Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-7 (More Aspartame serial poisoning, First two time Bite recipient "Fr." Peter Hans Kolvenbach and the Jesuit Order, BBC and 9-11 truth.)
Source:
00-Hotherp Reports
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 19, 2007
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2007-02-19 20:19:00 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Aspartame, 24Kolvenbach, 9-11, Illegal Immigration, Credit Cards, BBC
Views: 396
Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-7 (More Aspartame serial poisoning, First two time Bite recipient "Fr." Peter Hans Kolvenbach and the Jesuit Order, BBC and 9-11 truth.) For those of you who are used to seeing the Bites on Sundday night they were delayed this week on account ofillness. This week the bites will do something it has never done before. That is to issue two bites to the same person for involvement in to different actions. This person is "Fr." Peter Hans Kolvenbach, Superior General of the Jesuit Order of the Roman Church. These events for which he is receiving bites are the Jesuit involvement in 9-11 and the subsequent coverup and his pet California bank the Bank of America issuing credit cards to ILLEGAL ALIENS in the continuing effort of the Vatican to enforce the 500 year old bull of Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia) through illegal immigration. Also this week the Aspartame serial poisoners win again in New Mexico and the BBC joins Dennis Kucinich in the Peter Hans Kolvenbach 9-11 truth HIT Parade. As always Remember the KEY and enjoy. The New Mexico State Legislature again gets the bite and white Persian cats for killing this year's attempt to ban Aspartame in that state. Here is the report from the http://rense.com website. {[NEW MEXICO SENATE BILL 498, to ban Aspartame, the artificial sweetener, was killed on Sunday February 11, about 9:30 PM, by the Senate Public Affairs Committee, voting the way the 11 corporate lobbyists hammered them to do so, by a vote of 6-2. The House Consumer committee killed the House equivalent two days later 4-2. The motion to kill, or "table," was made by Senator Dr. Steve Komadina, OB- GYN, the only physician in the New Mexico Legislature, who, curiously enough, strongly recommends to his pregnant patients, that they never ever use Aspartame, for fear for the obvious harm the formaldehyde and methanol it metabolizes into, will do to the unborn fetus. Why he could not extend his "compassionate concern" and medical expertise to protect the 1.8 million citizens of New Mexico, and the 70% of the population that use Aspartame, and the 40% of the children, is far beyond me. I am so very much reminded of the lemmings all agreeing to jump off the cliff together. Perhaps any 8 of them, after consulting with the same corporate lobbyists, would be able to put together the same 6-2 majority. Gradually, the legislators who drink aspartame beverages will drop out (or drop dead) by attrition, after their intellectual faculties wane, yet are still in charge and entrusted with serious decisions and allocating billions of dollars. Some have already dropped out. The largest consumer of Aspartame in the Senate, the former Finance Chairman, actually resigned just before this legislative session! His successor, David Ulibarri, said it was because he just got old, and I asked, "What could make you older faster than the formaldehyde and methanol in 12 cans of Diet soda every day?"] [Dr. Komadina is likely destined for a brilliant future as physician- legislator to extend his sophistries in the name of Republican Libertarianism, since the corporations who make and distribute aspartame are now so happy with his "legislative efforts," maybe even enough to run his name up the flag pole as a possible candidate for Governor i 2010. On the surface, especially to those who still like the still brilliant Howard Dean, M.D., that might sound great to some: a physician as Governor, eh? Heal the sick, raise the dead, keep Big Pharma in business, a real "expert" who has delivered so many babies, as the Chief Executive of New Mexico?] [Eventually, both all of the manufacturing mega corporations and the American fast food corporations will have a perfectly docile and compliant citizenry, thanks to the likes of all of the Dr. Komadina's in so many legislatures, and despite the Uniformity of Food Regulations Bill failing in the United States Senate. The Japanese corporation, Ajinomoto, which lobbied so hard to kill the Aspartame bill, is the world's largest manufacturer of both Aspartame and the other neurotoxic and carcinogenic food additive, Monosodium Glutamate. Their lobbyist, Richard Minzner, spoke vehemently in favor of corporate theories of "federal pre-emption" by FDA pronouncements that Aspartame must still be "safe." But if that specious logic were true out in the rest of America in the real world, we'd still have