United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Minnesota Woman Announces Her Home Is Open For Uncontested Burglary
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://bearingarms.com/minnesota-wo ... ome-open-uncontested-burglary/
Published: Oct 26, 2014
Author: Bob Owens
Post Date: 2014-10-26 15:37:46 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 2379
Comments: 9
Kimberly Edson, passive-aggressive collectivist and future Rochester, MN crime victim. At a very fundamental level, individualists and collectivists see the world in a very different way. Individuals look at a problem or issue and think, “what can I do about it?” Collectivists look at a problem and think, “what can I do to get someone else to do about this?” That foundational difference in outlooks is very much at the heart of the debate over firearms in this nation, as individualists demand to retain their right to own and use the firearms of their choice as they see fit for self-defense, community defense, sport, amusement, and hunting. Collectivists run away from that individual right of self-defense and the sober responsibility that owning a firearm requires, and instead insist that the state—and the state alone—should have that power and responsibility. If only the state has that responsibility, they don’t feel like lesser people for shirking that responsibility. That larger issue is being played out on a smaller scale in Rochester, Minnesota, as an individualist father practicing his Second Amendment right to carry a firearm to defend himself and those he loves has run headlong into a terrified collectivist who hates the responsibility of self-defense, and has decided to use her First Amendment rights to passive-aggressively attack him. Matthew Halleck brings his two girls to and from the outskirts of Harriet Bishop Elementary in Rochester every day. “I’m going to protect my children anyway I can,” said Halleck. For Matthew, that means carrying a concealed gun that he has a permit for, while adhering to all legal boundaries. “It’s not crossing the street here, where the crosswalk is, it’s making sure it’s concealed so the kids can’t see it,” he said. But Matthew is no longer the only one who knows he’s carrying a gun. Recently a sign went up in a front yard across the street from the school. It has Matthew’s picture on it and reads, “This man carries a loaded gun around your children every day.” “Since we don’t have a way to stop him, we felt it was important to notify the neighborhood and the parents that there is an armed man in their presence,” said Kimberly Edson, a Rochester resident who put the sign up. “The first couple days of school he had it very visible, we saw it and were quite concerned,” she said. Kimberly called the police the day the picture was taken, but they said Matthew has a legal right to carry off school property. Matthew also contacted authorities concerning the sign, and while they briefly took the sign down, it was eventually determined that Kimberly was also breaking no laws. “He has a 2nd Amendment right to carry the gun, I have my 1st Amendment right to say that I don’t like it,” said Edson. Kimberly Edson’s sign attempting to shame Matthew Halleck for keeping children safe. Mr. Halleck,a former PTA President and school board President, is very active in the community. He takes proactive, individualist steps to make it a better place through his actions, whether that means volunteering his time at the school, or in providing for his own family’s security. Kimberly Edson’s “community involvement” seems limited to attempting to passive-aggressive attacks against constitutional and human rights that she doesn’t like, and attempts at bullying people like Mr. Halleck who take their responsibilities to defend their families and communities seriously in a dangerous world. Curiously, Ms. Edson doesn’t seem to grasp that her passive-aggressive attacks on Mr. Halleck via her yard sign has effectively announced to every criminal in Rochester Minnesota that her home across from Harriet Bishop Elementary is undefended. We sincerely hope that Ms. Edson and her family members are not hurt when criminals recognize her gun-free home as the target of opportunity that it is, and wonder if she will change her mind about the human right of self-defense once it is her life that has been affected by crime.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Or future Mrs. Sneakpete.
Ok why is she future MRS sneakypeter?
She wants to force people into conforming with her value system, it is not enough for her to be unarmed. She wants to force disarmament upon everyone else. Sneakypete is like that too, he wants everyone to accept his pro sodomy agenda, but he does not want to allow others the same freedom to choose. If you don't want to bake a cake for a fag wedding, he wants the state to force you to bake them a cake.
I'm still waiting for the KKK to demand a black baker bake them a cake to celebrate past lynchings.
KKK wins lawsuit against bakery for discrimination Politics August 23, 2013 Comments: 64 KKK A Georgia court has ruled in favor of the KKK in a discrimination lawsuit. A Georgia court has ruled in favor of Marshall Saxby, the Grand Wizard of a local KKK chapter, in a lawsuit stemming from two years ago when a local bakery denied him service. The three judge panel concluded unanimously that the bakery had violated civil rights laws by discriminating against Saxby when they refused to sell him a cake for his organization’s annual birthday party. Elaine Bailey, who owns Bailey Bakeries, refused to bake a cake for the ceremony because it violated her religious beliefs. Saxby filed the lawsuit claiming that Bailey’s refusal of service was discriminatory against his religious beliefs. The case is similar to the recent decision in New Mexico where a court has ruled that a photographer discriminated against a gay couple for refusing to provide them service. Bailey said in a prepared statement, “it’s a sad day when bigots have to be treated equally before the law. If they can discriminate against people, then surely I cannot be forced to support their beliefs by providing them services against my will.” Saxby was very happy with the outcome, stating “the law says that it’s wrong to discriminate against people if you run a business, and that means she was wrong in discriminating against our organization by refusing us service.” People on both sides of the issue have had varying remarks. One man stated “I am against anti-discrimination laws. Freedom means people are able to do what they wish with their lives and property. Society can punish bad behaviors in a market, but the power to take away from someones life as if it did not belong to them is frightening. Another person familiar with the case responded “This is not the same as denying service to someone based on the color of their skin or sexual preference. This was a choice by the owner of the bakery to not serve someone based on their bigoted lifestyle, and there’s nothing wrong with that.” Many wonder that if she had simply lied about her reasoning, would this have even been an issue. That leaves the question to the public, do they want discrimination to happen out in the open where people can pinpoint it, or do they want it to operate a cloaked manner where it happens but it’s hard to tell who is doing it? By: George R.M. Spooner Contact George via email at TribuneHeraldNews@gmail.com
I think that is satire.
You didn't specify whether or not it had to be true. :) I've heard this guy has an account on Facebook is that where you seen him before? He posts some funny/way out stuff.
No at first I thought you edited an article as a joke. So I pasted the first few words into google. Then found out.
There are no replies to Comment # 9. End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestKimberly Edson, passive-aggressive collectivist and future Rochester, MN crime victim.
#2. To: nativist nationalist (#1)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
Ok why is she future MRS sneakypeter?
#4. To: nativist nationalist (#3)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#4)
#7. To: CZ82 (#6)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#9. To: CZ82 (#8)
I've heard this guy has an account on Facebook is that where you seen him before? He posts some funny/way out stuff.
Replies to Comment # 9.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]