[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Election Predictions
Source: Dissenting Opinions
URL Source: http://jwpegler.blogspot.com/2012/11/election-predictions.html
Published: Nov 3, 2012
Author: jwpegler
Post Date: 2012-11-03 19:26:29 by jwpegler
Keywords: None
Views: 40151
Comments: 65

We are three days away from one of the two most consequential elections in my lifetime (along with 1980).

So, it's time to go out on a limb and make my predictions for what is likely going to happen.

Presidency

Mitt Romney will be elected the next President of the United States.

No President since Franklin Roosevelt has won reelection with the unemployment rate above 7.2%. No President ever has won reelection with a smaller share of the vote than he got when originally elected to the Presidency... and no one anywhere argues that Obama will get more than the 52.9% of the vote he got in 2008.

The country has been in a sour mood for about four years now. Obama will pay the price, just like McCain did in 2008. They will have both paid the price for denying that the country is in dire economic straights. The big difference between McCain and Obama is that Obama is in charge of the country's troubles.

Yes, there are a couple of polls (Quinnipiac and Marist) that show Obama with a substantial lead. However, those polls have unrealistic turnout models. They are both projecting Democrat turnout at or above the record 2008 levels, when people who have never voted before, and may never vote again, turned out to elect America's first black President. We are not going to see an 8 point Democrat advantage in turnout this year. Averaging the 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010 turnouts gives the GOP a 1% advantage in turnout. This would turn Obama's 5% lead in the Quinnipiac poll into a 4% Romney lead. In addition, in every poll, Romney is leading among independent voters.

Romney will get somewhere between 271 and 331 votes. I have a bunch of very realistic models that predict this range. It will definitely not be a landslide like Nixon or Reagan. But unseating a sitting President will be enough to give him the mandate he needs to get the economy back on track.

There is a small chance that Romney will win the popular vote, but Obama will win the electoral vote. This is an increasingly popular fantasy with the mainstream media, who are desperate to see Obama re-elected. This scenario had some credibility 2 to 3 weeks ago. But probably no longer.

House

Republicans will retain control of the House. There is no question about this at all.

The GOP could lose up to 5 seats. If Romney wins, they could gain up to 5 seats.

Given their advantage with the last redistricting, the GOP should easily pick up 20 to 25 seats.

They won't.

It demonstrates how incompetent the House GOP "leadership" really is.

Senate

The Senate should have been a blowout in favor of the GOP this year. There are twice as many Democrat seats up for grabs than Republican seats, and the country is in a sour mood. Unfortunately, like 2010, the GOP nominated many of the wrong people.

In 2010, the GOP nominated and won with great people like Rand Paul. However, they also got their ass kicked with the witch from Delaware and the religious kook from Nevada.

If the various Tea Parties want to have a sustained positive influence on the country, they need to be able to distinguish between GREAT reformers like Rand Paul and self-serving kooks like Christine O'Donnell.

This year, the GOP could have easily won Senate races in Indiana and Missouri. Yet, the are struggling because the GOP candidates in both states made idiotic comments about rape. It's a message to the Tea Parties -- not to be more "moderate", but to be more discerning (selective) about the people they support.

The Senate will be tight -- a small Democrat majority is very likely, but a small Republican majority is still possible, in spite of the GOP's idiocy.

My prediction is that the Democrats will barely retain control.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

#6. To: jwpegler (#0)

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Nate Silver's record speaks for itself.

Jameson  posted on  2012-11-04   6:22:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jameson (#6) (Edited)

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Nate Silver's record speaks for itself.

Yes it does.

In 2010, he projected the GOP would pick up 54 seats in the House. They picked up 63 seats - - a whopping 17% difference.

In 2010, there were only 4 close Senate races (Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Alaska). Silver got 3 of the 4 (75%) wrong. For example, Silver predicted that Sharron Angle was going to win Nevada by 3 points. Harry Reid won by 5.5% - - that's a huge 8.5% difference.

This year, he gave Santorum an 18% chance of winning the Iowa Caucus and Romney a 44% of winning. Santorum basically tied Romney with 25% of the vote.

Silver is NOT infallible. He is going to be wrong again this year.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-11-04   14:04:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: jwpegler (#12)

Silver is NOT infallible.

indeed.

Consider

Nate Silver's 2010 track record: He correctly predicted 34/36 Senate seats whose outcomes were resolved by November 4, 2010 He predicted a net gain of 54 seats in the House for Republicans (the House actually gained 63 Republicans) Nate correctly predicted the outcome in 36 of 37 gubernatorial elections

Importantly, even the elections that Nate got wrong were with in his published margins of error -- i.e., the candidate was projected to get 50.5% of the vote +/- 1.5%, but got 49.5%; it's technically 'wrong' (wrong candidate won), but still a very good prediction. Really, the best measure of Silver's accuracy would be to compare how often reality fell within his margin of error bars; better yet, how often reality fell within his error margins compared to others.

http://www.quora.com/Nate-Silver/How-many-House-Senate-and-Governor-races-did- the-NYTs-Nate-Silver-correctly-predict-winners-for-versus-other-well-kno

Jameson  posted on  2012-11-04   19:32:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Jameson (#14) (Edited)

He correctly predicted 34/36 Senate seats

WOW. We really needed a guru to predict that Barbara Boxer was going to win yet again... What great insight he provided!

In the 4 Senate races that were competitive in 2010, Silver was wrong 3 times -- a whopping 75% failure rate.

He got the Nevada race wrong by 8.5 points -- he said Sharon Angel would win by 3 points and she lost by 5.5 points. Yep, what a "guru" he really is.

Silver has a blog in the New York Times, as does the economic "guru" Paul Krugman, whose head is stuck in the 1930s. They are both cracked.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-11-05   17:43:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: jwpegler (#18)

Silver has a blog in the New York Times, as does the economic "guru" Paul Krugman, whose head is stuck in the 1930s. They are both cracked.

He seems smarter than you.

meguro  posted on  2012-11-07   8:59:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: meguro (#36)

Silver has a blog in the New York Times, as does the economic "guru" Paul Krugman, whose head is stuck in the 1930s. They are both cracked.

He seems smarter than you.

I don't do this for a living. He does.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-11-07   10:17:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: jwpegler, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#37)

I don't do this for a living.

An amateur k00k, but still a k00k!

Hondo68  posted on  2012-11-07   10:21:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: hondo68 (#38) (Edited)

An amateur k00k, but still a k00k!

You didn't even play. You just sat their and masturbated over Ron Paul.

Like the rest of, you'll now pay the price with a socialist healthcare system, a decimated energy industry, at least $21 trillion in debt, and so many people on the government dole that we'll never be able to turn the country around.

OH, I did get one more prediction right -- Gary Johnson and Virgil Goode COMBINED did not get 1% of the vote.

Nice job, asshole.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-11-07   10:30:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: jwpegler, hondo68 (#40)

Like the rest of, you'll now pay the price with a socialist healthcare system, a decimated energy industry, at least $21 trillion in debt, and so many people on the government dole that we'll never be able to turn the country around.

And now you'll blame conservatives instead of the RNC and idiotic sheep like yourself.

Some of us predicted that too.

We The People  posted on  2012-11-07   21:02:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: We The People (#53) (Edited)

Like my new tagline?

;)

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-11-08   0:09:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 55.

#56. To: Capitalist Eric (#55) (Edited)

Very much! Looks a lot like revolutionary war percentages

We The People  posted on  2012-11-09 17:39:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com