The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: DOE Investigates Instructor Expressing Opposition to Homosexuality (Obama's queer police)
Source:
Infowars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/doe-investi ... g-opposition-to-homosexuality/
Published: Dec 3, 2012
Author: Infowars.com
Post Date: 2012-12-03 13:50:00 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 47845
Comments: 65
The Department of Education has launched a federal investigation into comments made by an ROTC instructor in an Alabama school district. After ROTC 1st Sgt. Lynn Vanzandt told a class he opposes same-sex relationships, a 15-year old student contacted GLBT Advocacy and Youth Services. The group complained to the school on behalf of the student, according to the Christian Post. In November, the Department of Education involved the federal government in the compliant. It wrote a letter to GLBT Advocacy and Youth Services. The federal agency informed James Robinson, director of GLBT Advocacy and Youth Services, that the department would investigate whether or not students were “subjected to a hostile environment on the basis of sex or harassment based on failing to conform to gender stereotypes.” DOE also said it would the government will determine if the school district “retaliated against the student… by failing to respond and take action reasonably calculated to stop the peer bullying.” In addition to DOE and the homosexual advocacy group, an atheist organization based in Wisconsin, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, has involved itself in the case. The organization emailed the school district’s superintendent and claimed Vanzandt “bullied” students and “preached” his belief that homosexuality is wrong to them. The DOE response follows a report 2009 survey performed by the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a gay activist organization founded by former Obama administration’s Education Department official Kevin Jennings. “Harassment and bullying are serious problems in our schools, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students are the targets of disproportionate shares of these problems,” the letter sent by Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated. The instructor has since apologized to the students for expressing his opinion about same-sex relationships. The Freedom From Religion Foundation responded by stating that an apology isn’t enough. The Department of education is at the forefront of homosexual advocacy in public schools. In 2011, DOE sent a letter to federally funded schools about establishing clubs on campuses, specifically Gay-Straight Alliance clubs for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students, CNSNews reported on July 8, 2011.
Poster Comment: Obama's Education Secretary (Arne Duncan) Supports Gay High Schools. A Mitt Romney clone. 
Photo: Drab Mayko. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
They just can't stand any criticism whatsoever about their "problems"...
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
It was never about tolerance, equal rights and 'gettin along.' It has always been about controlling information, indoctrination and silencing opposing views. It started out 20 years or so ago as "leave us alone and we will leave you alone" (close to the definition of tolerance); then it turned to "you must endorse or accept us" ; to now it is "if you don't accept us and our message, we will use the full force of government to silence you and indict you." Who is the bully now? Notice the "friends" of the gay lobby tyrants...government and atheists. What a cozy relationship.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
They just can't stand any criticism whatsoever about their "problems"... It is the definition of intolerance. Their reaction should have been to debate the cadet 1st SGT, not try to indict. They don't want to debate, they want to indoctrinate and punish those that have opposing views. As my post above notes, it is not about tolerance. It is about controlling the narrative. If you continue to threaten pubic institutions (private ones too) by suing them, they hope to silence opposing views. The gay lobby and the unelected gov't officials and atheist groups are the very "best" of King George III. They are tyrants and our Constitution is supposed to protect us from them. But with the reincarnation of George III on the throne at 1600 Pennsylvania ave, tyrants rule the day.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
It started out 20 years or so ago as "leave us alone and we will leave you alone" (close to the definition of tolerance); then it turned to "you must endorse or accept us" ; to now it is "if you don't accept us and our message, we will use the full force of government to silence you and indict you." Who is the bully now? Notice the "friends" of the gay lobby tyrants...government and atheists. What a cozy relationship. I love how you homophobic Bible thumpers try to twist things to suit your agenda. Fortunately, most see through it today.
Fortunately, most see through it today. Have you ever read the Bible?
Nope.
Nope. Maybe if you read it you would change your views. Maybe not. Consider this meguro. What if it is the word of God? Shouldn't you read it just in case? Or at least part of it?
Silencing morality!!
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
What if I'm God? You better kneel down before me just in case.
