United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Gun magazine maker who threatened to leave CO over magazine limits, now making smaller magazines
Source:
blogs.militarytimes.com
URL Source: http://blogs.militarytimes.com/gear ... m3-ms4-sling-and-mag-limiters/
Published: Apr 9, 2013
Author: n/a
Post Date: 2013-04-09 15:04:54 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 83028
Comments: 126
Magpul releases 10 round PMAG M3, MS4 sling and mag Limiters The PMAG 10 AR/M4 GEN M3 5.56×45 NATO magazine was designed to be your friend when working in the prone. Its shorter length means you can get lower and work fingertip mag changes instead of having to manhandle a larger mag under the gun. Incorporating new material technology and manufacturing processes for enhanced strength, durability, and reliability, the PMAG 10 provides next-generation performance for those needing lower profile magazines. $13.95 The PMAG Round Limiters install in 10, 20, or 30 round GEN M3 magazines, reducing the magazine capacity by 5 or 10 rounds. Designed for sporting and hunting applications, installation of the Limiter is simple, tool-less, and requires no permanent modification of the magazine body. Minus 5 PMAG Round Limiter and Minus 10 PMAG Round Limiter are both $13.95.
Poster Comment: I support universal background checks, the magasine limitation of ten rounds and strong restrictions on assault rifles. One can both support the second amendment and restrictions that help save the lives of people, especially those of children. There is no conflict in doing that.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#3. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Of course you do as you hate the constitution. You cannot support both. A right is a right not to be taken away by the whim of the evil government. Mike you are a liar. You are Mike. Since you are on anti depressants you shouldn't have a gun right? Do you deny you take medication for your depression? Why you so depressed Mike?
A right is a right not to be taken away by the whim of the evil government. Madison, Federalist 46, re the Militia by nolu chan - - - - - 10 USC 311 - MILITIA, Composition and Classes by nolu chan - - - - - Militia Act of 8 May 1792, provide for national defence by nolu chan - - - - - FBI — Table 20, Murder, by State, Types of Weapons, 2010 by nolu chan - - - - -
#5. To: nolu chan (#4)
Go beat off somewhere else, dickwad.
I think Madison was incorrect here. So are you on Obama's side in this gun control thing they have going on?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestOne can both support the second amendment and restrictions
#4. To: A K A Stone, Ferret Mike (#3)
You cannot support both.
Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it.
10 USC 311 - § 311. Militia: composition and classes (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States wo are members of the National Guard.
Militia Act of 8 May 1792. ...each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective states, resident therein, who is or shall be of the age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia....
Replies to Comment # 4.
#12. To: nolu chan (#4)
Let a regular army, fully equal to theresources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at thedevotion of the federal government; still it would not be going toofar to say, that the State governments, with the people on theirside, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number towhich, according to the best computation, a standing army can becarried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of thewhole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the numberable to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the UnitedStates, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half amillion of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by menchosen from among themselves, fighting for their commonliberties, and united and conducted by governments possessingtheir affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether amilitia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such aproportion of regular troops.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]