International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Terrorist Exchanged For Bowe Bergdahl Now Top ISIS Commander
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://nationalreport.net/terrorist ... rgdahl-now-top-isis-commander/
Published: Sep 18, 2014
Author: National Report
Post Date: 2014-09-18 07:20:50 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 7986
Comments: 26
Mullah Mohammed Fazi, one of the five Guantanamo Bay detainees released by the Obama administration in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, has been confirmed to be currently in Iraq. Fazi, the Taliban’s former Defense Minister, is serving in a leadership capacity within the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS. Reports indicate that Fazi, classified by a 2008 Pentagon dossier as being considered a high risk to the United States if released, appears to be heavily engaged in the systematic murder of Iraqs non-Sunni population. Internal Pentagon assessments say the strategy of wholesale slaughter carried out in ISIS occupied territories very well could have originated with Fazi. Many of the same techniques were utilized by the Taliban in Afghanistan to consolidate and strengthen their position under Mohammed Fazi’s direction. News of Fazi’s involvement in the ISIS caliphate comes shortly on the heels of a finding by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office that President Obama broke the law when he exchanged five Taliban leaders for Sgt Bowe Bergdahl. The White House has “strongly disagreed” with the GAO’s conclusions. White House spokesman Eric Schultz has said that,”We reject the implication that the administration acted unlawfully.” The Obama administration is worried that news of Fazi’s emergence as a top commander in ISIS will worsen public perception of both the terrorist swap for Bergdahl and the GAO’s findings of illegal activity. The two events, taken together, could generate sufficient fallout to derail some of the political agenda President Obama has for the remainder of his “lame duck” term. The White House has gone into full damage control mode regarding both developments. Unofficial word coming out of the White House is that Fazi has been elevated to the top of a prioritized drone strike list of terrorist targets. It is being speculated that the administration believes that it can mitigate a large portion of the potential political fallout if Fazi, and the embarrassment he represents, is quickly eliminated. To facilitate this elimination large portions of regional drone resources are being specifically tasked with finding and destroying the former prisoner. Senator John McCain has stated that he believes the GAO’S findings, coupled with Fazi re-engaging in terrorist and genocidal activities, could be grounds for impeachment. “The GAO has clearly declared that President Obama broke the law”, said Senator McCain. “The prisoner that President Obama illegally ordered released has joined another group hostile to our country and has led our enemies in the murder, rape and torture of innocent men, women and children. I personally can’t imagine anything worse a sitting President could do. In my mind it rises to the level of an impeachable offense.” It remains to be seen whether the House leadership believes Obama’s illegal acts in the Bergdahl exchange meets the legal requirements necessary to impeach. For now Fazi remains free in Iraq, conducting operations under the ISIS banner, instead of in the American cell where he was.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
You know this isn't true, don't you?
I don't know if it is true or not. Do you have some special knowledge on the subject?
Special knowledge? No.... but I can execute a simple google search in seconds..... http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/bergdahlisis.asp http://badsatiretoday.com/terrorist-exchanged-isis-commander/
Snopes lol. A liberal lying piece of shit. If you believe snopes you are stupid.
Sigh....... If you ignore the truth, you're stupid. "...Snopes lol. A liberal lying piece of shit..." Please cite examples of "lies" published by Snopes.
The "church" of Jameson. Meet his Pastors or maybe Gods. These two bosos that Jameson leans on are all knowing in his "mind".
Ok, so you have nothing.....right.? Of course not. Not a single example of "Snopes" publishing lies......
You are an amusing stooge. You come here and proclaim snopes is some kind of God site. That they are the arbiters of truth. When the people you worship are actually two homely liberal pieces of shit. You haven't proved this article inaccurate yet. You know the subject of the thread.
