[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
WORLD WAR III Title: I Fear the Government and the Obedient Sheeple, More Than I Fear Guns I do not intend to write something here to convince the emotionally hysterical gun-control crowd to abandon their fantasy of removing guns from the world. They live in a fairyland and there appears to be no way to change their minds. Nor am I trying to even convince the so-called conservatives, the Republicans, the alleged "gun-rights" advocates to stop it with their kowtowing. This is really just a rant (albeit an informed rant). But I do want to note that the point of the right to bear arms which is a right, by the way, not a government-granted privilege is for people to have the means to defend themselves, not just from everyday criminals and predators, but mainly from government tyrants and their minions. I just dont understand the so-called gun defenders and gun store owners suddenly joining the irrational hysterics of "Why would anyone need an assault rifle, or military-style weapon? We should ban those." Well, as history has shown, if youre going to forbid the civilian population from having certain firearms, then for your own safety you will have to forbid police and military from having them too. But a lot of people dont seem to understand that. They trust government police and military. A lot of people feel safe with an armed government and a disarmed civilian population. (It really should be the other way around!) And why is almost no one from the gun-rights crowd pointing out that its really the governments gun restrictions, gun-free zones and "zero tolerance," in which honest, law-abiding civilians (e.g. teachers, school administrators and other adult school workers) are forcibly disarmed by government bureaucrats and police, that increases the vulnerability of these children to an attack by an armed intruder? This is why I call people "sheeple," "zombies," and assert that many people now are totally hypnotized and brainwashed to love and adore their most vicious predators and threats to society: The State and its loyal flunkies. For clearly, Washington is preparing for something, whether it is economic collapse and civil unrest, "natural" disasters, or civil war
Whatever it is, its something, and we know the bureaucrats are preparing for something, given the Department of Homeland Securitys purchases of hundreds of millions of hollow-point bullets and high-powered battle rifles, Barack Obamas Executive Orders to seize control over mass communications in America and seize U.S. infrastructure and people involuntarily, Obamas preparing the FEMA rendition camps (not to mention the many coffins and mass graves being prepared), the U.S. Armys manual which outlines a plan to kill rioters and demonstrators, the Armys training troops to drive tanks through U.S. streets, FEMAs preparing for food storage confiscation, and more unconstitutional and criminal Obama-police state policies now. There is also Obamas NDAA provision of indefinite detention of Americans, which gives the President the power to have the military seize and detain indefinitely anyone that the President or his minions have deemed a "terrorist," a "combatant," or otherwise a criminal, without providing any evidence against the accused. Obama also has claimed the power upheld by the court bureaucrats to assassinate anyone he chooses, based on his own reasons, without any due process or any evidence against the accused. A widely publicized example of that was Obamas assassination of Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, whose only "crime" was criticizing U.S. foreign policy within his religious sermons, totally protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (I have addressed that here and here.) You see, the power-grabbers have started with the Muslims, after the widespread post-9/11 brainwashing of Americans toward anti-Muslim prejudice and acceptance of anti-Muslim government policies and militarism. So, thanks to the sheeple zombies approval of the post-9/11 hysterical "War on Terror," Washington has now been cracking down on speech, critics of stupid government bureaucrats, political dissent and government whistleblowers. But start with the Muslims and they will go on from there. More recently, former Marine Brandon Raubs Facebook posting questioning the governments official explanation for 9/11 caused such a stir, he was criminally abducted by Secret Service and local authorities and involuntarily detained in a psychiatric ward. He is not the first victim of the States such crimes, as there have already been others in recent years. Among the Obama Regimes war on whistleblowers, Army Private Bradley Manning suffered major abuse during his extensive pretrial military imprisonment. Manning allegedly released videos and documents to WikiLeaks exposing our own government bureaucrats war crimes in Iraq and the bureaucrats incompetence and corruption as well. Former CIA asset Susan Lindauer was another government whistleblower who has already suffered at the hands of the un-American central planning degenerates in Washington. More examples of the government bureaucrats war on speech, political dissent and government criticism include former Obama Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, who wants to "cognitively infiltrate" Internet sites and social media, and Obamas new law in which Constitutionally-protected protests will be stifled. And even Facebook has suspended the account of a user who questioned the official narrative involving the Sandy Hook, Connecticut school shooting. But it is clear that Washington wants to stifle criticism and dissent amongst the masses, and us schmucks who do have a right to criticize the most buffoonish and imbecilic bureaucrats who have ever pervaded Washington, DC and who should be criticized, lambasted, raked over the coals, satirized, lampooned all totally protected by the First Amendment, regardless of what the Supreme Bureaucrats say and/or whether theres a "War on Terror" or not. Besides the governments cracking down on free speech, it has become oppressive in other ways. Examples include the TSAs VIPR teams now invading the bus terminals, Amtrak stations (which is being encouraged by all the filthy government hand-outs, of course), and on roads and highways, the government siccing S.W.A.T. teams on alleged student loan defaulters, and the FDAs war on raw milk. As Jon Rappoport noted, government bureaucrats dont like it when the people over whom they rule do things on their own. That is why government