Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-6 (Gun Grabber Kucinich continues hisd turncoating on 9-11 truth and is found to be puppet for Kolvenbach, New Mexico Aspartame Lobbyest uncovered, Another colledge professor pushed Depopulation, Noam Chompsky.)
Source:
00 - Hotherp Reports
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 12, 2007
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2007-02-12 02:32:06 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Kucinich, Chompsky, Turncoat, Aspartame, Depopulation, Invention Supression
Views: 358
Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 2007-6 (Gun Grabber Kucinich continues his turncoating on 9-11 truth and is found to be puppet for Kolvenbach, New Mexico Aspartame Lobbyist uncovered, Another colledge professor pushed Depopulation, Noam Chompsky, model for Kucinich, More invention suppression.) Dennis Kucinich figures again in the bites this week for his recent turncoating on 9-11 truth. We also look at Noam Chomsky a so called "independent" leftist "intellectual" as the probable model for this turncoating. We will also be looking at Harvard Nuroscientist John Reid and his promulgation of N W O depopulation doctrine. Also featured is another example of N W O invention suppression done through the big pharma and big chemical company Johnson and Johnson and the CNN Cable news Network. As Always Remember the KEY and enjoy. This week Greg Szymanski continues his report on the Dennis Kucinich turncoating on the 9-11 truth issue. Furthermore the leading Anti Jesuit spokesperson today Eric Jon Phelps has tied Kucinich to the Jesuit order and their arm of the N W O. Here are some of the highlights: {[Presidential candidate Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) continues to dance around the 9/11 issue like a cowardly man afraid to confront the truth and a man obviously in the pocket of the Vatican-led New World Order. "He never will confront the real issues, never will talk about the Vatican-Jesuit Order control over our government, never will get to truth about 9/11 and is a man that shouldn't be trusted," said Eric Jon Phelps, author of the book Vatican Assassins when told that Kucinich backed off the 9/11 truth issue, saying "9/11 was a thing of the past."] [Marsh-O'Conner recently appeared on Greg Szymanski's international radio show, The Investigative Journal on the Republic Broadcasting Network at http://www.republicbroadcasting.org, saying Kucinich has turned his back on America, the 9/11 victims and the family members who lost their loved ones. She said for years she held out hope Kucinich was on the side of the people, but was hurt, shocked, angered and completely disillusioned with the Ohio Congressman when she realized he finally turned tail and was running scared from getting at the truth behind 9/11. "He is not getting my vote for President and his response about 9/11 shows he is no different than the rest of people trying to hide the real truth about 9/11," added Marsh-O'Conner during the RBN radio broadcast. "I no longer have any hope he will America get to the truth."] [And Marsh-O'Conner is not the only one disappointed with what appears to be the slick talking Kucinich, who apparently is now talking the talk but not walking the walk. Galen Miechick, a former campaign worker for the Congressman, speculated the powers that be finally "got to Kucinich", forcing him to back-off on opening a new probe into 9/11. "I don't know why he changed his stance, but I would guess he fears for his life. He is nothing but a coward in my eyes," said the former Kucinich campaign worker. I believe he is nothing but a traitor and I would never support him again because Kucinich has already indicated, through his spokesperson, that the committee that he now chairs will NOT be investigating 9-11! "Right now I am putting my support and energy behind John Buchanan who will be seeking 9/11 truth and running for President under the banner of the Citizens' Candidate Party. I'm helping pull together a core team that believes he can be the next President."] [Other patriots like Phelps are not as kind as Miechick, saying Kucinich is just another shill of the New World Order and the powerful Vatican, asked to play a deceptive role as the liberal in Congressman fighting against the war, evil and corruption when, in essence, he was put there to placate the America people, making everyone falsely believe that someone in Washington is actually working for the people's best interests.] [Although to those in denial or oblivious about the real corruption in the entire House and Senate - bar none - Kucinich appears to behind 9/11 truth. But in reality to the millions of more savvy Americans, Kucinich is nothing more than a smart political showman, his statements and the "big if" designed to deceive and sidestep the real 9/11 issues. "What do you mean if there is scientific evidence," said one Colorado patriot. "He is a joke, a man bought and paid off by the Vatican, playing his part liker a good Jesuit Order and New World minion. I would never vote for a coward and a traitor like him. "There is plenty of 9/11 evidence indicating the government story is a joke and traitors in our government were involved in the planning and cover-up of 9/11. Kucinich is just dancing around the 9/11 issue and can only go so far. If he tells the truth, he is out. If he tells the truth, he knows he will become another Paul Wellstone. Plain and simple he is a coward."]