Fortunately, most see through it today. Meguro, if you read my other posts on this subject you would know I fully support the original Oregon law. It gave all the legal equivalents to other than traditional marriage people. I support it because it also protects single moms who are trying to make a living and widows. But it was not good enough for your lobby so they had to add a 'marriage' clause to the updated Oregon bill.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
Naaah. It's about more regulation of people's private lives.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
"My lobby" eh? LOL! What's wrong with adding a marriage clause? It IS a marriage. Separate but equal? I think not. We did away with Jim Crow laws years ago.
You are doing the 'work' of the gay lobby in your statement. How? By using "Jim Crow" as a vehicle of argument to silence an opinion. Using the "hate" and "race" card is not an argument. Marriage is defined as a union of one man with one woman. You can call your unions whatever you want, but it is not marriage as defined for centuries. Your "unions" are different and if you want the same legal priviledges you can legally fight for them. But whatever it turns out to be, it is not marriage. You cannot change an absolute.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
I'm not silencing anyone's opinion. You're free to voice it, and you are doing it right here, loud and clear. I'm bringing up Jim Crow, since your "world view" about marriage is inherently discriminatory, just as Jim Crow was. Marriage is defined as a union of one man with one woman. According to your world view? Your religion? What exactly? You can call your unions whatever you want, but it is not marriage as defined for centuries. Whether or not that's true, so what? Things change over time. We do not live in a stagnant, static vacuum. We correct social injustices in our society (such as slavery and denying women the right to vote), and we become better people as a result. Denying gays the right to marry their lovers is another such social injustice in need of correcting. Your "unions" are different and if you want the same legal priviledges you can legally fight for them. We're fighting for marriage, and we're winning. I know it rocks your world view, and I'm sorry about that, but that's how it goes. You're free to live your life repressed, homophobic, and ignorant, but you have no right to drag us into your flawed, myopic world view. But whatever it turns out to be, it is not marriage. You cannot change an absolute. Of course we can, and we are.
Which ones?? The pervs or the straights??
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Don't ya just love how they bring up Jim Crow laws to "try" and make their point... But then they turn right around and vote for those people who enacted those laws in the first place!!! LOL....
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Of course we can, and we are. I have never played a piano, or conducted but I want to be called a Maestro. That is your argument. Please don't lead me to having to explain the biology here. So please if you want to respond you should address me as Maestro.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
Heh it's works as good as that anti-semetism accusation you guys always throw around and is actually based on historical fact. But the original perps of Jim Crow laws would now be Republicans thanks to Nixon finding them their true home.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
So please if you want to respond you should address me as Maestro. Open your eyes and smell the coffee, Maestro. Gay marriage already exists in certain US states. Don't you right-wingers believe in states rights?
Do I have to explain the details of consummation of marriage and the purpose of producing legally recognized descendants? Marriage is not just a legal contract that allows you benefits and legal rights.
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; 6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct[a] your paths.(Proverbs 3:5-6)
The point is hatred of someone or something is a waste of time... And it's usually brought about because of something that isn't true anyway!!
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Then why are the courts trying to force gay marriage on states that don't want it and their citizens have voted aginst it???
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Actually that would be an excellent idea...
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Your church can refuse to marry gay couples. I don't give a rat's ass because I don't belong to your church. But what if a religious institution does choose to marry gay couples?
What if the citizens of your state don't want you to live there, and they vote to have you move. Should you be forced to move? What gives you the right to tell others who they can or cannot marry? If you're referring to Prop 8 in CA, the court ruled that law unconstitutional. Laws that are deemed unconstitutional cannot exist, even if voted on by the people. So endeth today's civics lesson.
