Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles
Title: It's Not Over! (will bam go quietly after defeat?)
Source:
american thinker
URL Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/its_not_over.html
Published: Oct 31, 2012
Author: William L. Gensert
Post Date: 2012-10-31 12:12:44 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 8332
Comments: 18
Does anyone believe that when Barack Obama loses on November 6, he will go quietly? This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it. The nation should be preparing for how he might react when it happens -- there is nothing more dangerous than a cornered god. In 2008, Americans wholeheartedly bought the Obama dream. It's never easy to let go of a dream, but today, people have let go of Obama the dream -- and on November 6, they will let go of Obama the man. The debates served two purposes -- namely, showing the world that Mitt Romney was not the evil mastermind Obama and his crew had spent hundreds of millions of dollars portraying him to be while erasing the myth of Obama as invincible and inevitable. For a man who is supposedly brilliant, it was devastating to see him perform like an uninformed moron in Denver. It can be said that he was unprepared, but whose fault was that? Preparation was too much of a "drag," and he wanted to see the Hoover Dam -- a particular draw for him, since it has always been a dream of Barack the god to build an Obama Dam while Americans forced to live in the economy he has built scream "God damn Obama." The last two debates showed that the president did not understand what was going on. He thought he needed to be more aggressive, but all America saw was a rude and obnoxious man, with a dismal record of governance and no plan for the future. It used to be said that he is likable, but his condescension and constant belittling of Mitt Romney dispelled that notion. He spent millions of dollars and much of the past year trying to define Mitt Romney and was outraged when his carefully concocted caricature didn't show up. Most people saw a man who was reasonable and presidential. A nation shell-shocked by four years of failed leadership saw the next president of the United States. Barack thought he was a guaranteed victor in his re-election campaign. He thought the aura of his presence would so cow Romney into submission that when all was said and done, he would have the governor promising to vote for him as well. Since his election, however, Obama has always been destined to lose -- America simply does not want what he is selling. But after his performance in the debates, many who had been inclined to perhaps give him a second chance took another look and didn't like what they saw: a nasty, petulant, thin-skinned man, uninformed and without a plan to move forward -- and all this on top of his disastrous record. Yet he will not go away. In the best-case scenario, on November 7, Obama begins his march toward 2016. His entire life has been an exercise in running for president. Yet, paradoxically, when he attained the exalted position he so coveted, he acted as if it was a burden, and that we Americans did not deserve him -- in the end, only playing at being president while thoroughly enjoying the plane, the parties, and the perks. He may never have been more than a part-time president, but to expect him to give up the job easily or gracefully is to fall prey to wishful thinking. His monstrous ego will not allow any other course of action but to fight. But, after his loss in two weeks, he will be forever destroyed as a viable option, at least electorally -- the cloak of invincibility and transcendent brilliance having succumbed to the reality of the man. He will become a mere mortal -- the veneer of likability stripped away by the truth of his pettiness and anger. In short, he will never again be able to win the presidency at the ballot box. And therein lies the danger. If Obama knows he can't win in 2016, he just might claim election fraud and attempt to stay. In a way, this could be what Attorney General Eric Holder's war on voter ID is all about -- establishing an argument for overturning supposedly fraudulent results. If his claim is validated by sycophantic media minions, it could gain traction among the electorate. It certainly will be believed by his small cadre of ardent supporters. After that, there is no telling what he might do -- or what his followers might do. I would like to believe that Obama will exit gracefully. And I have a hard time accepting that he or his cohorts will foment rioting in the streets -- despite threats tweeted by twits on Twitter -- or that he will impose martial law. But, if I learned anything during decades in business, it is that proper preparation is paramount -- no one can know for sure what the future holds. The prudent prepare for all eventualities. After all, we don't really know Barack Obama. His history is a chimera. The only information we have on the man is what he has told us in his two biographies and the slightly less than fpur years we have watched his disastrous reign of incompetence. Just look at his recent actions. He has no problem ignoring the First Amendment and throwing a YouTube videographer in prison to sustain his pretend version of events surrounding the assassination of our ambassador in Benghazi. He has no qualms falsely touting a little-watched video as the reason for Islamic unrest -- even to the point of causing riots at dozens of American embassies worldwide. Those with open eyes know what this president is capable of. Is this a man we can trust to accept the verdict of the electorate? I would like to believe yes, but all the evidence points to no. It never occurred to Obama that he would not win a second term. He saw Mitt Romney as a mere businessman, and we know what Obama thinks of businessmen. He had dealt with many in the past -- they were greedy and easily converted into crony capitalists by government cash and preferential treatment. Hubris is the most dangerous of emotions -- and Obama views all around him as extensions of himself. When he looks into the eyes of Americans, all he sees is his own reflection. He has surrounded himself with those who tell him only what he wants to hear. He lives in a bubble, but it is a bubble of his own creation, and because of that, he can't see it as a bubble. He sees it as reality. What happens when the bubble bursts? When reality ensues on November 7 -- who knows how he will react? Being a god is great as long as people believe, but once they do not, you become a mere mortal. Will Obama accept that? Once the curtain was pulled back, the Wizard of Oz was forevermore just a man. For Barack, the yellow brick road leads out of the White House. And, having spent the last half-decade studying the man, I'm not convinced that he will willingly follow that path. I want to believe he will. But I am not so sure. Barack Obama will lose this election in a landslide, but that will almost certainly not be the end of it. Voting is more important now than ever for those who wish to preserve the union -- the larger the landslide and the bigger his margin of loss, the harder it will be for Barack Obama to pretend the nation still wants him Read more: www.americanthinker.com/2...t_over.html#ixzz2AtTKxEuB
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: calcon (#0)
What happens when the bubble bursts? commander in witch doctor !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Nope, he'll have a whole army of lawyers out there trying to prove the election was stolen thru voter fraud... And they'll be using all of those "fake" polls that have shown Obozo to be in the lead when he actually hasn't been!!!