} Once again further proof that you cant trust a Jesuit "short robe" GUN GRABBER on ANYTHING. Kucinich is showing his true colors as nothing more than a BOT of the Jesuit Superior General, Peter hans Kolvenbach. You can read more of the current http://arcticbeacon.com report on Kucinich here" http://www.arcticbeacon.com/8-Feb-2007.html John Garst is a pro Aspartame lobbyist who brags that he is the leading serial poisoner behind keeping Aspartame legal in New Mexico last year and he is at it again according to the http://rense.com website. Since the 1980s Aspartame has been one of the most successful depopulation poisons the New World Order has ever infiltrated our food supply with because of its sweet albeit very artificial taste. Ever since its legalization through the manipulation of the choice of FDA Commissioner under the Reagan administration by one Donald Rumsfeld lies about its safety have kept it there. Here are some highlights of the http://rense.com report. {[John Garst brags that he played a major role in obliterating efforts to ban aspartame in 06. Hes trying to do it again by bombarding legislators with complicated lingo only a biochemist can comprehend. Its a vacuous bluff with hot air said James Bowen MD. who is a physician, surgeon, biochemist, and an aspartame victim with Lou Gehrigs. New Mexico lawmakers are expected to take Garth's word for it and do what he wants. This last-minute blast is an ambush in bad faith, like yelling fire in a crowded theater so the legislature will run for the exits. Garst wants a stampede! Good faith requires him to come forward in time for his assertions to be examined. But then he would be exposed. With no time for deliberation the legislators are expected to just accept his say-so.] [There were also 74, sponsored by NutraSweet, which said its safe as rain. Dr. Walton concluded Serious questions have been raised about the reliability of industry-sponsored studies of the safety of synthetic chemicals. Aspartame, in particular, has been the focus of significant ongoing controversy Walton named numerous adverse clinical events including seizures, mood disorders, headaches and brain tumors. In 95 the FDA listed 92 reactions from 10,000 volunteered complaints, including death.] [H. J. Roberts, M.D., FACP a diabetic specialist has produced 20 books and his first text on medical diagnosis was used by 60,000 doctors to prepare for their Board examinations. In his response to Garst's allegation that aspartame sensitivity reflects folate deficiency, he wrote to the members of the New Mexico Legislature: You have received correspondence concerning folate deficiency as the purported cause of aspartame disease. While folate plays a role in the metabolism of methanol (methyl alcohol), the severity and widespread nature of reactions to aspartame products suggest that this assertion must be tempered by the following: *The methyl alcohol in aspartame is FREE (rarely found as such in nature.) *The assertion that methanol concentrations never are very high after aspartame ingestion is erroneous. I devoted an entire chapter to methanol toxicity in my text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic (pp 668-685), and show in Figure XXI-1 the dose-related blood levels of methanollasting 8 or more hours. *The assertion that many New Mexicans suffer from a folate deficiency is challenged. While I discussed such a theoretical deficiency in my text, there is no evidence that folate deficiency is widespread among Americans. For example, a Mayo Clinic study involving thousands of blood assays concluded that it was rare. Garst ignores the major roles of phenylalanine and aspartic acid in aspartame disease. Enormous effort has gone into this constructive attempt to ban aspartame products. I believe that it constitutes an imminent health hazard for New Mexicans. You are to be congratulated for coming this far in the face of severe corporate resistance. H. J. Roberts, M.D., FACP, FCCP] [Dr. Maria Alemany, Departament du Nutricio I Bromatologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, who was the researcher for the damning Trocho Study wrote that he was deeply insulted by Garsts propaganda. Remember that Dr. Alemanys study proved the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. As we know when you damage DNA you can destroy humanity. So concerned for the public was Dr. Alemany that after his study he reported it to the authorities. He told me personally that he was concerned aspartame could kill millions and I said has killed millions. After all aspartame can trigger all sorts of neurodegenerative diseases and tumors and can precipitate diabetes. Even the FDA found many types of tumors and brain cancer on original studies and the Ramazzini Study in 2005 confirmed FDA findings reporting the study showed aspartame to be a multipotential carcinogen. Dr. Alemany is a hero to the world and proved beyond a shadow of doubt what aspartame experts believed for years. Dr. Alemany said: First, Garst suggests that perhaps aspartame just affects people with a metabolic