International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Afghan president orders US special forces to leave province over torture-related allegations
Source:
foxnews.com
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/0 ... o-leave-province-over-torture/
Published: Feb 24, 2013
Author: staff
Post Date: 2013-02-24 14:21:24 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 2073
Comments: 3
KABUL, Afghanistan – Afghanistan's president on Sunday ordered all U.S. special forces to leave a strategically important eastern province within two weeks because of allegations that Afghans working with them are torturing and abusing other Afghans. The decision seems to have caught the coalition and U.S. Forces Afghanistan, a separate command, by surprise. Americans have frequently drawn anger from the Afghan public over issues ranging from Qurans burned at a U.S. base to allegations of civilian killings. "We take all allegations of misconduct seriously and go to great lengths to determine the facts surrounding them," the U.S. forces said in a statement. Presidential spokesman Aimal Faizi said the decision to order the American special forces to leave Wardak province was taken during a meeting of the National Security Council because of the alleged actions of Afghans who are considered linked to the U.S. special forces. He said all special forces operations were to cease immediately in the restive province next to Kabul, which is viewed as a gateway to the capital and has been the focus of counterinsurgency efforts in recent years. The Taliban have staged numerous attacks against U.S.-led coalition forces in the province. In August 2011, insurgents shot down a Chinook helicopter, killing 30 American troops, mostly elite Navy SEALs, in Wardak. The crash was the single deadliest loss for U.S. forces in the war. Afghan forces have taken the lead in many such special operations, especially so-called night raids. "Those Afghans in these armed groups who are working with the U.S. special forces, the defense minister asked for an explanation of who they are," Faizi said. "Those individuals should be handed over to the Afghan side so that we can further investigate." A statement the security council issued in English said the armed individuals have allegedly been "harassing, annoying, torturing and even murdering innocent people." Ceasing all such operations could have a negative impact on the coalition's campaign to go after Taliban leaders and commanders, who are usually the target of such operations. Faizi said the issue had already been brought up with the coalition. The U.S. statement said only that the announcement was "an important issue that we intend to fully discuss with our Afghan counterparts. But until we have had a chance to speak with senior Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan officials about this issue, we are not in a position to comment further." Also Sunday, a series of attacks in eastern Afghanistan showed insurgents remain on the offensive even as U.S. and other international forces prepare to end their combat mission by the end of 2014. Suicide bombers targeted Afghanistan's intelligence agency and other security forces in four coordinated attacks in the heart of Kabul and outlying areas in a bloody reminder of the insurgency's reach nearly 12 years into the war. The brazen assaults, which occurred within a three-hour timespan, were the latest to strike Afghan forces, who have suffered higher casualties this year as U.S. and other foreign troops gradually take a back seat and shift responsibility for security to the government. The deadliest attack occurred just after sunrise -- a suicide car bombing at the gate of the National Directorate of Security compound in Jalalabad, 78 miles east of Kabul. Guards shot and killed the driver but he managed to detonate the explosives-packed vehicle, killing two intelligence agents and wounding three others, according to a statement by the intelligence agency. Provincial government spokesman Ahmad Zia Abdulzai confirmed the casualty toll and said the building was damaged in the attack. A guard also shot and killed a man in an SUV filled with dynamite that was targeting an NDS building on a busy street in Kabul, not far from NATO headquarters. The explosives in the back of the vehicle were defused. Blood stained the driver's seat and the ground where security forces dragged out the would-be attacker. Shortly before the Jalalabad attack, a suicide attacker detonated a minivan full of explosives at a police checkpoint in Pul-i-Alam on the main highway between Kabul and Logar province. One policeman was killed and two others were wounded, along with a bystander, according to the NDS. Also in Logar province, which is due south of Kabul, a man wearing a suicide vest was stopped by police as he tried to force his way into the police headquarters for Baraki Barak district, said Din Mohammad Darwesh, the provincial government spokesman. The attacker detonated his vest while being searched, wounding one policeman, according to Darwesh and the NDS. Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the Jalalabad attack and two others in the eastern province of Logar in an email to reporters. He did not address the attempted assault in Kabul.
Feb 24, 2013: A security official stands guard the scene of a suicide car bomb attack which killed and injured several people at the National Directorate of Security in Jalalabad, Afghanistan. (AP)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
What is happening here is what was destined to happen from the very day we stated we were staying there to nation build. You can NOT build nations that don't want to be built,and it was inevitable the government we supported was going to see the writing on the wall and start siding with the Taliban once we inevitably announced we were leaving. It's called "survival". In this case the SF team was most likely being too effective for comfort for the Taliban,and they applied pressure to the president,reminding him that soon the Americans would be gone but they would still be there.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
You can NOT build nations that don't want to be built,and it was inevitable the government we supported was going to see the writing on the wall and start siding with the Taliban once we inevitably announced we were leaving. It's called "survival". In this case the SF team was most likely being too effective for comfort for the Taliban,and they applied pressure to the president,reminding him that soon the Americans would be gone but they would still be there." An analogy would be a cop answering a domestic call where the wie was getting beaten up. The second the cop starts handcuffing the husband, sometimes thee wife will immediately start screaming and browbeating the cop. yup, sounds like you have this situation pegged well.
What is happening here is what was destined to happen from the very day that bush43 signed the Still classified September 14, 2001 Start of Hostilities against a state that had done nothing to us but demand a share of the Transit fee of the TAPI pipeline.... FIFY
#2. To: sneakypete (#1)
"What is happening here is what was destined to happen from the very day we stated we were staying there to nation build.
#3. To: sneakypete (#1)
What is happening here is what was destined to happen from the very day we stated we were staying there to nation build. What is happening here is what was destined to happen from the very day we stated we were staying there to nation build.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]