[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: Eligibility judge quotes famous Santa case ... Cites paraphrased decision in 'Miracle on 34th Street'--- in Florida Democrat's challenge Eligibility judge quotes famous Santa case Cites paraphrased decision in 'Miracle on 34th Street' in Florida Democrat's challenge by Bob Unruh December 21 2012 Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. A real-life Florida judge has paraphrased a statement from the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper in Miracle on 34th Street to justify his sudden decision to dismiss a challenge under state law to Barack Obamas eligibility to occupy the Oval Office. The ruling from Kevin Carroll of the Florida circuit court for Leon County dismissed the case brought on behalf of Democratic voter Michael C. Voeltz, who raised the issue of Obamas qualifications under a state law that allows voters to challenge candidates eligibility. Carroll, who had given the plaintiffs until Dec. 23 to respond to Obamas motion to dismiss the case, changed his mind and abruptly Thursday ordered the case dismissed. He explained that the fact the government says Obama is qualified to be president is more than enough for him. This court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses and meets with congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world, Carroll wrote. As this matter has come before the court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film Miracle on 34th St. Since the United States Government declares this man to be president, this court will not dispute it. Case dismissed. It was the second time in eligibility cases that a judge appears to have abandoned legal fundamentals and simply ruled for Obama on no particular basis. Several years ago it was Judge James Robertson in Washington who dismissed a case because, he wrote, The issue of the presidents citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by Americas vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obamas two-year campaign for the presidency. Carrolls ruling also did not address the fact that in the movie, the judge was determining that a resident of a nursing home hired to play Santa Claus at a Macys store was, in fact, Santa Claus. His proof was a pile of mail addressed to Santa Claus that the post office delivered to him, confirming his identity. Attorney Larry Klayman, representing Voeltz in the case, immediately responded with a motion for rehearing, contending that the judge prematurely and precipitously dismissed the complaint without a hearing as outlined under state law. This act also flies in the face of this courts own order of Dec. 13, 2012, which was law of the case, noted Klayman, founder of FreedomWatchUSA. This court had a statutory duty under the Florida Election laws, the Florida and U.S. Constitutions, and 3 U.S.C. Section 5, to adjudicate defendant Obamas eligibility and his alleged fraudulent acts expeditiously, timely, and before the electors met on Dec. 17, 2012, and before the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2013, Klayman explained. Thus, this court also violated these law is dismissing the complaint summarily. Klayman suggested to the court its order at a minimum creates an appearance that it simply jettisoned this case not only on the extrajudicial and non-legal premise that President Obama was president during the prior four year term, and has already performed many presidential acts but also because this court did not want to be inconvenienced by holding an evidentiary hearing. Klayman also questioned Carrolls off-the-cuff remarks about a friend being appointed to a federal post by Obama as inappropriate. He said the remarks about fictional judge Henry X. Harper in Miracle on 34th St. also were inappropriate and showed a mindset simply to rid the court of this case. This court seems to want to sidestep having to reach these serious and important matters before it, Klayman said. Klayman is seeking a rehearing and an evidentiary hearing in the dispute. Hes also seeking a temporary restraining order to halt the delivery of the Florida electoral votes to Obama until the court case is resolved. He has submitted evidence by way of a sworn statement from Investigator Mike Zullo of Sheriff Joe Arpaios Cold Case Posse in Arizona that there probably were two crimes committed in the creation and display of Obamas long-form birth certificate, which was released by the White House and posted online. Zullos testimony is that forgery was used to create the document, and fraud was used in presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery the White House represents as proof positive of President Obamas birth documentation. Arpaios affidavit also was presented to the judge. The sheriff said: My investigators and I believe that President Obamas long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House.
There is probable cause that the document is a forgery. Klayman has argued that Obama has never established his eligibility for the presidency of the United States
the only evidence of defendant Obamas alleged birth within the United States has come in the form of a belatedly filed electronic version of a claimed long-form birth certificate posted on the Internet. He told the judge that the evidence suggests, however, the document is fraudulent. The case claims that should the judge not address the facts, the plaintiff can never be made whole again. If defendant Obama is found to be ineligible, which is likely to happen since there is no evidence
Obama was born in the United States to U.S. citizen parents, the plaintiffs vote in the 2012 presidential election will be nullified. He suggested state law calls for an expedited hearing in such cases. Carroll, however, said the state of Florida does not have jurisdiction to determine the issue of qualification for the office of president of the United States, particularly at this late date in the process. His comments came after another challenge filed by Voeltz earlier this year was dismissed because the judge ruled it couldnt be addressed until after the election. In the latest case, Klayman argued: On Nov. 6, 2012, the state of Florida held its 2012 general election. On Nov. 10, 2012, defendant Barack Hussein Obama was declared the official winner of the Florida general election. Yet defendant Obama has never established his eligibility for the presidency of the United States. Indeed, neither defendant Obama, nor the Democratic Party of Florida, has even stated that defendant Obama is a natural born citizen, the filing said. The only evidence of defendant Obamas alleged birth within the United States has come in the form of an electronic version posted on the Internet. However, there has been evidence to show that this birth certificate has either been altered or is entirely fraudulent. When Obama wanted the case dismissed, Carroll on Dec. 13 gave the plaintiffs 10 days to respond. But he didnt wait for that time to pass and dismissed the case anyway. Section 102.168(7), Florida statutes, provides that any candidate, qualified elector, or taxpayer presenting such a contest to a circuit judge in entitled to an immediate hearing, Klayman wrote. Plaintiff Michael Voeltz specifically requested an expedited hearing in his prayer for relief.