deficit. If that were the case (I doubt it, deficits may just enhance the effect of aspartame), why then has it not been studied? In the case of cyclamate, the ban on its use is based on the deleterious effects on only a fraction of the population Second. Dr. Garst accepts that aspartame yields formaldehyde... then, why not give formaldehyde to the people to help them synthesize methyl groups? Did I understood well (after speaking of the double helix which has very little to do here unless for the binding of formaldehyde to its strands to induce mutation) that Dr. Garst suggests that aspartame may be beneficial because its derived formaldehyde may supply one-carbon units for methylations through the folate pathway? If that were the case, why not get the FDA approval for aspartame as a drug/vitamin substitute? This is an outright fallacy (or better said bull-manure). Third. Please, not again the tale of the methyl-esters of pectins! It has been proved to nausea that most of the methyl-alcohol esters of uronic acids remain esterified through intestinal passage, and that freed in the large intestine by the action of the flora is majoritarily and keenly used by these microbes for their profit. The remaining methyl alcohol leaving the intestine is largely detoxified by the liver (this is a physiological mechanism well known and proved effective for millennia). Aspartame, however, is not fully hydrolyzed in the intestine, being absorbed in part intact. After the intestine-portal vein-liver trap is surpassed, the body protection against methanol wanes, and the tiny liberation of methanol in tissues yields little amounts of formaldehyde that cause serious damage, precisely because it behaves very differently from the natural products methanol. Even in cases of wood-alcohol (methanol) intoxication, the liver helps to stem the overflow of toxic. Methanol inhalation or injection is much more dangerous, because it goes directly into the bloodstream and tissues jumping the liver barrier. This is explained in elementary physiology and biochemistry courses, it is unbelievable that this is maintained as a "serious" scientific position by somebody that got a PhD, unless this is not a discourse of science but of economy. Theories are nice, but have to be proved true. The one Dr. Garst exposes here is that maintained by pro-aspartame fellows for decades. This is how they explained the incorporation of aspartame label into protein and DNA in the earliest experiments on aspartame using tracers that were published (none was published by this group thereafter). This theory fits very well with the story of a harmless aspartame, but it has been proven untrue. We did it, and this is why our study was so damaging. If the theory recycled by Dr. Garst were true, then, the carbon of the methyl alcohol of aspartame would enter the one-carbon path mediated by tetrahydrofolate, this can be done via formaldehyde or via formate. These one-carbon units may be processed (depending on demand) to methyl groups, such as those found in carnitine, thymine and methionine (the only amino acid that can get back methyl groups in mammals), thus explaining the presence of label in protein (methionine) or DNA (thymine). We gave labeled aspartame to rats, and got their DNA and protein from a number of tissues, and found large proportions of label. So far no differences with the Aspartame-lovers theory. However, we hydrolyzed the protein and DNA and looked for label in thymine in DNA and methionine in protein. We found none. Instead, the label was in unknown spots in the chromatograms, which plainly indicates that the incorporation of label into DNA and protein was NOT through the incorporation of methyl groups, i.e. the one-carbon folate pathway. Other ways of label incorporation should explain the attachment of the label. The most logical explanation (justified by innumerable studies that show that formaldehyde attaches to protein and other molecules) was that aspartame-derived formaldehyde was chemically bound to protein and DNA, inactivating (embalming, in fact) proteins and altering DNA structure causing mutations. The experimental studies show that the theory is faulty. No counter-experiments were published showing our possible "errors", nor the theory of folate pathway incorporation has been proved experimentally (it is fairly easy to demonstrate, it only needs to be true, however). This is why I felt insulted. It is an insult to the intelligence of anybody with even a thin varnish of scientific knowledge to discard proven facts and stick to self-fulfilling harebrained theories. If what the aspartame lovers say about the fate of aspartame carbon is true, why nobody has proved it experimentally? It is easy to carry out and much less expensive than hiring lawyers to defend bad science with top dollar legal expertise I used as heading the famous initial words of the second Catilinary by Cicero, which I remember from my early high-school Latin. Since probably most Americans were lucky enough not to study Latin when 10-11 years old, I provide an approximate translation: "Up to when do you, Catilina, will abuse our patience?", substitute Catilina for the present aspartame producers and probably it fits very well the picture. Good luck on the banning of this menace to our collective health. Best regards, [Dr. John Garst is a Ph.D and its obvious he knows he is publishing false information. His modus operandi is to use his credentials to deceive others because he cant debate true experts who can easily take apart his nonsense. The New Mexico legislature has better sense to even consider Garst's claptrap. Aspartame manufacturers must sit up at night thinking of ways to deceive. Families all over the world have been destroyed by this poison causing male sexual dysfunction, cancer and diabetes and sudden death. Enough is enough. Aspartame must be banned from the planet to save the human race.]