[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Is Sneakypete To Gay To Understand This?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp ... ll-relationship-marriage-32680
Published: Jul 27, 2014
Author: | Bob Ellis
Post Date: 2014-07-27 20:25:03 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 1068
Comments: 2

I’ve seen few if any conservatives who can stay on point and stay on issue like Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation in this video. [Here's the short 4:25 video exchange between the homosexual and Ryan Anderson. Spot on response by Anderson, worth watching!]

In a forum, a homosexual man asks Anderson why he and his partner shouldn’t be able to file a joint tax return like married couples can.

While most conservatives (if they can even answer this question at all, to their shame) fall back on circular arguments and “just because,” Anderson illustrates where the principle embraced by the Left leads. Ideas have consequences, and if you are willing to embrace an idea, you must be willing to embrace where that idea leads.

When the homosexual man claims he can get married in California, Ryan responds: “You can be issued a marriage license in the state of California, but you can’t actually get married. And I’m sorry to say it that way, but given what marriage is, it’s not discrimination because everyone is equally eligible for entering into the marital relationship, where you understand marriage as a union of sexually complimentary spouses, a permanent, exclusive union of man and woman, husband and wife, mother and father.

“If you’re not interested in entering into that sort of a union, you’re not being discriminated against.”

He summarizes and concludes:

“It’s not that you don’t have the right to get married. It’s that you aren’t seeking out marriage. Marriage is by nature a union of sexually complimentary spouses, a unit of man and woman, husband and wife, mother and father. And just based on what you’ve said about yourself, it doesn’t sound like you’re interested in forming that sort of a union. It sounds like you’re interested in forming a union with another man, and that’s not a marriage.”

Anderson goes straight to the principle behind the whole issue, and won’t be distracted from it. This is why I always call counterfeit marriage what it is: counterfeit marriage. It is not “gay marriage.” It is not “same sex marriage.” It is most assuredly not “marriage.” It is counterfeit marriage, just like a counterfeit $20 bill is a counterfeit $20 bill, not “my $20,” not “another $20,” not “a different $20,” not “a special $20,” not “$20" at all.

Rights are not being denied to homosexuals. Homosexuals have the same right to get married that anyone else has, therefore, there is no discrimination or denial of rights whatsoever going on.

If a person isn’t willing to do what it takes to be recognized as something, then they have no right to be recognized as that something. If you aren’t willing to do the work it takes to run and win a marathon, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a marathon winner. If you aren’t willing to do what it takes to become a parent, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a parent. If you aren’t willing to start a small business, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a small business owner. If you aren’t willing to do the work it takes to become a Harvard graduate, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a Harvard graduate. If you aren’t willing to go to the police academy and do what it takes to graduate, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a cop. If you aren’t willing to serve in the military, you aren’t entitled to call yourself a veteran.

It isn’t rocket science, folks. All it takes is simple logic and reason, and a commitment to stick with the truth.

Conservatives: get your act together, learn about the issues, and then get about the task of defending what’s important. If you aren’t willing to do that, then you have no justification to bellyache about the Left’s attack on all that is right and good.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Marriage is by nature a union of sexually complimentary spouses, a unit of man and woman, husband and wife, mother and father.

Just a thought... Anderson fails to address the question, and instead focuses on the "definition" of marriage, in his opinion.

What should be discussed, is whether or not there is a legal difference between the tax status of a business partnership return-or a corporate return, and a personal tax return.

The argument can be made that because a business partnership does not have any duty to establish the sex of the partners...likewise a married couple has no duty to establish their respective sexes either......

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!"

Jameson  posted on  2014-07-28   11:06:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

too

/to^o/

adverb

adverb: too

1.

to a higher degree than is desirable, permissible, or possible; excessively. "he was driving too fast"

synonyms: excessively, overly, over, unduly, immoderately, inordinately, unreasonably, extremely, exorbitantly, very; More informaltoo-too

"invasion would be too risky"

•informal

very.

"you're too kind"

2.

in addition; also.

"is he coming too?"

synonyms: also, as well, in addition, additionally, into the bargain, besides, furthermore, moreover, on top of that, to boot, likewise More

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2014-07-28   22:49:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com