[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Humor
See other Humor Articles

Title: Michael Savage on George Zimmerman: ‘You have to find this man guilty’
Source: dailycaller.com
URL Source: http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/04/m ... an-guilty-audio/#ixzz2YGy8xZiL
Published: Jul 6, 2013
Author: Jeff Poor
Post Date: 2013-07-06 09:45:48 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 7276
Comments: 22

Michael Savage on George Zimmerman: ‘You have to find this man guilty’ [AUDIO]

11:04 AM 07/04/2013, Jeff Poor

On his show on Tuesday night, talk show host Michael Savage said that George Zimmerman, who is currently on trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin, should be found guilty of second-degree manslaughter based on two things: 1) The state of his firearm and 2) The language he allegedly used on a 911 call when he was first reporting his suspicions about Martin.

But first Savage explained why his insight should be valued over others in the media covering the trial.

“I’m about to break an analysis that no one yet in the media has done, as you would expect from me — being the senior member of the American media and possibly the most insightful,” Savage said. “And I have to blow my own horn because everyone else tries to break my horn.”

“I will tell you that I broke the case down as follows,” Savage continued. “You want to hear it, or don’t you want to hear it? I know your mind is made up: White people generally think Zimmerman is innocent, except for liberals who are sure he is guilty; black people probably to the 99th percentile are sure Zimmerman’s a murderer. So where does Michael Savage fit in? I’m an independent observer and I call them as I see them, and I think Zimmerman committed what he’s being charged with: manslaughter. He didn’t intend to kill him, but he may as well have intended to kill him.”

Savage laid out his case, saying that the murder could have been avoided, but based on Zimmerman’s gun having a round in the chamber with the safety off, Zimmerman intended “to find some he could shoot or intimidate.”

“Zimmerman was carrying a Kel Tec semi-automatic 9mm handgun,” Savage said. “So? Big deal. It is a big deal because he had a bullet chambered in the gun and he had the safety off… Had he not chambered a round prior to meeting Trayvon, and had he not taken the safety off, even if Trayvon, during the altercation even if Trayvon had tried to grab the gun away from Zimmerman — had that gun not been chambered with a round and safety off, Trayvon Martin would have had to use two hands. You can’t do it with one hand.”

“Many of you don’t own guns,” Savage said. “He would have had to let go of Zimmerman. He would have had to stop punching him. He would have had to take both hands on the gun, hold the pistol grip with one, pull the top back to chamber a round and then he would have had to unlock the safety, during which time the mixed-martial-artist-in-training Mr. Zimmerman would have had time to throw him off and pound the hell out of him. But because Zimmerman carried a loaded weapon with the safety off, Trayvon Martin is dead. Therefore, the responsibility is in the hands of Zimmerman.

“I don’t care which side you are on,” Savage continued. “He wasn’t just carrying a gun, he wasn’t just a watch guy: He was hunting. He was looking, he was hoping to find someone he could shoot or intimidate with that loaded weapon, ladies and gentlemen of the Savage jury.”

In addition to that, Savage said the controversial 911 call was also damning.

“[Z]immerman says the back entrance and under his breath, he can be heard saying ‘f-ing,’ and the first word is ‘f—ing;’ the second word begins with a ‘c’ and ends with ‘ns,’” Savage said. “I didn’t make that up. It’s on the 911 tape. And I’m afraid that the fact that he has this racist statement — made this racist statement on the 911 call — and that he was carry a loaded gun with a bullet in the chamber and the safety off, you have to find this man guilty of second-degree manslaughter is my opinion. Something’s wrong with this whole story.”

That 911 call was debated back in March and April 2012, with some saying Zimmerman said “fucking coon” and others saying it was “fucking cold” or “fucking punks.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: CZ82 (#0)

“I don’t care which side you are on,” Savage continued. “He wasn’t just carrying a gun, he wasn’t just a watch guy: He was hunting. He was looking, he was hoping to find someone he could shoot or intimidate with that loaded weapon, ladies and gentlemen of the Savage jury.”