You can marry. A woman. What gives a sex offender like you any rights? I mean because you are mentally ill we should allow you do redefine marriage. No thanks sex offender. You're lucky we let you walk the streets unsupervised. Speaking of the special status you seek as a sex pervert. I think if one of you freaks has aids it should be publicly announced. Why should we let sex offenders go and infect normal people? We shouldn't. Perhaps you freaks should be tatooed so normal people can stear clear of you. I mean I don't want you to flip the same light switch I flip let alone sit on the same public toilet. You should have to use a special toilet so as not to spread your homo diseases to normal good people. More on your special rights. Why should I have to pay for your aids treatment. If you get infected through perverted sex you should either die or pay for the remedy yourself. I'd rather take my kids to the movies then pay for some queers healthcare. Why should my kids miss the movies just so you can live?
Why do I have to live on the same planet as a wacko dipshit like you?
You don't. I hear a lot of you queers suicide out.
After you, dipshit.
I'd rather take my kids to the movies then pay for some queers healthcare. Why should my kids miss the movies just so you can live?
I'd rather take my kids to the movies then pay for some queers healthcare. Why should my kids miss the movies just so you can live? You're not paying for my healthcare, dipshit.
Obama is forcing us to pay for queers. Why should I have to subsidize that. The money would be better spent taking my kids to the movies or out for a big mac and some french fries and a large coke. I'm just talking personal responsibility. I mean if you want to stick it in shit you might catch something. You know that.
I don't want anyone to get sick with anything. But if you do and you were risky it is your fault not mine.
I don't want anyone to get sick with anything. But if you do and you were risky it is your fault not mine. I don't do anything risky and I'm not sick. Not all gays have aids. You're not so ignorant that you believe that are you? And this has nothing to do with gay marriage.
You might want to read up on Agenda 21, edjamacate yourself....
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
If you're referring to Prop 8 in CA, the court ruled that law unconstitutional. Laws that are deemed unconstitutional cannot exist, even if voted on by the people. Your definition of the word "unconstitutional" seems to be different than just about everybody elses definition of the word "unconstitutional".... (This list also seems to be longer than the last time I looked at it just a few years ago). For instance.... Thirty states have a constitutional ban restricting marriage to one man and one woman. Those states are: •Alabama Alaska •Arizona •Arkansas •California (BTW this isn't over yet it's being reviewed and might go back into effect). •Colorado •Florida •Georgia •Kansas •Kentucky •Idaho •Louisiana •Michigan •Mississippi •Missouri •Montana •Nebraska •Nevada •North Carolina •North Dakota •Ohio •Oklahoma •Oregon •South Carolina •South Dakota •Tennessee •Texas •Utah •Virginia •Wisconsin The following states have laws that ban gay marriage and limit marriage to one man and one woman (but it is not in their constitutions): •Arizona •Delaware •Florida •Hawaii •Illinois •Indiana •Iowa •Maine •Maryland •Minnesota •North Carolina •Pennsylvania •Washington •West Virginia •Wyoming BTW the only reason gay marriage is even being considered in the first place is because the Dems want more permanent members of their voting plantation!! (You're being used and you don't even realize it)... So endeth today's "reality" lesson!!
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
While the GOP uses its alleged opposition to it and abortion to keep you on its plantation. The Supreme Court will rule on it next summer. We shall see.
The Supreme Court will rule on it next summer. We shall see. How can I be on "The GOP Plantation" when I don't vote for them in the first place?? I'm not against abortion, it helps keep the Leftard population in check!! Fewer Leftards = Fewer Taxes I have to pay...
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
South Dakota is the place to be.
I'm not against abortion, it helps keep the Leftard population in check!! Fewer Leftards = Fewer Taxes I have to pay... What's funny is that it's us Leftards that keep you right-wing degenerates afloat. Without us, you'd be living in a third world cesspool.
Comments (41 - 65) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest“Harassment and bullying are serious problems in our schools, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students are the targets of disproportionate shares of these problems,” the letter sent by Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated.
#2. To: hondo68 (#0)
In addition to DOE and the homosexual advocacy group, an atheist organization based in Wisconsin, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, has involved itself in the case. The organization emailed the school district’s superintendent and claimed Vanzandt “bullied” students and “preached” his belief that homosexuality is wrong to them.
#3. To: CZ82 (#1)
Harassment and bullying are serious problems in our schools, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students are the targets of disproportionate shares of these problems,” the letter sent by Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated.
