America de Tocqueville noted how the conscience decision had been reached, independently in all parts of the nation to eliminate primogeniture, which would have over time the effect of concentrating wealth with each succeeding generation, while the converse tended towards the opposite (which was exactly as they intended it). This was in the time when the great majority of economic output was that which was raised from the soil. America was settled by a lot of second and third sons who would have been frozen out of inheriting back in England, and would formerly have the army or the clergy as a career option. The decision that de Tocqueville wrote about was made by the generation that won independence from Britain. They seemed to have known from bitter experience the dangers of a parasitic aristocracy that lived off rents of lands handed them by decree. In Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution they included: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States... A lot of what the GOP and Democrats do is to grant virtual estates, legislation for the privileged few that grants them artificial rents for values of things created by government fiat. And this parasitic aristocracy funds the election campaigns for their high priced whores in DC.
It was overrated back in the home country too. Coldplay gets it right: "Revolutionaries wait for my head on a silver plate, just a puppet on a lonely string. Aw, who would ever wanna be King? I hear Jerusalem bells are ringing, Roman cavalry choirs are singing..."
Did you throw up before or afterwards?
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
The Democratic Party approaches its other constituencies similarly. America’s richest and most influential communities – e.g. Montgomery County, MD; Boston’s Weston-Wayland suburbs; Palo Alto, CA; plus university towns, nearly all white – vote Democratic in percentages comparable to those of black precincts. This other minority at the opposite end of the socio economic scale provides campaign cash and intellectual-moral top cover to Democrats less in exchange for the contracts, grants and consultancies that it receives from government than because the Party’s championing of abortion, gay rights, and condemnation of lesser Americans’ habits, stokes its sense of superior intelligence and advanced morality as well as its sense of entitlement to rule.
#2. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
By contrast, whom or what the Republican Party does not represent is clearer than what it does represent. There is no doubt that the Democratic Party is mobilizing its supporters on the basis of a kind of war on their fellow Americans. It is just as clear that the Republican Party is neither marshaling constituencies to answer in kind nor even defending any of the persons, groups, and ways of life who are the targets of the Democratic constituencies’ animus.
#3. To: Vicomte13, D 'n R suicide cult, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#2)
A pox on both houses. Democrats and Republicans both suck.
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#4. To: Vicomte13 (#2)
A pox on both houses. Democrats and Republicans both suck
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#2)
A pox on both houses. Democrats and Republicans both suck.
#6. To: redleghunter (#4)
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#7. To: hondo68 (#6)
#8. To: Vicomte13 (#2)
A pox on both houses. Democrats and Republicans both suck.
#9. To: nativist nationalist (#8)
(Edited)
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States...
#10. To: hondo68 (#6)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]