Yep. He brings up good points about the weapon. GZ was locked and loaded with the safety off, ready for mortal combat.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2013-07-06   10:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: CZ82 (#0)

"“Zimmerman was carrying a Kel Tec semi-automatic 9mm handgun,” Savage said. “So? Big deal. It is a big deal because he had a bullet chambered in the gun and he had the safety off… Had he not chambered a round prior to meeting Trayvon, and had he not taken the safety off, even if Trayvon, during the altercation even if Trayvon had tried to grab the gun away from Zimmerman — had that gun not been chambered with a round and safety off, Trayvon Martin would have had to use two hands. You can’t do it with one hand.” "

Not only is he a fool,he is a ignorant fool. Kel-Tec 9mm handguns don't HAVE safeties because they don't need them. They are single-action only,with a long fairly heavy 2-stage trigger. You will never cause the hammer to drop accidentally because the hammer is never cocked until the trigger is pulled.

Secondly,ONLY a fool carries a firearm for self-defense with a empty chamber.

Truthfully,even most fools are too smart to do that.

And finally,YES,you DO plan on killing somebody when you are attacked and feel like you are in danger of either serious bodily injury or death. If your plan is to get beaten to death or crippled,why bother to carry a gun at all?

It's hard to believe anybody takes that gas bag seriously.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   11:09:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

Yep. He brings up good points about the weapon. GZ was locked and loaded with the safety off, ready for mortal combat.

Fred,you are as ignorant as Savage when it comes to this.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   11:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

Yep. He brings up good points about the weapon. GZ was locked and loaded with the safety off, ready for mortal combat.

Fred,you are as ignorant as Savage when it comes to this.

BTW,why do YOU supposed people carry guns,if not to be ready for "mortal combat"?

Would they carry them to NOT be ready to defend their lives if necessary?

Maybe you think they carry them to look "cool",even though nobody knows they have them when they are concealed?

Or maybe you think they carry them because they are a little heavy on one side and lean that way unless they carry something on the other side to balance them out?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   11:13:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: sneakypete (#4)

BTW,why do YOU supposed people carry guns,if not to be ready for "mortal combat"?

You support Savage's point about GZ's probable state of mind and intent.

Do you think he would have acted differently had he not been armed? Being armed while on neighborhood watch duty was a no-no, although he wasn't technically on duty at the time.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2013-07-06   11:28:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Fred Mertz (#5)

You support Savage's point about GZ's probable state of mind and intent.

Of course not. Savage is a idiot that uses inflammatory language to "prove" a false point by exaggeration,but people carry guns to protect themselves from attack and/or loss of life. Sometimes this results in people who need to be killed getting killed. You ain't going to catch me crying over wannabe thug Martin's early death. Who knows how many lives Zimmerman saved by removing that turd from the gene pool?

Do you think he would have acted differently had he not been armed?

I don't know how he would have acting,and neither do you. I DO know that when I am armed I am always more cautious and willing to walk away from a confrontation than I am when I am unarmed. If someone threatens me when I am unarmed,I WILL put their shit out of order. If that same person were to issue the same threat when I'm armed,I will back away if possible. If they get pushy I will tell them I am armed and WILL kill them graveyard dead if they keep coming at me. So far everyone I have told this to has believed me and backed off. The first one that doesn't is graveyard dead. The difference is that when I am not armed I have no idea if the other guy and/or his pals are armed,and can't afford to turn my back to him/them or to allow him/them the upper hand in any respect. If I see him/them as a serious threat,I make sure he or the leader either goes unconscious or starts screaming like a little girl. The best defense really is a good offense. If I'm armed I can afford to just lay back and see where it goes. Unarmed and by myself,I need to be pro-active.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   11:52:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: sneakypete (#2)

Secondly,ONLY a fool carries a firearm for self-defense with a empty chamber.