} You can read the full http://rense.com report on John Garst here: http://www.rense.com/general75/flak.htm this next bite addresses the question of who and what exactly is behind Aspartame and other devices of mass depopulation. One problem with most answers to this question is that they tend to rely entirely on the leftist/anti corporate/anti consumerism stock answer "it is all about money". Is I have shown several times in dealing with Aspartame and other depopulation weapons this stock answer does not make sense BECAUSE THE PEOPLE BEHIND ASPARTAME ARE ALSO BEHIND CENTRAL BANKING AND PRINT THE MONEY. They in fact KNOW how WORTHLESS our money weather the dollar, yen, euro, peso and the proposed "amero" really is. Consumerism and "money" make for a good devices to keep the sheeple contented and in order but they ARE NOT an N W O end in and of themselves as many on the left like the "addbusters" web site would have you believe. One must always remember that the N W O basically sees the sheeple "consumers" as exactly that, LIVESTOCK and as any experienced rancher or farmer knows livestock occasionally is "culled" in order to keep its population from becoming disruptive on the farm or ranch and most of it except for an exclusive "breeding stock" is sold to the food markets of the cities. This leads to the real reason for Aspartame, Slenda or Sucralose, Mono Sodium Glutamate, Depleted Uranium, Chemtrails, Mad Cow, AIDS and all the rest of the depopulation weapons of the N W O. They are basically CULLING AGENTS to be used before the real culling starts in the CAMPS. The recipient of this bite is one who reflects this "livestock" and "culling" mentality of human populations to a tee in his philosophy. John Reid, a nuroscientist form the emerging gun controlled police state of modern Australia. Here are some samples of Mr. Reid's depopulation methods: {[Consider just a few examples of the measures people will have to accept: First and foremost the notion of steady economic growth ? every year an increase in the world?s GDP, as The Wentworth Group of Scientists and the Stern Review envisage ? will have to go into reverse. We in the affluent world will have to accept substantial reductions in our standard of living to allow space for the poor, mainly in Africa, to improve their nutrition and health status. To achieve this, income and wealth distribution within our societies will have to become much more equal. The higher up the tree one is, the greater the sacrifice one will have to make. Stringent measures will have to be put in place to reduce water consumption, particularly in countries like Australia where water is a scarce commodity. Using potable water to cool industrial processes and as wash-water will have to stop, and this includes air-conditioning equipment in large buildings, power station cooling towers, paper mills, dairying and agriculture, etc, etc. And forget the idea that water can be used to grow cotton in Australia. I have heard it argued that the return on the cost of the water is higher for cotton than the return on the same water used to grow food. This is the private-benefit-at-the-expense-of-public-cost argument, and it won?t wash!] [Perhaps water meters that turn off automatically after a household?s daily ration of water has been consumed will be fitted to every house. Meat will be rationed to no more than, say, 200 grams per person per week. Municipal authorities will provide allotments so that people can grow their own fruit and vegetables. We could turn some iconic sports arenas into vegie gardens. And private property rights will be severely curtailed to prevent landowners from engaging in environmentally-damaging behaviours. And many, many more such infringements on what we now regard as our rights will have to be accepted.] [If we do not delude ourselves, and if we accept the calculations made by the Global Footprint Network and WWF (and I know of no scientific analysis that refutes the basic validity of the model) there is only one ineluctable conclusion. The population of the world must be very quickly reduced to 5 billion (that is, if 6 billions equals 120% of capacity, then 5 billions equals 100%). And then, as the average level of affluence rises, fairly quickly reduced further to, say, 2 to 3 billion.] [The urgent discussion then becomes, how do we achieve these targets? Leaving aside uncontrollable natural events, such as a collision with a large asteroid or comet, or the eruption of a super-volcano, there is only a limited number of ways population decrease can be achieved. These ways are all painful, and most are brutally painful in their effect. Let us canvass