[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Coming full circle: Subpoena demands FBI return Hunter Biden laptop to Delaware repair shop owner

Famed Signature Room Restaurant in Chicago’s Hancock Tower Suddenly Closes Citing ‘Economic Hardship’

Pakistan: Politicians fight on live debate after Nawaz Sharif’s party leader calls Imran Khan ‘Jewish agent’ and ‘bootlicker’

FBI arrests Proud Boys member who disappeared days before sentencing over role in Jan. 6

Winklevoss twins secretly withdrew $280M in assets before crypto firm collapsed: sources

Leader in Richmond Democrat Party group ARRESTED after posting bomb threat against Andy Ngo Virginia talk

Riley Gaines shares video of trans male violence in school: ‘You can’t hide …’

Connecticut DCF Invites Children To Report On Non-Affirming Parents

Trans activists force anthropologists to cancel conference panel discussing the identification of male and female skeletons

Taiwan Launches the Island's First Domestically Made Submarine for Testing

Bail bondsman Scott Hall takes plea deal in Georgia election interference case

Supreme Court Returns To Mountain Of Cases From Conservative 5th Circuit

Facing A U.S. Anti-Corruption Push In Ukraine, Burisma Demanded Hunter Biden Call Dad

Investigators Subpoena Bank Records Of Hunter, James Biden After Uncovering $20 Million In Foreign Payments

San Diego declares a crisis as feds release thousands into the cit

Democrats sour on Bidenomics as it fails to move the needle for voters

‘Trust the Experts’: 1,600 Scientists Sign Declaration Denouncing Climate Change Hoax

US Refuses to Acknowledge Systemic Use of Torture by Its Armed Forces in Iraq

At the Brink?

As the FCC Revisits Net Neutrality, Let's Remember the Day the Internet 'Ended'

British intelligence in the dock for CIA torture

The End of the Road for the Dollar

Time to end the Fed and its mismanagement of our economy

Thanks to US Policy, CCP Controls Key Resources for US Weapons

Europa, a Girl From West Asia, Raped Again by an American Bull

Brickbat: Just a 'Regular Person'

FTC’s Amazon Complaint: Perhaps the Greatest Affront to Consumer and Producer Welfare in Antitrust History

Julian Simon: Expressing the Imago Dei in Economic Terms

It’s the Beginning of the End of This Whole Phony Economy

Russia Might Call for Extradition of Ukrainian Nazi Honored in Canada, Trudeau Blames Parliament Speaker

New York National Park Site to House Thousands of Migrants in Tent City

Review: Shiny Happy People Charts the Downfall of the Duggar Family

The Problem with a Chicago Municipal Grocery Store

Ukrainian Whoppers

Former major city police detective reveals 50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours post vaccine

August border encounters of more than 322,000 highest monthly total in U.S. history

Trump Accuses Pro-Life Groups of Being a Political Liability That Exist to Make Money

MINISTRY SPOTLIGHT: Women’s Resource Medical Centers of Southern Nevada

Washington’s Strategic Overextension

Trump adviser: GOP should ‘end’ primary debates, focus on Biden

When it Comes to Preventing Abuse, are All Churches Equal?

Methodist Community in Religious Freedom Fight Against NJ Regarding Sunday Beach Access

Imperial Footprints in Africa: The Dismal Role of AFRICOM

Biden warns Trump's MAGA 'extremist movement' is a threat to democracy

‘Quiet Crisis’: Food Banks Are Inundated With Requests For Aid As Inflation Bites

Illegal Immigrant Launches Unhinged Assault, Leaves Cop Missing A Body Part

¡Conquista! Illegals Plant Venezuela's Flag on Texas Soil

Biden’s DHSLet 200,000 Illegal Immigrants Fly Directly Into 43 Cities

Korean War Vet Booted to Street to Make Room for Illegal Immigrants

War of Economic Corridors: the India-Mideast-Europe Ploy

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other Computers-Hacking Articles

Title: Now That ItÂ’s in the Broadband Game, Google Flip-Flops on Network Neutrality
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/google-neutrality/
Published: Aug 4, 2013
Author: Ryan Singel
Post Date: 2013-08-04 21:23:26 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 1198
Comments: 1

In a dramatic about-face on a key internet issue yesterday, Google told the FCC that the network neutrality rules Google once championed don’t give citizens the right to run servers on their home broadband connections, and that the Google Fiber network is perfectly within its rights to prohibit customers from attaching the legal devices of their choice to its network.

At issue is Google Fiber’s Terms of Service, which contains a broad prohibition against customers attaching “servers” to its ultrafast 1 Gbps network in Kansas City.

Google wants to ban the use of servers because it plans to offer a business class offering in the future. A potential customer, Douglas McClendon, filed a complaint against the policy in 2012 with the FCC, which eventually ordered Google to explain its reasoning by July 29.

In its response, Google defended its sweeping ban by citing the very ISPs it opposed through the years-long fight for rules that require broadband providers to treat all packets equally.

“Google Fiber’s server policy is consistent with policies of many major providers in the industry,” Google Fiber lawyer Darah Smith Franklin wrote, going on to quote AT&T, Comcast and Verizon’s anti-server policies.