asbestos, leaded gasoline, Thalidomide, and DDT; Eliot Spitzer would never have sued large pharmaceutical companies; we would might be using Agent Orange to defoliate America; New York City and Philadelphia would never have been able to ban transfats, and California would never have considered putting carcinogen labels on French fries, due to acrylamides. The fast food companies in California used the defense that the FDA never required such labels. New Mexico seems to like to capitulate to corporate theories of FDA pronouncements having the preemptive powers of Federal Laws, two entirely different things. Monsanto is out of the Aspartame business now, and so is G.D. Searle, the corporation that originally patented it in 1966. FDA turned down approval until 1981, based on the obvious and rudimentary chemistry and the metabolized compounds that result from its being digested: methanol, formaldehyde, and diketopiperazine (the last is a particularly nasty cause of brain tumors). So is Holland Sweeteners, I think partially due to my letters in Dutch to the Queen of the Netherlands, Her Majesty, Beatrix. Donald Rumsfeld is out of the Aspartame business and also out of the Defense Department business, as well, "gone but not forgotten," but the neurodegenerative harm done by his profitable regulatory coup in 1981 to force aspartame's approval will be around for many generations. Things look pretty grim for Consumer Protection efforts in New Mexico and in the USA in general at this moment. I had much higher hopes for New Mexico's new Attorney General, Gary King, Ph.D. Chemistry. I still hope that King will see the similarities between Big Tobacco and Big Aspartame enough to sue those corporations, but that honor will more likely befall a proven champion of Consumer Protection, perhaps Governor Eliot Spitzer, California's Attorney General Bill Lockyer, after his french fries warning about cancer prove to save lives in California.] [Perhaps efforts to ban Aspartame in Indonesia, South Africa, and other nations may ultimately vindicate ours in New Mexico. Perhaps not, even if other nations get to such obvious medical imperatives before the USA, since corporate America has constructed a very thick skin to externally or internally shield public consciousness in the USA from such embarrassing questions as product liability, neurodegenerative harm and illnesses resulting from their products, and other irksome inconveniences.]} You can read the complete http://rense.com article here: http://www.rense.com/general75/protection.htm As you know for the past two weeks the bites have been featuring Congressman Dennis Kucinich rather prominently for his turning his back on the 9-11 truth movement, one of the constituencies that helped him keep his house seat. Well this week the real source of that turncoating has been discovered, "Father" Peter Hans Kolvenbach and his Jesuit Order, DUUUHHH!!!!. Here are some highlights in a report http://arcticbeacon.com's Greg Szymanski dealing with the Jesuit Order, the Vatican and 9-11: {[Who Really Controls The 9/11 Truth Conferences And Are Americans Really Getting The Full Story? Speculation abounds about who really caused 9/11, but why is the Vatican/Jesuit connection conveniently left out of the debate in big conferences like Chicago and the upcoming one this month in Arizona? 14 Feb 2007 By Greg Szymanski The Arctic Beacon, as well as other credible truth outlets, have compiled sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the government story about 9/11 is bogus and that a cover-up exists to keep the true cause of the mass murder from the American people. Hard evidence complied in the last five years, however, has never been properly addressed by the 9/11 Commission and has never been brought before a proper court of law or even a Grand Jury. Furthermore, the debate about 9/11 truth still remains in the court of public opinion, as the 9/11 truth movement, which goes from city to city every few months with a large conference, has been unfortunately infiltrated by numerous pysops agents working for the Vatican-led New World Order. The intention of these agents is to control the 9/11 debate as well as steer information from the true culprits. What this means is that a "lot of hot air" is blown around at these so-called truth conferences, but very little progress is made at getting at the real perpetrators.] [For example, the Arctic Beacon was the first outlet to question the intentions of Professor Steven Jones when he first went public since his affiliation with Brigham Young University needed to be scrutinized. In fact, Professor Jones made his first radio appearance on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, when he first went public, Jones having free reign to state his 9/11 concerns without hard questioning. In that interview, he stated the last thing he wanted to do was go public, saying he wanted to remain in the