them. When we consider ways to reduce the human population there is a natural dichotomy between ways that kill a very large number of people and ways that control the growth of the population, that is, ways that prevent people from breeding. War, Pestilence, and Famine, three of the horsemen of the apocalypse, can bring about a reduction in the human population. But these kill on a scale of tens of millions, which is not enough to solve the problem of over-population. And they are most brutal in the ways they kill. Consequently, let us consider the alternative. The most humane way to achieve a reduction in the human population would be for people to voluntarily stop breeding, but this would never happen. The urge to procreate and the innate belief that people have the inalienable right, if not the duty, to have children is too strong to be suppressed, just to save the planet. One small, but appropriate, token gesture would be to ban immediately all forms of assisted conception, including the use of donated sperm or ova. The fact that relatively affluent couples, or single women who cannot achieve pregnancy by good old-fashioned copulation, or even choose not to do so, can demand the use of expensive medical technology to satisfy their need? for parenthood is unacceptable in a hugely overpopulated world.] [The next most human way to reduce the population might be to put something in the water, a virus that would be specific to the human reproductive system and would make a substantial proportion of the population infertile. Perhaps a virus that would knock out the genes that produce certain hormones necessary for conception. The world?s most affluent populations should be targeted first. According to the 2006 Living Planet Report, the six populations that have the biggest per capita ecological footprint live in the United Arab Emirates, the United States of America, Finland, Canada, Kuwait, and Australia. (Coral Snake) this one is particularly dangerous and stupid because it is precisely the most "affluent" populations (Whites and technologically inclined Asians like the Japanese and South Koreans) THAT ARE NOT REPRODUCING THEMSELVES TO EVEN REPLACEMENT LEVEL these days, Probably because this kind of N W O population scare propaganda is mainly aimed at them. People like this are another reason to get rid of gun control even if it made crime go up to do so. These N W O elite "scientists" make street criminals look like saints in comparison to them.]} Read more of this on this blog site along with some comments from the blog's readers about it: http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/2005 While this bite is based on an old http://prisonplanet.com article from last year I'm including it because I believe that it might shed light on Dennis Kucinich's turncoating on the 9-11 truth issue. This is because Chompsky's leftist model generally resembles that of Kucinich to a great degree and Kicinich may simply be following Chompsky's ideas on 9-11 truth as well. (Chompsky generally denies the "inside job" theory of 9-11 and says that belief in it represents a danger to the left.) Here are some highlights of the article: {[Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America?s premier dissident intellectual, a fearless purveyor of truth battling against media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations. He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly master whose logic is beyond question. However as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse honest activists. In fact, since the 1960's Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.] [His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame ?America? and ?corporations? while failing to examine the hidden Globalist overclass which pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction. Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky offers the solution of world government under the United Nations.] [Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are ?nothing organizations.? When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt. (Coral Snake) Sound familiar, think Dennis Kucinich.] [What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World Order.] [The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unevenly between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations allowed to die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why was America attacked on 9-11? In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population? Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky?s hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation. (Coral Snake) the Tavistock Institute is the hidden power behind much of the popular "entertainment" of the late 20th century including the Beatles, Rolling Stones and perhaps other British Rock groups.] [Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion. The following analysis will show that Noam Chomsky is a deep cover agent for the New World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives become clear with a sober and honest examination.] [ Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The ?radical? Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes the staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge and participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist movements worldwide: ?If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in my ? In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence because according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would be ?the end of the Left.? Chomsky?s role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each piece of evidence individually. The following examples should suffice: [A) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19 hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the remaining 12 were trained as U.S. Air Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of the accused ?religious fanatics? acted more like degenerate contract agents, as they flashed wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine, smoked weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich Florida keys. Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence of these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes (walking through airport security does not count). Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers. Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following: Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that everyone B) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart?s single engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20 minutes. But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia. These ?mock? drills, designed to give live on 9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA?s Echelon network. Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the following: ?Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from the really serious issues.? C) What about the document called ?Operation Northwoods? signed off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men, sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included the following: -"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba." -"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government." - "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation." This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear evidence that the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the Northwoods document matters: Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for Chomsky's role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy. When presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn?t exist. He resorts to emotional ?they would never do it? appeals in order to deny the obvious. Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively engaging in disinformation.]} Ypou can read the complete http://prisonplanet.com article here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/060406Chomsky.htm Did you know that big pharma and the Jesuit/N W O crowd even wants to monopolistically control which dental floss you use. The http://arcticbeacon.com website reports this week on the story of an inventor who was sentenced to two years in jail for the "crime" of competing with the N W O/Vatican owned Johnson and Johnson company in the dental floss market. Here are some of the highlights of the arcticbeacon report: {[Vatican-Led NWO Minions in Business and Media Even Dictate What Type of Dental Floss To Use Sean Dix, developer of a new and improved sterilized dental floss spent two years in jail for trying to take on Johnson &Johnson. Ted Turner's CNN even pitched in to help destroy Dix, who tried to provide the first sterilized floss in the market place. 9 Feb 2007] [The tentacles of the Vatican-led NWO stretch deep into every segment of American society, even dictating the type of dental floss used to clean teeth. Sound far fetched? Well it's not, according to inventor and product developer, Sean Dix, who spent two years in jail for trying to fight the corporate state of America set up destroy anybody who tries to buck the system and disrupt the powers that be. And Dix's incredible story serves as a prime example of how the Illuminati minions in business, the media and the Vatican have teamed up to create a devouring monster ready to consume total freedom in this country, including the freedom for "the little guy" to bring new and improved products and technology to the market place.] [Dix appeared Thursday on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal on the Republic Broadcasting Network at http://www.republicbroadcasting.org, telling how he tried to take on Johnson & Johnson with a new and improved type of dental floss, but instead of being allowed to compete fairly, became the subject of death threats and finally put in jail for two years. "All the powers that be teamed up to keep my product off the market, including Ted Turner's CNN, the anti-trust department, the courts and Johnson & Johnson," said Dix during the radio interview, explaining that he came up with the first sterilized dental floss on the market with a new and improved packaging system. "I didn't even realize that not one dental floss company in the market sterilizes its flossing product. When J&J got wind of my product after I filed for a patent, all hell broke loose. They realized they would have to retool their entire production department, costing a fortune. They also