Google’s version, as it admits in its response to McClendon (.pdf), flatly prohibits subscribers from using “any type of server:”

Your Google Fiber account is for your use and the reasonable use of your guests. Unless you have a written agreement with Google Fiber permitting you do so, you should not host any type of server using your Google Fiber connection, use your Google Fiber account to provide a large number of people with Internet access, or use your Google Fiber account to provide commercial services to third parties (including, but not limited to, selling Internet access to third parties).

The problem is that a server, by definition, doesn’t have to be a dedicated expensive computer. Any PC or Mac can be a server, as can all sorts of computing devices.

Moreover, the net neutrality rules (.pdf)regarding devices are plain and simple: ”Fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.”

But Google’s legally binding Terms of Service outlaw Google Fiber customers from running their own mail server, using a remotely accessible media server, SSHing into a home computer from work to retrieve files, running a Minecraft server for friends to share, using a Nest thermometer, using a nanny camera to watch over a childcare provider or using a Raspberry Pi to host a WordPress blog.

None of those devices would do any harm to any broadband network, let alone a Google Fiber connection with a 1Gbps capacity equally split between uploading and downloading.

The server ban also prohibits you from attaching your personal computer to Google Fiber if you are using peer-to-peer software, because that works by having your computer be both a client and a server.

The Free Network Foundation is working on a “Freedom Box” — an open-source appliance you plug into your router that gives you ways to surf the net safely and anonymously; to help dissidents publish to the world; and to create open, distributed alternatives to Twitter and Facebook.

That too, by definition, is a server and thus banned by Google Fiber.

Google says its rule is “fully consistent with the Open Internet Order and Rules,” citing the provisions that allow for reasonable network management. (These provisions regulate what ISPs can do when congestion happens, and are not intended to provide an excuse to ban things that might cause congestion or threaten a business model.)

But in the Google Fiber forums, employees assure subscribers the rules aren’t meant to apply to Minecraft servers. And, in reality, Google Fiber probably won’t notice, let alone kick you off, for using a Slingbox or peer-to-peer software.

Call it net neutrality by the grace of cool Google employees.

But that’s not the vision of net neutrality that Google laid out in that friend of the court brief (.pdf) it signed onto in November, when it argued that the FCC’s aggressive net neutrality policing made it possible for Sling to succeed:

Sling, a company under joint control with DISH, has also witnessed the close link between non-discriminatory online access and infrastructure investment.

Sling is a combination of software and equipment that connects a user’s home set-top box, DVR, or DVD player to the Internet, allowing the viewing of live and recorded television from anywhere in the world—essentially ‘place shifting’ the home television experience to wherever the user is.

Sling was able to overcome initial resistance by Apple and AT&T for inclusion in the iPad platform (Order, 25 FCC Rcd. at 17925 35 n.107), and has been available on the iPad since 2009. Overcoming this initial barrier has promoted infrastructure investment in two ways.

First, the demand for the Sling equipment has risen many times over, partly due to the product’s availability on the iPad platform. Second, the consumption of content through Sling has increased commensurately, driving further demand for access and inviting greater infrastructure investment.

That’s D.C. tech-policy speak for: After the FCC strong-armed Apple into allowing iPhone users to connect to their Slingboxes, the public benefited with increased infrastructure investment by mobile providers and ISPs got more business.

Unfortunately for Google Fiber’s current stance, a Slingbox is a server. A home server.

So in Google’s version of net neutrality, the FCC was the right to force Apple to let iPhone users connect to their home servers, but the FCC has no right to force Google to let its broadband subscribers run a home server.

In November, Google said it was important for innovation that “the main broadband gatekeepers will not act unilaterally to constrain artificially the availability of new ‘edge-based’ content and services.”

Nothing is more edge-based than a citizen running a server on their own connection.

But, it turns out that Google’s real net neutrality policy is that big corporate services like YouTube and Facebook shouldn’t get throttled or banned by evil ISPs like Verizon, but it’s perfectly fine for Google to control what devices citizens can use in their homes.

We, it seems, are supposed to be good consumers of cloud services, not hosting our own Freedom Boxes, media servers, small-scale commercial services or e-mail servers.

That’s not what the net neutrality fight was about.

The fight was intended to make broadband services act like utilities that don’t care what a packet contains or what router, computer, phone or device you use, so long as you aren’t hurting the network.

In the net neutrality vision of the world, broadband providers simply deliver packets as they are paid to do.

When it was just a set of online services, Google happened to fall on the side of citizens and used to advocate against broadband companies controlling the pipes. Now that it’s an ISP itself, Google is becoming a net neutrality hypocrite.

The FCC has avoided addressing this issue, and in this case, simply forwarded to Google an “informal complaint.”

But now that Google’s shown what it really thinks of net neutrality, the door is open for the FCC to show that it’s serious enough about the principle to take on its former corporate ally.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

ISP's don't even worry about server upload bandwidth since it's a small fraction of downloads which is most of their traffic.

That's what I got from my ISP when I was pushing out a lot of live pics of the border.

Google needs the bandwidth to push your every keystroke to the Utah Data Center. There's good money in spying on the serfs! They've been a spy operation from day one.

Pressure cooker, backpacks, Obama sux! Can you hear me now?

The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote Third Party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2013-08-04   21:45:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com