Yet even if he had not specifically requested such relief, which he did, the Florida statutes still mandate that plaintiff is entitled to an immediate hearing by law simply through the act of filing the lawsuit in front of a circuit judge. The case said, Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States, and its Constitution, which plaintiff must protect and defend by oath. As WND reported, Voeltz, who identifies himself as a registered member of the Democratic Party, voter and taxpayer in Broward County, has challenged Obamas eligibility, arguing that the natural born citizen clause was rightly understood in historical context to mean a child not only born in the U.S., but born to two American-citizen parents, so as not to have divided loyalties. Obama, however, readily admits to being born a dual citizen because of his fathers British citizenship. Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? Heres WNDs complete archive of news reports on the issue The original case sought to exclude Obama from the 2012 ballot. Klayman and Voeltz claimed that Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, because he was born a British subject. Plaintiff Michael C. Voeltz has standing, as a Florida voter, and taxpayer, to challenge the nomination or election of any person to office based on the winning candidates eligibility for the office sought.
The state of Florida has chosen, by popular election, the electors for Defendant Barack Hussein Obama to be president
Plaintiff has fulfilled all aspects of the Florida election statutes for this challenge of eligibility, as to timing, venue, and indispensable parties. Klayman has argued that since Obama, by his own admission, was not born to two citizen parents, he is not a natural born citizen and, therefore, is ineligible to be a candidate on the states election ballot. The filing also explained the judiciary has the power to determine eligibility. The contest of election statute specifically created a cause of action to enable plaintiff, a registered elector and taxpayer, to bring this lawsuit in order for this court to determine the eligibility of defendant Obama. Klayman said he also will be trying to go directly to the Florida Supreme Court if Carroll does not reconsider. Its truly remarkable and an affront to the rule of law and all our founding fathers and colonial America fought and risked and gave their lives for. This type of conduct by the establishment, which thinks it can do as it pleases without consequences, is why we have entered into a revolutionary state 236 years after we declared independence from the king. They will soon from We the People learn that there are consequences, he said. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/eligibility-judge-quotes-famous-santa-case/#UgcMvLjMkvudK20u.99
Poster Comment: monarchy - theocracy america
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
merry marxmas The stockings are hung with care ! We're a de facto monarchy now ! THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS by Clement Clarke Moore or Henry Livingston 'Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse; The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there; The children were nestled all snug in their beds, While visions of sugar-plums danced in their heads; And mamma in her 'kerchief, and I in my cap, Had just settled down for a long winter's nap, When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter, I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter. Away to the window I flew like a flash, Tore open the shutters and threw up the sash. The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below, When, what to my wondering eyes should appear, But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer, With a little old driver, so lively and quick, I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick. More rapid than eagles his coursers they came, And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name; "Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now, Prancer and Vixen! On, Comet! on Cupid! on, Donder and Blitzen! To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall! Now dash away! dash away! dash away all!" As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky, So up to the house-top the coursers they flew, With the sleigh full of toys, and St. Nicholas too. And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the roof The prancing and pawing of each little hoof. As I drew in my head, and was turning around, Down the chimney St. Nicholas came with a bound. He was dressed all in fur, from his head to his foot, And his clothes were all tarnished with ashes and soot; A bundle of toys he had flung on his back, And he looked like a peddler just opening his pack. His eyes -- how they twinkled! his dimples how merry! His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry! His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow, And the beard of his chin was as white as the snow; The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth, And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath; He had a broad face and a little round belly, That shook, when he laughed like a bowlful of jelly. He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf, And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself; A wink of his eye and a twist of his head, Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread; He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work, And filled all the stockings; then turned with a jerk, And laying his finger aside of his nose, And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose; He sprang to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle, And away they all flew like the down of a thistle. But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight, "Happy marxmas to all, and to all a good-night."
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|