realized how it could devastate their business because if you had the choice to use a sterilized floss or one that wasn't, what would you do?" Dix further explained in his radio interview how CNN conspired with J&J to discredit his product, running a series of stories which were misleading and false. He added that the rest of the media wouldn't touch his story, leaving him alone and penniless as investors jumped off his band wagon after the unfounded and negative publicity. "They all conspired to get rid of me and my product because, I guess, it was cheaper and more cost effective to get rid of me then compete fairly on the open market," added Dix, whose product is demonstrated at http://www.flossrings.com. "In a nutshell, they got me out of the way and I ended up in jail. I have been ignored by the media and even the story of how I was railroaded in court has been suppressed."]} One may not think that issues like dental floss and light bulbs (covered in last week's bites) are really all that important but stories like this one do give a ring of truth to far more important issues like patent denial, patent supression, death threats and even murder at the hands of the N W O and their puppet media in the more important issues of alternative environmentally friendly energy and engines. Therefore the bites will acontinue to cover these "trivial" examples of invention supression and banning with the same fairness as they cover major ones like electric car batteries and the like. You can read the complete http://arcticbeacon.com report here: http://www.arcticbeacon.com/9-Feb-2007.html The same http://arcticbeacon.com article on the dental floss supression case also produced a second bite, this time for the Cable News Network (CNN) for its own part in the supression of the improved dental floss invention. According to Sean Dix the inventor of the improved dental flossing system known as Floss rings as reported by http://arcticbeacon.com: {[In the early 90's, working as a diamond setter, I invented FlossRings, to make flossing easier because I had eczema which made flossing more painful than it normally is. The idea was simple, what followed is not. Lacking funds for this venture, I offered it to industry approaching a few companies, Johnson & Johnson expressed interest so I engaged them in good faith. What I didn't know was that J&J had tried to come up with a similar idea years earlier and after several years, and lots of money, J&J gave up failing to solve the problem of traditional flossing. After throwing in the towel J&J's company policy disavowed the viability of flossing devices or so I was told. Needless to say when J&J saw the FlossRings and Sterilized Floss Segments, (the razor and razor blade for oral care), they were excited and furious at the same time. The unintended blow to J&J's ego was compounded by showing J&J the Sterilized Floss Segments two months into their biggest cover-up since their inception (the Ethicon Suture Scandal where J&J knowingly released hundreds of thousands of un-sterilized sutures into distribution causing at least one death, several amputations and virulent infections that have lasted some victims for years). They did such a good job of covering that up that I knew nothing of it at the time and only found out about it years later. Unfortunately, J&J did not deal fairly with me although a fair fortune is what they were offered. I left the negotiating process due to J&J's unethical behavior and founded my company, in November of 1995.] [This is CNN In the early 90's, working as a diamond setter, I invented FlossRings, to make flossing easier because I had eczema which made flossing more painful than it normally is. The idea was simple, what followed is not. Lacking funds for this venture, I offered it to industry approaching a few companies, Johnson & Johnson expressed interest so I engaged them in good faith. What I didn't know was that J&J had tried to come up with a similar idea years earlier and after several years, and lots of money, J&J gave up failing to solve the problem of traditional flossing. After throwing in the towel J&J's company policy disavowed the viability of flossing devices or so I was told. Needless to say when J&J saw the FlossRings and Sterilized Floss Segments, (the razor and razor blade for oral care), they were excited and furious at the same time. The unintended blow to J&J's ego was compounded by showing J&J the Sterilized Floss Segments two months into their biggest cover-up since their inception (the Ethicon Suture Scandal where J&J knowingly released hundreds of thousands of un-sterilized sutures into distribution causing at least one death, several amputations and virulent infections that have lasted some victims for years). They did such a good job of covering that up that I knew nothing of it at the time and only found out about it years later. Unfortunately, J&J did not deal fairly with me although a fair fortune is what they were offered. I left the negotiating process due to J&J's unethical behavior and founded my company, in November of 1995. An iceberg is 10% visible with 90% of it's bulk below surface and so in my naivety I proceeded to cast my bread upon water unaware of the forces at work below the surface to prevent me from fulfilling