You're ridiculous, and this statement is a lie. The "national report" is satire. Look that word up, you clearly have no idea what it means. Your story is fake. As much as you want this story to be true, it simply isn't. http://realorsatire.com/nationalreport-net/ http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/05/fox-falls-for-fake-story-about- obama-personally/196304 http://www.onthemedia.org/story/news-website-nationalreportnet-fake/
That may be true. I said I don't know if it is true. I do know that snopes is run by snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit though.
So you feel that the people behind Snopes.com are "snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit".....right? Please tell me what has caused them to be a target of your hatred? Is it because they are different in their views than you? Are you so insecure in your commitment to whatever you claim to believe that you instantly label them (or anyone with whom you disagree) an enemy, and attempt to defame them? And FYI, I really don't care what their political leanings are, I do not feel that they are god-like, nor do I worship them. What is interesting, and what I hope you can learn from this discussion, is that it is not a binary world in which we live, and it is only when we choose to not limit our thinking that real progress can be made personally, intellectually, and spiritually. Wouldn't you agree?
Here snopes tries to spin why the piece of cat shit in the white house has a Connecticut social security number. The premise of this claim is also flawed in concept, as Barack Obama was born in United States and thus there would have been no reason for his grandmother to appropriate someone else's Social Security number for use by him. (Since non-citizens can legally obtain Social Security numbers the issue is irrelevant anyway, as possession of a Social Security number is not in itself an indicator of citizenship.) Likewise, the claim that Social Security numbers beginning with 042 are "reserved for Connecticut residents" is false. As explained by the Social Security Administration, the area number portion of a SSN does not (and never did) necessarily correspond to the state in which an applicant was born or resides; it simply reflects the mailing address which the applicant has requested his newly issued card be sent to. That mailing address does not have to be the same as the applicant's residence address: it can be the address of a friend, relative, employer, rented post office box, or anyone else authorized to receive mail on his behalf: The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.. Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived at the time he applied for his Social Security number in 1977 is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut). An item from February 2013 resurrected the claim that Barack Obama was using someone else's Social Security number, this time a SSN supposedly belonging to one Harrison J. Bounel: Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, he's the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today. The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that's the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes. This claim stems from nothing more than the observation that a search of a personal information database back in 2011 showed that the name "Harrison J. Bounel" had been mistakenly cross-indexed with Barack Obama's home address and Social Security number. (This type of error is common in such databases and has since been corrected.) Aside from that temporary erroneous entry, there is no evidence whatsoever that Barack Obama ever used the name "Harrison J. Bounel" as an alias, or that Barack Obama's Social Security number was originally issued to someone by that name. This issue is also not scheduled to be discussed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Birther attorney Orly Taitz has proffered claims of forged IDs and stolen Social Security numbers as "evidence" in a number of lawsuits challenging Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidency, and like all of her previous suits, Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. Variations: A 2014 version of this item included a preface crediting its authorship to Aissa Wayne, daughter of actor John Wayne: "For those of you who don't know ... at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this is John Wayne's daughter, also a Graduate of USC." Ms. Wayne is indeed a lawyer, but she had nothing to do with this piece — a query to her on the matter produced the following response: "Hi there! Thanks so much for checking with me; it's a complete hoax! Please pass this info along if possible. My office phone went nuts and I get tons of emails every day. Ugh." Last updated: 31 March 2014 Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ssn.asp#fcQPCiO1ccs8LlQo.99
There are no replies to Comment # 21. End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNational Report
#2. To: Jameson (#1)
You know this isn't true, don't you?
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
I don't know if it is true or not. Do you have some special knowledge on the subject?
#4. To: Jameson (#3)
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
If you believe snopes you are stupid.
#7. To: Jameson (#5)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#9. To: Jameson (#8)
Ok, so you have nothing.....right.?
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
You come here and proclaim snopes is some kind of God site.
#11. To: Jameson (#10)
#15. To: A K A Stone (#11)
I do know that snopes is run by snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit though.
#21. To: Jameson (#15)
Replies to Comment # 21.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]