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
a whole army of lawyers out there trying to prove the election was stolen thru voter fraud... Another recount Christmas? But there's a "wise latina" and some other dyke on the SCOTUS now, in addition to Ginsing! She's supposed to die of cancer, but is hanging on to save Obongo.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
You know damn well they will drag it out as long as they can until they can magically "find some votes that were missed before"!! Rules for Leftards #55). When all else fails lie, cheat and falsely accuse!!
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
Hmmmmmm...... Wlll willard go quietly? with only days to go, the electoral college seems more and more certain to deliver 270+ votes for the incumbent president. Will romney bow out gracefully..... or will he pitch a fit and demand even more undeserved attention? Most intelligent people already know the answer....
Rubbish. Obama can't get past 212. He can't win Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Iowa, Colorado no way. He will probably lose Pennsylvania and Wisconsin also.
ok - believe what you will. But in the event that you are wrong.... Do you think the gopers will pitch a fit? will they file lawsuits?
Who knows. I thought every since 2000 that elections are fucked forever now because of lawsuits. I think some suits could have merit. Such as making sure the military votes are counted. Making sure deadlines to vote are deadlines. On a side note. I think we need to get rid of early voting. It is supposed to be election day not election month. I think early extended voting makes fraud easier.
www.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=31057
I disagree completely. We, as Americans should be doing everything we can to encourage all Americans to vote. I am all for expanding early voting, expanding voting hours and increasing the time period between the end of voting and the publication of results to ensure that ALL votes are counted, verified, and recorded. Ease and convenience of voting have nothing to do with "vote fraud"
In long term voting. What are the safeguards against voting in multiple states? I don't think there are any. I don't think we should encourage all Americans to vote. Some people are not informed at all. That they don't vote doesn't bother me.
A lot of people are too stupid to be allowed to vote. If the can't tell you who their State Representative is, boot 'em out.
of course you don't. Most people are as informed as they care to be.... and I think that the "uninformed" have just as much right to participate in the process as those who are misinformed..... which would be the majority of the voters..... "That they don't vote doesn't bother me." - not surprising.
right, right.... So I guess you'd agree that, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
So you think it would be good to have millions of people randomly choosing candidates that they know nothing about. That would be like choosing a random person out of the phone book to be President. Hey on second thought picking the president randomly out of the phone book might actually work better then what we have right now. ;)
Not at all, even you can grasp the fact that there are a limited number of candidates on each state's ballot..... "Hey on second thought picking the president randomly out of the phone book might actually work better then what we have right now." Now that is an approach I think we can both get behind! Actually I'd be a fan of an "American Idol" style show that would produce several candidates each election period.....
"I am relying on my personal experience with Morons, which have been universally positive." -jwpegler
#2. To: calcon (#0)
He lives in a bubble, but it is a bubble of his own creation, and because of that, he can't see it as a bubble. He sees it as reality.
#3. To: calcon (#0)
When reality ensues on November 7 -- who knows how he will react? Being a god is great as long as people believe, but once they do not, you become a mere mortal. Will Obama accept that?
#4. To: CZ82, calcon (#3)
(Edited)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#5. To: hondo68, AKA Stone (#4)
Another recount Christmas?
#6. To: calcon (#0)
will bam go quietly after defeat?
#7. To: Jameson (#6)
with only days to go, the electoral college seems more and more certain to deliver 270+ votes for the incumbent president.
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
Rubbish. Obama can't get past 212.
#9. To: Jameson (#8)
Do you think the gopers will pitch a fit? will they file lawsuits?
#10. To: Jameson (#8)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#9)
On a side note. I think we need to get rid of early voting. It is supposed to be election day not election month. I think early extended voting makes fraud easier.
#12. To: Jameson (#11)
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing [sic] the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
#13. To: Jameson (#11)
#14. To: Jameson (#11)
We, as Americans should be doing everything we can to encourage all Americans to vote.
#15. To: A K A Stone (#13)
I don't think we should encourage all Americans to vote. Some people are not informed at all. That they don't vote doesn't bother me.
#16. To: Abcdefg (#14)
A lot of people are too stupid to be allowed to vote. If the can't tell you who their State Representative is, boot 'em out.
#17. To: Jameson (#15)
#18. To: A K A Stone (#17)
That would be like choosing a random person out of the phone book to be President.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]