[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
New World Order Title: NSA holds emergency hearing to fight off (Amash) anti-surveillance amendment in Congress The National Security Agency has invited certain members of Congress to a top secret, invitation only meeting to discuss a proposed amendment that could end the NSAs ability to conduct dragnet surveillance on millions of Americans. A letter circulated only to select lawmakers early Tuesday announced that NSA Director General Keith B. Alexander would host a question and answer session with members of Congress in preparation of a Thursday vote on Capitol Hill expected to involve an amendment introduced last month by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Michigan). That amendment, a provision tacked along to a Department of Defense Appropriations Act along with nearly 100 others, aims to greatly diminish the NSAs domestic spying powers in the wake of disclosures attributed to Edward Snowden, a 30-year-old former employee of Booz Allen Hamilton currently fighting extradition to the US where he faces charges of espionage for his role in leaking state secrets. One of the leaked files released by Snowden to the UKs Guardian newspaper details how the governments interpretation of the PATRIOT Acts Section 215 has allowed the NSA to collect call logs and other so-called telephony metadata pertaining to millions of Americans on a regular basis. If the Amash amendment is approved, it would end that authority. The amendment, as it appears on the House of Representatives Committee on Rules website, Bars the NSA and other agencies from using Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect records, including telephone call records, that pertain to persons who are not subject to an investigation under Section 215. Its not a partisan issue. Its something that cuts across the entire political spectrum, Amash told the Rules panel. In order for funds to be used by the NSA, the court order would have to have a statement limiting the collection of records to those records that pertain to a person under investigation, Amash said, according to Politico. If the court order doesnt have that statement, the NSA doesnt receive the funding to collect those records. Amashs suggestion isnt unheard of in the wake of a massive public backlash caused by Mr. Snowdens disclosures, but it certainly isnt sitting pretty with the NSA. According to Huffington Post, a letter circulated on Tuesday only hours after the Amash amendment was confirmed to be in order and expected to go up for vote this Thursday. "In advance of anticipated action on amendments to the DoD Appropriations bill, Ranking Member C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger of the House Intelligence Committee invites your Member to attend a question and answer session with General Keith B. Alexander of the National Security Agency," HuffPo quoted from the invitation. The meeting, added journalist Ryan Grim, was scheduled to be held at a security level of top secret/SCI and was only open to certain lawmakers, echoing the secrecy involved in the very programs Amash aims to shut down. In preparation for Amashs amendment going up for vote, the activism group Demand Progress has a campaign in hopes it will encourage Americans to ask their representatives to vote in favor of the bill. As the NSA spying revelations continue to unfold, we increasingly find ourselves facing the reality that -- at any moment -- the federal government could be listening to our phone calls, watching our email traffic, keeping tabs on our Internet browsing, or worse, the website reads. But now we have our first real chance to fight back. Speaking to Huffington Post, Demand Progress executive director David Segal said, To invoke that expert on surveillance George W. Bush: After this vote we'll finally know who is with us in the cause to protect civil rights -- and who is against us." A spokesperson for Rep. Amash told TIME Magazine on Tuesday afternoon that debate over the amendment is scheduled for Wednesday evening, with lawmakers expected to move for a vote the following morning. The amendment is being cosponsored by Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat from Amashs home state of Michigan.
Poster Comment: It's a good bet crybaby Boehner was invited. He hates Americans because we're free.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All, *Crime and Corruption* (#0)
(Edited)
The White House called the amendment a blunt approach that is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process. Naturally, the irony of that specific complaint resonates: The intelligence programs in question were not enacted with any of those forms of debate. To ask that their rescinding be held to a higher standard then their enaction is hubris of a real sort. http://www.infowars.com/move-to-stop-nsa-surveillance-program-defeated-in-house/ It came a lot closer to getting passed than I thought it would. The D&R tyrants killed it though.
Thanks for the follow up news on the vote. It was pretty close. Enough to keep the One Party sheeples happy and at each others' throats.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|