Title: CPAC Participant Defends Slavery At Minority Outreach Panel: It Gave ‘Food And Shelter’ To Blacks Source:
thinkprogress.org URL Source:http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20 ... y-minority-outreach/?mobile=nc Published:Mar 18, 2013 Author:Scott Keyes and Zack Beauchamp Post Date:2013-03-18 13:24:57 by Ferret Mike Keywords:None Views:5414 Comments:10
CPAC participant Scott Terry
NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland A panel at the Conservative Political Action Committee on Republican minority outreach exploded into controversy on Friday afternoon, after an audience member defended slavery as good for African-Americans.
The exchange occurred after an audience member from North Carolina, 30-year-old Scott Terry, asked whether Republicans could endorse races remaining separate but equal. After the presenter, K. Carl Smith of Frederick Douglass Republicans, answered by referencing a letter by Frederick Douglass forgiving his former master, the audience member said For what? For feeding him and housing him? Several people in the audience cheered and applauded Terrys outburst.
After the exchange, Terry muttered under his breath, why cant we just have segregation? noting the Constitutions protections for freedom of association. Watch it:
ThinkProgress spoke with Terry, who sported a Rick Santorum sticker and attended CPAC with a friend who wore a Confederate Flag-emblazoned t-shirt, about his views after the panel. Terry maintained that white people have been systematically disenfranchised by federal legislation.
When asked by ThinkProgress if hed accept a society where African-Americans were permanently subservient to whites, he said Id be fine with that. He also claimed that African-Americans should be allowed to vote in Africa, and that all the Tea Parties were concerned with the same racial problems that he was.
At one point, a woman challenged him on the Republican Partys roots, to which Terry responded, I didnt know the legacy of the Republican Party included women correcting men in public.
He claimed to be a direct descendent of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
The panel continued to be racked in controversy, as an African-American audience member repeatedly challenged the racism on display at this event. CPAC is the marquee conservative conference of the year, with speakers ranging from former Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney to Senator Marco Rubio.
Update:
K. Carl Smith, the panelist from Fredrick Douglass Republicans, released a statement following the media storm related to the racist outburst in his panel. Astonishingly, he reserves the brunt of his criticism for the female reporter who raised objections to the comments being made in the room:
I was invited by the Tea Party Patriots to conduct a breakout session entitled: Trump The Race Card and share the Frederick Douglass Republican Message. In the middle of my delivery, while discussing the 1848 Womens Rights Convention, I was rudely interrupted by a woman working for the Voice of Russia. She abruptly asked me: How many black women were there? This question was intentionally disruptive and coercive with no way of creating a positive dialogue.
In addition, a young man who wasnt a Tea Party Patriot, made some racially insensitive comments, he said: Blacks should be happy that the slave master gave them shelter, clothing, and food. At the conclusion of the breakout session, I further explained to him the Frederick Douglass Republican Message which he embraced, bought a book, and we left as friends.
Gee, this guy wouldn't be a Democrat dirty tricks campaign plant, would he? Still sharp as a bowling ball, huh Mike? Your self-righteousness affects your ability to reason.
war has to do something for entertainment; the voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
war has to do something for entertainment; the voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
The young man who made this *outburst* was more articulate than the panelist, go figure.
Meanwhile liberal heads explode at the idea that a southern white male has the audacity to express an opinion that runs counter to the Obama/Holder/Perez dogma.
"Your simplistic politically correct views of slavery are noted. "
It is a fact that the Stormfront.org folks, people devoted to getting their brand of racist activism out there showed up and successfully got heard when this gentleman stood up and generated controversy by promoting a racist point of view at CPAC.
I am well aware of this activism and recognize his verbiage as being laden with S.F. dot org White Nationalist bilge.
As far as your apples and oranges closing question goes; the economic hardship of the recession disproportionately hurt African Americans. Also that there are many in the Republican party who not only don't care about this, there are many more Republicans than Democrats who have racist viewpoints.
Look at people like Stone here who is loose with the N word and obviously hates African Americans for example.
This is a big reason this was a big news story about this man's comments at CPAC; it is obvious to many observers that many Republicans may not say the same thing as him, but they resonate with his words and don't walk the walk even if they talk the talk that they are against racial discrimination.
Communists are using low intelligence minority - pot heads - civil rights - social justice - engineering - advocates to advance their marxist - fascist neocom brave new world agenda !
The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle ...
just like the rainbow push coalition ---
like minded nazis !
Anarchist - libertarians ... want to achieve the same purpose - ends --- voluntarily !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
The simple fact is that blacks were slave traders in Africa and blacks were slave owners in the United States, and that conditions in Africa then were much worse than they were in America, just as conditions in Africa today are much worse than they are in America.
Fredrick Douglass was born in America where he got food and shelter and along the way learned to read and write. He escaped his bondage, got married and became a prolific writer. None of this would have happened or even would be possible were he born and raised in Africa.
Now the young man in the video knows these things (and more) and also knows they aren't taught in the government plantation schools, where most of our children are indoctrinated. Hence the question 'what does Fredrick Douglass's owner need to be forgiven for'? seems outrageous to the pointy-headed liberal mindset but in fact has a much deeper and broader context.
Finally, your automatic association of the Confederate battle flag with white extremists is off the mark, just as every person wearing a keffiyeh isn't a terrorist.