United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Lets Buy George Zimmerman An Assault Rifle
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 18, 2013
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2013-07-18 22:19:15 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 27207
Comments: 69
Lets take up a collection and buy George Zimmerman a high powered "assault" rifle. He might need it to fend off some liberal wack jobs. Anyone can send me funds and when we have enough money we will give the money to his attorneys so that they can give it to him to buy any kind of rifle he wants.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)
A large life insurance policy would reap a greater return, imho.
So he needs a few clips and rounds too huh. Ok folks be generous.
I'd chip into a 'term-life' insurance policy as a benefactor if someone is starting that fund. ;)
;) Why do you think he deserves to be killed? You think he is guilty?
Doesn't deserved to be killed but I can't prevent that from happening. As far as the guilty part? I would have went with manslaughter just because it was Zimmerman that engaged Martin by stalking him. Unfortunately for Martin, he was able to kick the shit out of Zimmerman's ass and Zimm pulled a piece and capped him. Zimmerman would have never approached Martin in the first place had he not been armed. Zimmerman was/is a coward but felt himself a 'big man' because he had his 'little brother' in his pocket. I see those types all over the place. Big fucking heros when they are packing but catch them without their 'piece' and they are as limp as a wet noodle.
I see those types all over the place. Big fucking heros when they are packing but catch them without their 'piece' and they are as limp as a wet noodle. Kind of like Trayvon Here huh?
I'm not following you on this comment. Trayvon was the one that didn't feel he needed a gun to 'stand his ground'. No, the brave one here was indeed Trayvon but yet, indeed he got killed for it. Wannabe cop Zim is the true coward in this whole affair, imo.
Come on. Going up and sucker punching some guy isn't bravery. He thought it was an easy mark. He was going to administer some whoop ass on him as Trayvons good Friend Jantel told Piers Morgan.
What the hell was Zim doing so close to Martin that he was able to grab onto him if he was being approached, stalked and threatened? No, the real one here that 'stood their ground' was Trayvon Martin.
Wasn't it dark out. Wasn't he running as Zimmerman and Jantel both said?
So zim actually was chasing him? For what, to be some hero? Did he see Martin commit any crime? You suggested 'freedom of movement', isn't Martin afforded that same right or perhaps not because he was black? Sim call 911 and they told him to stay in his vehicle. Why didn't he let the police handle it.
They were both free to move. The problem is when Trayvon apparently attacked Zimmerman. In the tape Zimmerman said Trayvon was possibly black. He wasn't sure.
There are no replies to Comment # 46. End Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Brian S (#5)
A large life insurance policy would reap a greater return, imho.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#6)
#8. To: Brian S (#7)
I'd chip into a 'term-life' insurance policy as a benefactor if someone is starting that fund.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)
#11. To: Brian S (#9)
Zimmerman was/is a coward but felt himself a 'big man' because he had his 'little brother' in his pocket.
#23. To: A K A Stone (#11)
Kind of like Trayvon Here huh?
#29. To: Brian S (#23)
Trayvon was the one that didn't feel he needed a gun to 'stand his ground'. No, the brave one here was indeed Trayvon but yet, indeed he got killed for it.
#32. To: A K A Stone (#29)
#36. To: Brian S (#32)
What the hell was Zim doing so close to Martin that he was able to grab onto him if he was being approached, stalked and threatened?
#40. To: A K A Stone (#36)
#46. To: Brian S (#40)
For what, to be some hero? Did he see Martin commit any crime? You suggested 'freedom of movement', isn't Martin afforded that same right or perhaps not because he was black?
Replies to Comment # 46.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]