Yea we had this same conversation on another thread, and those who dislike guns was saying just because he carried it "ready to go" he was looking to kill someone that night (Usual gun hater rhetoric)... They have absolutely no clue about self defense, other than to dial 911 and hope the cops get there before they're dead (Good luck with that)...

"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."

CZ82  posted on  2013-07-06   11:53:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: CZ82 (#7)

They have absolutely no clue about self defense, other than to dial 911 and hope the cops get there before they're dead (Good luck with that)...

They are still so ignorant and childlike that they don't realize people carry guns because cops are too heavy to carry,and it costs a fortune to keep them fed and hydrated.

They are obviously people who have never in their entire lives been in a actual threatening situation.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   12:12:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: sneakypete (#2)

Kel-Tec 9mm handguns don't HAVE safeties

Bingo.

We The People  posted on  2013-07-06   13:10:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: CZ82 (#0)

What makes Savage think that someone in Florida would walk around in the dark in an area where crime problems had been occuring with a weapon that they would not have at the ready just in case they were confronted by some criminal type? And just because they were confronted by a criminal type does not equate to shooting the confronter dead!

As it regards language on tapes, I heard the word that apparently Savage is so upset about could have been several words. Geeze......how good can tapes be when two mothers both swore under oath that the screams for help came from their own son.

I think Savage needs to think about this, er research, some more insteasd of patting his back or blowing his own whistle, or was that blowing his own horn!

rowdee  posted on  2013-07-06   13:56:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

GZ was locked and loaded with the safety off, ready for mortal combat.

Fred, this area had lately been under a good deal of criminal activity. Do you think anyone should walk around there in the dark without a weapon?

Further, what good would a weapon be if someone stepped out of the shadows in front of you and began attacking.....do you say, 'oh wait a minute, I need to chamber a bullet or turn off the safety now or should I wait til you bludgeon me to death or stab me to death or what?

He did not have the weapon in his hands ready to shoot--had he been doing that, perhaps an argument could be made that he was 'looking to shoot somebody'. But not necessarily.

Persxonally, I believe Savage is just trying to be controversial--did you notice his 'most white people, except liberals' comment...that tells me he is trying to be controversial. His world is full of orangutans and he's trying to rile the flocks indignational feathers up! Is it ratings month?

rowdee  posted on  2013-07-06   14:07:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

Besides all that, Fred, did you notice Savage used the medical examiner's comments to the efffect that 'the damage to GZ's cranium was not that bad--that it only needed bandaids'...

Do you honestly think that at the time his head was getting whacked into the concrete (the ME says l whack could have caused the two splits that were not lying next to each other--I donn't believe that either) that anyone would be capable of thinking they weren't getting beaten to death..that one would realize the person attacking you really wasn't going to smash your brains out.

Ordinary people would be thinking they were in a fight for their life.

rowdee  posted on  2013-07-06   14:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#2)

Secondly,ONLY a fool carries a firearm for self-defense with a empty chamber.

Exactly what my brother told me. By the way, you have mail here.

rowdee  posted on  2013-07-06   14:20:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Fred Mertz (#5)

You support Savage's point about GZ's probable state of mind and intent.

Do you think he would have acted differently had he not been armed? Being armed while on neighborhood watch duty was a no-no, although he wasn't technically on duty at the time.

CZ was playing 'Let's be a Vigilante'. Definitely a little man with a persecution complex.

Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET

mininggold  posted on  2013-07-06   14:43:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: sneakypete (#8)

They are still so ignorant and childlike that they don't realize people carry guns because cops are too heavy to carry, and it costs a fortune to keep them fed and hydrated.

Besides that the average cop ain't too bright and smells like donuts...

"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."

CZ82  posted on  2013-07-06   14:51:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: rowdee (#10)

As it regards language on tapes, I heard the word that apparently Savage is so upset about could have been several words. Geeze......how good can tapes be when two mothers both swore under oath that the screams for help came from their own son.