quiet confines of the BYU educational setting. But in retrospect there is no one in the so-called 9/11 truth circuit that has gone more public then Jones, speaking at numerous universities around the country as well as publicly joining 9/11 Scholars for Truth until recently leaving the organization in a flurry of controversy with the original founder, Professor James Fetzer of Minnesota. Further, it appears Jones' connection with the Scholars for Truth created more disarray, confusion and controversy then good, a characteristic usually associated with planted infiltrators and pysops agents. Looking back, the Arctic Beacon made this observation about Jones after he went "totally public" but later backed off from these accusations, giving him the benefit of the doubt in a spirit of unity and accountability. However, his role in 9/11 must again be examined due to the fruits of his work, not only on the physics of 9/11, but with his track record of being a part of the internal havoc in the Scholars for Truth. Not only should his BYU connection be examined since the LDS Church is a breeding ground for Vatican-led New World Order minions, but the hierarchy of the Mormon Church needs to be fully examined since it can be proved that it has been established and has been in total control from the beginning by the Vatican and Jesuit Order, who just happen to be the real spiritual controllers of the New World Order, according to many researchers. Although it is hard to nab the real infiltrators of the 9/11 movement, Jones should be asked some tough questions, as should others in the Scholars for Truth group since this group is just one of the groups trying to lead public opinion and debate about 9/11. Furthermore, it should be noted that in a court of law or in testimony before a citizens' Grand Jury, Jones is only a very small piece in solving the 9/11 puzzle, as his testimony would only be limited to an expert witness in regards to the free-fall nature of the Twin Towers, establishing that jet fuel was not the real reason the Towers fell while establishing that this element of the government story is untrue.] [The Arctic Beacon asks why researcher Rick Seigal is not speaking, as well as other researchers like Eric Jon Phelps, who could present an interesting case on who really caused 9/11? It should be noted that it is also time to stray away from the hard evidence establishing a 9/11 cover-up warranting a new investigation, but serious debate should also begin about who are the real perpetrators of 9/11. For example, in the past speculation has been pointed at the Bush administration, the Zionists/Mossad, the Illuminati elite and banksters and the Muslim terrorists. However, conveniently left out of the debate in large 9/11 Conferences around the country, including Chicago and the upcoming Arizona conference, is the fact that the Vatican and Jesuit Order may have had a big hand in the planning of 9/11 as a way to begin the Pope's final 'Crusade of Extermination' against Christians, Muslims and Jews. If we are only in the speculation stage of getting at the true 9/11 culprits after five long years, then the question must be asked why have the so-called experts and 9/11 truth seekers and speakers in these conferences never bothered to speculate about Vatican involvement. What are they afraid of? What are they hiding? And is the bad side or the good side really controlling the public debate about 9/11. For example, recently a former high-level Illuminati member of the Monte Carlo P2 Lodge, Leo Zagami, who defected 4 months ago to tell the truth about Vatican and Jesuit involvement in the New World Order and destruction of America, presented inside information regarding some of the perpetrators of 9/11. Zagami stated he had personal knowledge that the Jesuit Order (Jesuit Gen. Fr. Pete Hans Kolvenbach), the Gladio intelligence pysops group, Licio Gelli (former Masonic P2 leader in Italy and good friend of Ronald Reagan, Commandant Giorgio Hugo Balestrieri (now the head of the New York Rotary Club) and former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani, as well as NY Cardinal Eagan, all had prior knowledge and were instrumental in planning and carrying out 9/11. Here is what Zagami recently said about Balestrieri: "Giorgio Hugo Balestrieri, ATTIVO 907 P2 LODGE, now a proud American citizen! "Check for yourself on the internet and you will be surprised to see one of the present New York Rotary Club Directors registered as a member of the infamous P2 Lodge, and if you bring your research a bit further you will also find is involvement with the illegal arms trade in the port of Livorno in the 70's!] ["Americans, wake-up! I know these people, including Gelli and others, were all involved in planning 9/11 because I heard it myself. This is what should be discussed in your 9/11 conferences, but I know they are sending agents controlled by the Vatican to keep this