[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless

The Deleted Wisdom (1776 Report)

Sicko Transfaggots video

The Englund Gambit Checkmate

20 Minutes Of Black DC Residents Supporting Trump's Federal Takeover!

"Virginia Public Schools Deserve This Reckoning"

"'Pack the Bags, We're Going on a Guilt Trip'—the Secret to the Democrats' Success"

"Washington, D.C., Is a Disgrace"

"Trump Orders New 'Highly Accurate' Census Excluding Illegals"

what a freakin' insane asylum

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Libertysflame's Question of the Day: If we ban guns will there be an increase in knife related deaths?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 24, 2012
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2012-12-24 00:45:54 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 36002
Comments: 78

So I was thinking about all this talk of banning guns. If they ban guns do you think that there will be an increase in knife violence? I do. I know it If you are going to kill someone you are going to do it. Murder has existed since the first family. It will always exist. It is already against the law to kill someone. So by outlawing guns you are just taking peoples rights away and leaving them defenseless to someone can simply print out a gun and kill you anyways. It is pointless. Or is there an ulterior motive?

1. Would there be an increase in knife violence if guns were banned. (note you are dumb if you think they will stop with the guns currently targeted).

2. What is that ulterior motive?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

#15. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

So you are saying that people with violent tendencies are prone to use guns? I thought all violent criminals were liberals.

And liberals don't own guns.

mininggold  posted on  2012-12-24   11:04:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: mininggold (#15)

So you are saying that people with violent tendencies are prone to use guns?

Guns, knives, fists, gasoline, automobiles matches.

There are more murders by knife and feet then guns. FBI Crime statistics.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-12-24   11:14:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: A K A Stone (#20)

Guns, knives, fists, gasoline, automobiles matches.

There are more murders by knife and feet then guns. FBI Crime statistics.

I never said that there wasn't. BUT the conservative position is that the violent criminal element that prefers guns as it's weapon of choice tends to be more liberal than conservative and that the gun owning public tends to be very much more conservative than liberal. Both fallacies BTW but plenty believe them to be true.

Just like you still think I'm Lucy.

mininggold  posted on  2012-12-24   11:21:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: mininggold (#25)

BUT the conservative position is that the violent criminal element that prefers guns as it's weapon of choice tends to be more liberal than conservative

I don't recall anyone making that argument. But it is probably true as conservatives have better morals. For example "liberals" see nothing wrong with killing a kid. They think it is a right.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-12-24   11:25:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#27)

I don't recall anyone making that argument. But it is probably true as conservatives have better morals. For example "liberals" see nothing wrong with killing a kid. They think it is a right.

The conservative movement now claims the violent criminal element as their own? LOLOL I must have missed that.

Actually the Tea Party's corporate owners have NO morals.

mininggold  posted on  2012-12-24   11:29:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: mininggold (#29)

Actually the Tea Party's corporate owners have NO morals.

For example?

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-12-24   11:33:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 34.

#36. To: A K A Stone (#34)

For example?

CEOs routinely put their morals aside for the good of the corporation and stockholders which in all cases is to return a profit. Making money for the owners is always their primary concern, and their legally bound fiduciary duty.

mininggold  posted on  2012-12-24 11:45:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: A K A Stone (#34)

Actually the Tea Party's corporate owners have NO morals.

WHO are the Tea Party's Corporate Owners?

As you are so fond of saying,"Link,please".

sneakypete  posted on  2012-12-24 17:35:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com