The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: The Tera Party is A dead Horse, Time for am ORGANIZED Jury Nullification Movement!!!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 11, 2012
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2012-11-11 01:01:24 by Coral Snake
Keywords: JuryNullification, Organizatio, CovenentalActionCorps
Views: 19123
Comments: 5
The first post of the COVENANTAL ACTION CORPS It is time to take the next step beyond the ballot box. The ballot box electorate is too asleep and brainwashed to depend upon to preserve our freedoms and God given rights now. Neither can we depend on the SCOTUS anymore to preserve our God given rights because Owe-bama is sure to get the apointments neccessary to make a Marxist gun grabber majority on the court now. It is time for an ORGANIZED JURY NULLIFICATION MOVEMENT against "gun control" at ALL levels Federal State and Local, legal tender laws that continue to favor this current FARO RESERVE BANK debt-usury system of money creation, compulsory "education" (BRAINWASHING) laws, Owe-bamacare, perpetual copyrights that allow the giant "Progressive" media companies to use perpetual copyrighted "entertainment" libraries to suport their "news" (BRAINWASHING) divisions and all the rest of the TREWASONOUS and GENOCIDAL "Progressive" "laws" that have been passed in the last 100 years, ALL OF THEM!!! The Tea Party is a dead horse, time for the COVENANTAL ACTION CORPS!!!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#1. To: Coral Snake, *Bill of Rights-Constitution* (#0)
I've got some bad news for you... they're the jury pool. Add voir dire to the process, and chances of jury nullification are slim. The odds are long, but it's still a very worthwhile effort.
A minority of ONE on a jury can stop a conviction on any criminal case. Admittedly some copyright cases are civil in nature and require a simple majority vote and therefore may be a harder nut to crack but all copyright cases involving "piracy" are criminal in nature and require a unanimous vote for conviction. All cases involving "gun control", legal tender laws, anti business regulation violations, Owe-bamacare and the like are also criminal in nature and require a unanomous vote for conviction. Therefore a small minority can gain a monopoly over jury convictions under our current system of criminal law and use it against CRIMINAL copyright violations and all the other "laws" i mentioned here. (Since I do believe in copyright as the Founders designed it that being a maximum 28 year term I would restrict anti copyright Jury Nullification only to those items that have been under copyright for 29 years or longer).
The first duty of any jury, is to determine whether the law itself is just. Suppose the state passed a law, that it's a felony to walk down the sidewalk, eating a banana. The police arrest a man for doing this; they have video and witnesses to the 'crime.' The underlying problem is that the described action is no crime whatsoever, thus the jury MUST vote not guilty. Sadly, the vast majority of people who would serve on a jury, have no idea of this duty. Judges and prosecuting attorneys refuse to instruct jurists about this, even though (as I understand it) it was common knowledge until about 60- 70 years ago... People believe in the sanctity of the state, even when they know it lies. IMO, we're already beyond what the ballot-box or jury box can do. Only the ammo-box remains.
Good luck with that one. I was on trial for exercising my right to drive one of many times. I tried to tell the Jury that it was their right to decide the law. The judge called me back for a sidebar. I was representing myself. I told the Judge "But John Jay the first supreme court justice said it was the duty of the Jury to not only determine the facts of the case but if the law was valid. He told me I couldn't tell them that. So I went back to the Jury. I said this is a copy of the constitution. Then I ripped it in half. I then said I guess the constitution of the Unitd States of America isn't in affect in this court. I rested my case. Then I lost. I won other times representing myself.
John Jay the first supreme court justice said it was the duty of the Jury to not only determine the facts of the case but if the law was valid. He told me I couldn't tell them that. Your point is well-taken. I told my boss (who happens to be a retired sherrif) that I would never be picked to be on a jury, for this very reason, and he laughed... But I'll never vote guilty for someone accused of drug or weapons charges, nor will I simply swallow whatever they say is a "just" law. If I decide the law is not valid, there's nothing they can say or do to make me vote for anything other than "not guilty."
There are no replies to Comment # 5. End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe ballot box electorate is too asleep and brainwashed to depend upon to preserve our freedoms and God given rights now
#2. To: hondo68 (#1)
#3. To: Coral Snake (#2)
#4. To: Capitalist Eric (#3)
The first duty of any jury, is to determine whether the law itself is just.
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
Capitalist Eric: The first duty of any jury, is to determine whether the law itself is just.
Stone: Good luck with that one....
Replies to Comment # 5.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]