Title: Boehner Extends Olive Branch on 'Fiscal Cliff' (tax increases) Source:
CNBC URL Source:http://www.cnbc.com/id/49731550 Published:Nov 7, 2012 Author:Reuters Post Date:2012-11-07 17:54:49 by Hondo68 Ping List:*The Two Parties ARE the Same*Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same* Keywords:want you to lead, a balanced approach, will include higher taxes Views:98210 Comments:133
House Speaker John Boehner offered Wednesday to pursue a deal with a victorious President Barack Obama that will include higher taxes "under the right conditions" to help reduce the nation's staggering debt and put its finances in order.
Getty Images
Speaker of the House John Boehner
"Mr. President, this is your moment," Boehner told reporters, speaking about the "fiscal cliff" that will hit in January. "We want you to lead."
Boehner said House Republicans are asking Obama "to make good on a balanced approach" that would including spending cuts and address government social benefit programs.
"Let's find the common ground that has eluded us," Boehner said while congratulating the president on winning a second term. (Read more: Obama Re-elected as Crucial Ohio Goes His Way.)
The Ohio Republican spoke a day after the president's clear re-election victory. He said conditions on higher taxes would include a revamped tax code to make it cleaner and fairer, fewer loopholes and lower rates for all.
The speaker noted that during one-on-one budget talks with the president in the summer of 2011, Obama had "endorsed the idea of tax reform and lower rates, including a top rate of lower than 35 percent," the present top rate.
Boehner did not specify what loopholes House Republicans might consider trimming. Nor did he take questions.
His comments were generally along the lines of proposals by vanquished Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney that also were vague on specifics. Still, the speaker's comments signaled a willingness to enter into talks. He suggested Congress could use its upcoming lame-duck session to get the ball moving on such a compromise.
"We can't solve the problem of our fiscal imbalance overnight...This is going to take time," he said.
Poster Comment:
He's ready to be lead to Obama's lame duck a$$, so he can kiss it.
Boehner Extends Olive Branch on 'Fiscal Cliff' (tax increases)
It won't be that bad....
America is still the Vaunted Global Military power. So there will certainly be many more wars....lots of parades. Who knows...maybe they finally do another great movie like the San Pebbles or Saving Private Ryan.
Buck up America....its not even anywhere's scarry like 1/3 rd of the Earth burned with fire...1/3 of the water poisoned....and the Beast image in Jerusalem. Hey...it will be at least 10 years before things get that bad : )
America is still the Vaunted Global Military power. So there will certainly be many more wars....lots of parades.
Yeah,but you know what? One day the money won't be there for us to fight to protect Saudi Arabia in the Muddle East,and all those soldiers will be coming back home and looking for jobs that just aren't there.
us to fight to protect Saudi Arabia in the Muddle East
LOL!!!
We all know who we are 'protecting' in the ME and it sure as the hell isn't SA.
I.E.: Israel To U.S.: Don't Delay Iraq Attack
Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq's Saddam Hussein, an aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday.
Israeli intelligence officials have gathered evidence that Iraq is speeding up efforts to produce biological and chemical weapons, said Sharon aide Ranaan Gissin.
"Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose," Gissin said. "It will only give him (Saddam) more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction."
We all know who we are 'protecting' in the ME and it sure as the hell isn't SA.
Yes,it IS Saudi Arabia.
Your hatred for Jews is blinding you to reality. The Jews are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves against their Muslim neighbors. It's SA that needs the protection of the US military.
You are being dishonest or your memory isn't that good.
Seriously, you've gone off the deep end, much as goldi, the Israel-firster fat- bitch, has...
You're making up shit about other people, that should be easy to substantiate (IF they were true), and then look like a complete loon because they're not.
You then act as though you're the ONLY honest person on the forum, when it's obvious that you're the biggest liar here... And yet you have the balls to claim you're a "Christian," and honest, and all that...
If your purpose is to drive everyone off your forum, so they don't have to tolerate your blatant hypocrisy, you're doing a damn fine job of it...
Whatever.
I don't know what your game is, but it's clear that you've lost your moral compass, and any semblance of credibility with regard to much of anything.
Whatever.
I was impressed with your "Galt" article this morning... thought, 'hey, that's COOL, I like it.' But tonight, your emotions have taken over, and your behavior is borderline 'hysterical.'
In real life, I'm not known as one to sugar-coat the truth, because I've neither the time nor patience for emotional sugar-coating of facts... And I'm used to dealing with the consequences of this approach. So if telling you the truth is what gets me booted from here, than I fine with that. At the end of the day, you'll be rimjob-jr., echo-chamber and all. Pfft.
I was impressed with your "Galt" article this morning... thought, 'hey, that's COOL,
Thank You.
You misunderstand me. I like things to be accurate. You guys called Romney a communist. He isn't. That is ludicrous. He is a very successful Capitalist. I voted for Romney because he offered my kids a better future with less debt then Obama. You can whine like a broken record that they are the same all you want. But it isn't true. I like accuracy. They may be similar on some things but certainly not all things. Great differences on lots of things. You know that and I know that. So it is you who is lying when you say they are the same. If you want to be honest you should say they are to much alike or something like that.
You guys called Romney a communist. He isn't. That is ludicrous. He is a very successful Capitalist.
LOL. What complete shit.
He's a CORPORATIST. Lenin, Hitler or Mussolini... yeah, there were minor differences between them... They were communist, socialist or fascist, respectively.
I like accuracy. They may be similar on some things but certainly not all things.
Yeah, they were.... like.... black and white, on certain aspects....
Oh, WAIT....
LMAO.
So it is you who is lying when you say they are the same. If you want to be honest you should say they are to much alike or something like that.
Hmmm... if you like accuracy as much as you say, than you should be able to find at least one post I made, where I said they were exactly the same on every issue...
Can you DO it??? NO.
Because I have constantly said they were the same in every way that matters.
I, TOO, believe in accuracy.
And I believe that I've caught you in yet another lie...
Not that that's much of a challenge these days, mind you....