#4. To: redleghunter (#2)
t was never about tolerance, equal rights and 'gettin along.' It has always been about controlling information, indoctrination and silencing opposing views.
#5. To: meguro (#4)
I love how you homophobic Bible thumpers try to twist things to suit your agenda.
#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)
Have you ever read the Bible?
#7. To: meguro (#6)
Have you ever read the Bible?
#8. To: redleghunter (#3)
It is about controlling the narrative. If you continue to threaten pubic institutions (private ones too) by suing them, they hope to silence opposing views.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#7)
Consider this meguro. What if it is the word of God? Shouldn't you read it just in case? Or at least part of it?
#10. To: meguro (#4)
love how you homophobic Bible thumpers try to twist things to suit your agenda.
#11. To: CZ82 (#8)
Silencing morality!!
#12. To: redleghunter (#10)
But it was not good enough for your lobby so they had to add a 'marriage' clause to the updated Oregon bill.
#13. To: meguro (#12)
What's wrong with adding a marriage clause? It IS a marriage. Separate but equal? I think not. We did away with Jim Crow laws years ago.
#14. To: redleghunter (#13)
(Edited)
You are doing the 'work' of the gay lobby in your statement. How? By using "Jim Crow" as a vehicle of argument to silence an opinion. Using the "hate" and "race" card is not an argument.
#15. To: mininggold (#11)
Naaah. It's about more regulation of people's private lives.
#16. To: redleghunter (#13)
You are doing the 'work' of the gay lobby in your statement. How? By using "Jim Crow" as a vehicle of argument to silence an opinion. Using the "hate" and "race" card is not an argument.
#17. To: meguro (#14)
But whatever it turns out to be, it is not marriage. You cannot change an absolute.
#18. To: CZ82 (#16)
Don't ya just love how they bring up Jim Crow laws to "try" and make their point... But then they turn right around and vote for those people who enacted those laws in the first place!!! LOL....
#19. To: redleghunter (#17)
I have never played a piano, or conducted but I want to be called a Maestro. That is your argument. Please don't lead me to having to explain the biology here.
#20. To: meguro (#19)
Open your eyes and smell the coffee, Maestro.
#21. To: mininggold (#18)
Heh it's works as good as that anti-semetism accusation you guys always throw around and is actually based on historical fact.
#22. To: meguro (#19)
Gay marriage already exists in certain US states. Don't you right-wingers believe in states rights?
#23. To: redleghunter (#20)
Do I have to explain the details of consummation of marriage and the purpose of producing legally recognized descendants?
#24. To: redleghunter (#20)
(Edited)
Marriage is not just a legal contract that allows you benefits and legal rights.
#25. To: CZ82 (#22)
(Edited)
Then why are the courts trying to force gay marriage on states that don't want it and their citizens have voted aginst it???
#26. To: meguro (#25)
What gives you the right to tell others who they can or cannot marry?
#27. To: A K A Stone (#26)
(Edited)
#28. To: meguro (#27)
Why do I have to live on the same planet as a wacko dipshit like you?
#29. To: A K A Stone (#28)
You don't. I hear a lot of you queers suicide out.
#30. To: meguro (#29)
#31. To: A K A Stone (#30)
#32. To: meguro (#31)
#33. To: meguro (#31)
#34. To: A K A Stone (#33)
#35. To: meguro (#25)
What if the citizens of your state don't want you to live there, and they vote to have you move. Should you be forced to move?
#36. To: meguro (#25)
What gives you the right to tell others who they can or cannot marry?
#37. To: CZ82 (#36)
BTW the only reason gay marriage is even being considered in the first place is because the Dems want more permanent members of their voting plantation!! (You're being used and you don't even realize it)...
#38. To: meguro (#37)
While the GOP uses its alleged opposition to it and abortion to keep you on its plantation.
#39. To: CZ82 (#36)
#40. To: CZ82 (#38)
How can I be on "The GOP Plantation" when I don't vote for them in the first place??
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]