discussion off the table. And Zagami makes a good point. Why isn't the Vatican ever discussed in connection with being involved in causing 9/11? Why? Perhaps because someone is paying people to make sure the connection isn't made! Lastly, ask why at the end of the day when the Arizona conference is completed why Vatican speculation is left out? Better yet, ask why the "bigshots' of the 9/11 movement (and you know who they are) leave the Vatican story completely out of the picture? Ask these questions and someday the truth may be told and people like Donna Marsh-O'Conner, who lost her pregnant 24-year-old daughter running for her life out of the South Tower, may someday get justice by bringing the real 9/11perpetrators and mass murderers before the American people. For, without question, Marsh-O'Conner and others who lost their loved ones on that tragic day deserve better then what these 9/11 conferences have to offer, Further, family members who lost loved ones could care less what trail finally leads to the true perpetrators of 9/11 even if all roads finally lead to the doorstep of the Vatican and the White House.]} What it ammounts to like all other gun grabbing socialists no matter what brand name they use Communism, Marxism, Fascism, Nazism, Progressivism, Neo-Conservatism, Liberalism, Bolivarism and all the rest Kucinich is working for the Vatican and lying through his teeth for the "New World Order" that is actually nothing but the OLD "HOLY" ROMAN EMPIRE of the Dark Ages. You can read the complete http://arcticbeacon.com article here: http://www.rense.com/general75/protection.htm It may be very strange to see a bite for the same person twice but my latest info on the Jesuits requires it this time because the two subjects we're talking about here are different. This bite concerns the practice of the Bank of America giving credit cards to ILLEGAL ALIENS That was reported throughout both the MSM and the alternative media last week. Just GUESS who owns a 51% stake in the Bank of America dispite supposedly being under a "vow of poverty". If you said the Jesuit Order of the Roman Church than {{{{{(((((Ding! Ding! Ding!)))))}}}}} WE HAVE A WINNAH!!!!! This points even further to the general idea that the Jesuit Order in America is aiding and abetting in the enforcement of the 500 year Papal Bull of Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia, one of the most wicked men who ever lived) through the use of Illegal Immigration to bring about its New Dark Ages, OOPS, New World Order. It seems the BBC which until now has done a good job in reporting Shrubya's tendencies for imperialism and warmongering has joined Dennis Kucinich in the Peter Hans Kolvenbach Dump 9-11 Truth Parade. According to a report on http://prisonplanet.com: {[ Here comes a load of manure from the the BBC: We're all conspiracy theorists at heart Why are conspiracy theories so popular? We may not always believe what we're told, but we still can't resist listening to them. Guy Smith, producer of 9/11: The Conspiracy Files, suggests the answer may lie deep within us all. Did you catch that? It's deep within us all; i.e. it has nothing to do with whether the official stories purporting to explain these great national tragedies bear any relation to the physical evidence allegedly supporting those stories. Really. I'm sure that's all it is. And if you don't believe me, read Guy Smith: I admit it. If I'm being really honest, I can't deny that I'm a bit of a conspiracy theorist. Perhaps we all are. It's easy to dismiss all conspiracy theories as "bunkum", but remember just occasionally they do turn out to be true. Remember Watergate? Iran-contra? Special Branch collusion with loyalist terrorists in Northern Ireland? As Jim Fetzer, one of the leading 9/11 conspiracy theorists, says: "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you." Now watch this! It's the old fake-em-over-here and then run-over-there play. A counter-trap, in American football terms. He makes an opening nod to Fetzer, and claims to be a "conspiracy theorist" (whatever that means) and then goes in the other direction. I've just spent the best part of nine months investigating the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding the al-Qaeda attacks on 11 September, 2001. ... The deeper you dig in the dark world of conspiracies, the more you realise that different theories share much in common. The conspiracy theorist seizes on any apparent inconsistency and from that germ of truth the story is built up.] [ Ahem. From that germ of truth an investigation is started. What happened to the white car apparently involved in Diana's accident? Was there a second gunman on the Grassy Knoll? And why did it take so long to scramble US fighters on 9/11? All good questions, no? And we can't help but be fascinated by them. But why? Here's the place where Mr. Smith diverges from reality: Perhaps it's because deep down, we're