[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: Should Congress give ... Obama authority --- to attack Syria? Should Congress give Obama authority to attack Syria? Yes, the U.S. should do everything possible to topple Bashar Assad's regime Yes, this is a humanitarian mission of the highest order Yes, Syria's use of chemical weapons must be stopped at all costs Yes, the U.S. will never be taken seriously again if we don’t back up our posturing Yes, House Speaker John Boehner is right: Only the U.S. has the capability to stop Assad Yes, how can anyone look at innocent, suffering children and not act? Yes, even the Republican leadership is in favor of it. Bipartisanship has finally come to Washington Yes, John Kerry says the U.S. has evidence of Syria's sarin use, and I believe him Yes, it might help distract the media from all their so-called 'scandal' coverage and the impeachment movement Yes, the U.S. has to stop abuses like governments gassing their own people Yes, Syria's chemical weapons likely came from Iraq while it was ruled by Saddam Hussein. The U.S. must not let them get away again Yes, Congress should give the OK so Obama can continue making a buffoon of himself No, U.S. military action might not even have a real effect. The regime could use the affair as propaganda to stoke anti-Western sentiment No, there are no vital national security interests at stake in Syria No, the U.S. had more support going into the Iraq war, and look how that turned out No, not one drop of American soldiers' blood should be shed in Syria No, we have enough problems here to worry about No, we're already broke. How can we afford a war? No, didn't we learn our lesson from Egypt and Libya? No, we're supporting the wrong side! No, both sides are evil – but the current regime is better than what's coming if it's overthrown No, Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to new overseas military intervention No, let's pick our fights intelligently. This would be a weak, ineffective, face-saving, limited bombing of Syrians to maintain our credibility No, Obama still hasn't provided proof it was Assad who used chemical weapons No, this Syrian misadventure threatens to put the U.S. on a very perilous collision course with Russia, China and Iran No, this will be the beginning of World War III Other Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/no-syrian-war-to-save-obamas-face/#i4TzPQu0wWPC7hkp.99
Poster Comment: This is just a warm up for war - revolution in Israel !
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|