I think Savage needs to think about this, er research, some more instead of patting his back or blowing his own whistle, or was that blowing his own horn!

Truthfully I was surprised to see this article and it's point of view from him and that's why I posted it... It makes me wonder if he isn't going senile like a few posters who inhabit this place that want to see Zimmerman fry for protecting himself...

BTW I think this trial is more about self protection rights more than it's about putting a minority behind bars for shooting another minority... If he's found guilty you damn well other judges/juries will use this to make life rough on those who do have to protect themselves from the bad guys (and some politicians)...

Which one is the real George Zimmerman??

This one...

OR...... The Photoshopped Cracka image....

"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."

CZ82  posted on  2013-07-06   15:12:44 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: rowdee (#13)

By the way, you have mail here.

It didn't come through. I just checked.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2013-07-06   17:43:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: sneakypete (#17)

OK...I will try again.

rowdee  posted on  2013-07-06   19:44:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: mininggold (#14) (Edited)

Your head needs to cracked !

Trayvon is the end of the liberals - black race ...

they're all on a meltdown ---

there's no credibility - future left !

yes we con - dopes - chains !

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2013-07-06   20:29:59 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: rowdee (#11)

He [GZ] did not have the weapon in his hands ready to shoot--

I believe he may have had his weapon out. No way to tell right now.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2013-07-06   22:22:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: mininggold (#14)

Mary Lou Berry > cautiousnautious • 10 hours ago −

its a shame he was 17 and died... but there was two boys one the same age the other 14 that blew the face off a baby in a stroller...when was he to out grow the bad boy attitude... what when he killed somebody or caused serious bodily injury??? Martins attack on Zimmerman was uncalled for... we know that Zimmerman was screaming for help! We know that because anyone who listens to the tape to dispatch as much as 10 times and listens to those help calls can hear Mr. Zimmerman... and you also have witness testimony Mr. Jonathan Good who stated that He believed it was Zimmerman yelling for help... because 1. common sense he was on the bottom while Martin was on the top delivering what he thought to be blows... to Zimmerman's head.... 2. he also states that the Help cries came towards him not away from him... if it had been Martin the guy whose back was facing him...his cries would of been traveling away from him...but Zimmerman seen Good come out to his porch his face was facing him.... If someone is screaming for help that many times and the person who you say was in fear of his life etc... wouldn't he know by then to run away... he should know after the first punch that GZ... wasn't a stalker... cause he immediately started yelling for help ... and continued to yell for help.. but no help came.... when was Martin going to stop... what when George bled enough or when he cracked his skull and his brains fell out on the sidewalk... sounds like to Me Martin just cared about ONE thing... himself... he continued his assault even knowing Mr. Zimmerman was going back to his truck... How do I know this... because evidence show it... Trayvon Martin emptied the contents of the 7-11 bag... to use that 22 oz Arizona Can as an assault weapon he used to stun and bring down his victim... what else was his purpose of taking out the contents of that bag if not to use the can to bash in the face of the creepy *** who was watching him ... if anyone is a racist it was Trayvon --- those groups who support this violent behavior upon another human being.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/the-witness-zimmerman-prosecutors-didnt-call/

I have come to the conclusion through this ... no matter what they say otherwise --- it is impossible for these liberals to be human - Christians !

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2013-07-07   1:33:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

Savage is an arrogant know nothing fool.

Unless there is a LAW in place that forbids it, the ONLY way a weapon is ever carried for self defense is cocked and locked/ condition III.

There is NO safety on any revolver idiot, and Glocks et. al. all have TRIGGER safeties. Not that idiots understand any of that of course.

As usual the IDIOTS are making it up as they go along, (hey savage owns a gun so obviously he's an "expert" on carry right?).

What gets me is that anybody pays any attention to what that supercilious poseur says about anything.

who cares  posted on  2013-07-07   16:47:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com