all story tellers. It's one of the things that makes us who we are. Since the dawn of time, we've been creating heroes and monsters as a way of trying to make sense of the world. In the beginning, we told those tales round camp fires. Now, it's through internet chat rooms or on mobile phones. But it's still basically the same process - weaving stories out of real life. That's the mis-direction. I'm a conspiracy theorist, Iran Contra, blah blah blah, we're weaving stories out of real life. As a matter of fact, we are mostly asking questions about stories we were told by known serial liars which allegedly explain national and global tragedies but which in fact have virtually no relation to the physical evidence which allegedly supports these stories. And speaking of Iran-Contra, forgive me but aren't these the same guys? If Mr. Smith had spent nine months investigating the attacks of 9/11 with an open mind then he might have learned something truly useful, but as you can see from his introduction, he spent nine months investigating the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding the al-Qaeda attacks on 11 September, 2001 -- in other words he started out with the official conspiracy story in his head and spent the next nine months fleshing it out, in order to make a documentary for BBC which is going to amount to nothing more nor less than Popular Mechanics on skates. In this column, Guy Smith lays the groundwork for his work of massive fraud. He's about to become an accessory-after-the-fact in a case of mass murder on an unimaginable scale, which means he's obliged to descend into the world of absolute falsehood. He goes gently and elegantly, and he precedes his descent with admirable deception, but into the world of absolute falsehood he certainly does go. When something awful, inexplicable or just plain evil rocks our world, we have an instinctive need to construct elaborate explanations to try and make sense of our anxiety and fear. We have an instinctive need for an explanation that makes sense, but there's no need for the explanation to be elaborate. In fact, the simpler the explanation, the better.] [ In the JFK assassination, for instance, we were told on the very evening that the case had been solved: it was a communist, acting alone, who had done the deed, he'd been caught, no problem, and nothing to worry about. So the nation relaxed -- into an ocean of grief. It was easy to believe the one-lone-nut tale of Lee Harvey Oswald, because it was so simple. And it was only later that we started to find out that the official story was not only dubious but actually contradicted by the physical evidence. After that whenever something really bad happened, it got harder and harder to get the evidence. When Princess Diana was killed, we were told it was simply an auto accident -- well, who could do anything about that? Except grieve. And we did. And it was comforting to know there was a simple explanation. The world is complex enough, daily life is sufficiently taxing, people tend to buy the simplest possible explanation for virtually anything. Except when it doesn't make sense. And when it turned out that the car in which she died was sealed away and there was no public examination of any evidence to support the official story of that horrible event, it was natural for people to wonder whether what really happened and what we were told happened were one and the same. And the more they dug, the more they doubted. This didn't happen because people tend to gravitate toward awful and complex explanations when simple and comforting tales are available. It happened because -- again -- the simple and comforting tale was found wanting. And no matter how badly people wished to believe it, they couldn't. When 9/11 happened, it was the same thing all over again only bigger. Awesome waves of grief swept the world, and the story came out fast and simple. Nineteen hijackers armed with box cutters had hijacked four commercial airliners simultaneously and they all crashed. Two of them smashed into gigantic office towers and a third hit the most heavily fortified building on the planet. Neither the national capital nor the the business capital of the world had any appreciable air cover that day, and the two office buildings which were hit by planes burned for a little while and then disintegrated -- didn't fall apart but turned to powder!]} You can read the complete http://prisonplanet.com article here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/180207smearbegins.htm Here is another article dealing with the BBC and their new Kolvenbach take on 9-11 truth: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/180207smearcontinues.htm 
Bite One ---> New Mexico Legislature
Bite Two ---> "Fr." Peter Hans Kolvenbach
Bite Three ---> "Fr." Peter Hans Kolvenbach
Bite Four ---> The BBC
More next week.
(64 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]