bureaucrats are now forcing independent-minded people back on the government-controlled grid. The government bureaucrats dont like it when the people express their own independence and who show that they do not need those government bureaucrats, or their alleged "security" workers to defend the people. That is why government bureaucrats insist on "gun-free zones," in which children are left vulnerable to attackers, rather than allowing the adults at the school to be armed to protect those children from real harm. "Lets put a police officer or security guard in the school," the compromisers cry. However, locking down the schools like this turns the kids into prisoners, and wont protect them. The near impossibility of being able to reach those who can rightfully be considered "sheeple" is frustrating now. For those who are still in denial of the possibility that the U.S. government could possibly ever turn the guns on the people, there is already precedent of this. During the 19th Century American War on Independence, besides President Abraham Lincolns State-murders of many thousands of innocent civilians in the South and his armys murders of hundreds of military protesters in the North, as Thomas DiLorenzo pointed out, Lincoln illegally suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus and imprisoned tens of thousands of Northern political critics without any due process; shut down hundreds of opposition newspapers...censored all telegraphs; rigged elections; imprisoned duly elected members of the Maryland legislature along with Congressman Henry May of Baltimore and the mayor of Baltimore; illegally orchestrated the secession of West Virginia to give the Republican Party two more U.S. senators; confiscated firearms in the border states in violation of the Second Amendment
And there are other examples of those abuses, committed by Presidents Woodrow Wilson and FDR, besides the more recent examples. And regarding the right to bear arms, a lot of people actually find it absurd if you point out how Hitler took advantage of gun control laws already in place, and further strengthened them to disarm Germans, mainly the Jews. So had Jews in Germany been able to exercise their right to bear arms, many of them might have been able to resist the Nazis from abducting them and taking them to their deaths. (See David Kopel and Richard Griffiths on that issue.) It really should be the reverse of what the sheeple want: We would be much better off, much safer and more secure with an armed civilian population and a disarmed government! Finally, while Premier Obama violates his oath to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States" on a daily basis, one individual who has declared with very strong and straightforward language his personal pledge to resist the fascist disarmament campaign is Stewart Rhodes, Founder of the Oath Keepers organization. Included in his statement of resistance, Rhodes declares, I pledge to refuse compliance with any and all laws that attempt to strip me and my children of those arms
I will use nullification, civil disobedience, and active resistance against all such laws. I will nullify, disobey, and resist as an individual, and I will work with my neighbors to nullify, disobey, and resist as towns, counties, and states. We will not disarm, we will not comply, and we will resist
I pledge to defend myself, my neighbors, my town, county, and state, against any attempt to forcibly disarm them pursuant to any "assault weapons ban" or any other illegitimate "law" passed by oath breakers within Congress, or pursuant to any illegitimate order, action, or decree by the oath breaker within the White House. We will not disarm. We will resist. And if given no other choice but to fight or to submit to abject tyranny, we will fight, just as our forefathers in the American Revolution fought against the tyrants, usurpers, and oath breakers of their day. If we are presented with the "choice" of submission to tyranny or fighting in defense of our natural rights, we will fight, as our forefathers fought, when the British Empire attempted to disarm them and confiscate the military pattern arms, ammunition, and supplies of their time. We will make the same choice as Patrick Henry made, when he rejected "peace" purchased at the price of chains and slavery, and said "I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!" I too choose liberty or death. I hereby reaffirm my oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and pledge my life, my fortune, and my sacred honor in defense of the principles of liberty enunciated in our Declaration of Independence, for which our forefathers spilled their blood. We will not let the Republic fall without a fight. And he means it. I dont know anyone personally who has the guts to declare such a strong statement of resistance to government tyrants. I know I dont. But we do need more Stewart Rhodes in America, thats for sure. (And fewer buffoonish, dangerous government bureaucrats, thats for sure.)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
So how's the Scalia Coup and 9/11 with the Patriot Act and our Continuing State of Emergency workin' for ya. Guns helping you out there? ;}
Guns helping you out there? ;} He's afeered of that too. The whole Tea bagger movement shoots at shadows. LOLOL Pretty soon they will be shooting each other, as the physical expression of their true nature will not be denied.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
As usual, your post demonstrates that you're merely another sheeple. Let's be blunt: you're a fucking parasite, who doesn't care what host she sits on, as long as she can suck the life-force out of someone, anyone else. You think it's a marriage made in Heaven. The problem? The producers of society, like me, are SICK of your fucking bullshit. I want a divorce. And if it turns out, that idiot cunts like you end up with a hole in your empty little head, than I'll be just a bit happier... because that's what you fucking deserve, you idiot bitch. I tried to keep the reply simple, so you'd actually understand how much I fucking HATE you parasites. I in any way unclear? The only acceptable answers are "yes" or "no." Anything else, is an admission that you're fucking STUPID, as well...
Yet like most sheep you claim to be afraid of everything and also a grandiose asshole.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
See Boehner and his Crazies for details. It's gotten so bad that Obama has to pretend he has an opposition.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|