my potential. June 12, 1996 would remove all doubts about what lay below the surface of my path when I believe J&J influenced CNN to air a trivializing and factually incorrect news piece two weeks before my FlossRings were inaugurated into the Dr. Samuel D. Harris National Museum of Dentistry where they are listed under George Washington's not so wooden dentures as one of the 32 permanent exhibits to visit. The fallout of a 3 ½ minute negative news piece airing every hour on the hour for several days was devastating. My phone went dead, my sales force disappeared, financial backers did not return my calls and eventually my distribution at CVS drugstores was terminated. Family and friends were initially silent in disbelief not knowing what to say. Some were helpful, some were not. The negative impact of having CNN intentionally misrepresent my invention was unavoidable. I spent the next two years pleading with CNN to do the right thing, but my requests fell on deaf ears. Finally after two years of engaging CNN in a polite manner an opportunity arose to resolve the situation. I was told by Ted Turners secretary that Ted Turner would personally review and resolve this matter and that I should send an information package to her and he would get it. Finally my patience and persistence had paid off. If they reviewed the piece they would see that it was clearly inconsistent with an invention that was about to be inaugurated into a museum not to mention the instruction by CNN to have dentists (their own) use the product improperly. I sent off my package and followed up in a few days and was told that they never got it and to please send another. I sent another Fed-Ex and this time upon following up I was re-routed to their security where I was told "don't you get it?we don't care". After two years of trying to resolve a conflict that any child could see was unjust they built my hopes up only to knock me down one more time. That was the "Straw that broke the camels back", lacking the funds to sue them on top of getting zero help from the Gov't after much effort I decided to bring CNN into court to expose this crime which severely altered my life, stunting my progress and ultimately oral hygiene in general. Seeing as how CNN requested an information package and then denied receiving it twice I decided to fax CNN the evidence they requested some 6,000 times to be sure they would receive it (Can you hear me know). After a few days of that miraculously they found my packages and promised to get back to me but they never did. Had they tried to have me prosecuted for that it would have backfired because one of the dentists who panned the FlossRings explained in a letter that CNN did not give him a package which had the instructions on the back and in a phone conversation explained that CNN instructed him to use the FlossRings improperly telling him to use 18 inches of floss when the package instructions clearly state to use 5 inches. Dr. George Reskakis further stated in his letter, " In retrospect, I believe my initial criticism may have been premature. "I now feel this is a viable and potentially valuable product for my patients." Needless to say CNN did not want to use that letter as evidence to press charges against me as it would have proven my point. My fax campaign eventually inspired a CNN security official (Thomas McCormick) to threaten me with being lost in prison inferring that this would never come to trial. When that didn't work, an ex-employee from J&J entered my life (coincidentally?) to warn me that J&J is capable of all kinds of unethical conduct including a multitude of indirect threats against my life. If he was paid to intimidate me and I believe he was that would actually constitute a direct threat against my life from J&J but tough to prove without the authorities to investigate and although that is what the authorities are paid to do they have not, will not currently, and probably never will investigate it. My rights Constitutional or otherwise are not recognized by this Gov't only my actions in defense of them. The F.B.I. and all relevant Gov't agencies refused to fulfill their duties by investigating this and so ultimately I decided to use a letter with threatening language in return designed as a tool to generate a federal trial for the sole purpose of exposing this injustice. Instead of putting an end to this oppression by acknowledging that every living being has a right to defend its ability to sustain itself as long as it does not violate anyone else's right to the same, the Gov't took the ball and ran with it using the letter to further disenfranchise me knowing full well that it was not a true threat but a demand for justice at the end of a long process of criminal and civil disenfranchisement. The trial was a complete mockery of justice from the beginning when I was brought in front of the Jury pool with my hands behind my back escorted by the U.S. Marshalls from the holding chamber (clear grounds to dismiss the case for prejudicing the jury) to the prosecutor (Todd Alley) who described himself as "a little bitty thing" to gain sympathy from the jury while contradicting and perjuring himself for the record while suppressing exculpatory and extrinsic evidence in an all out effort to convince the jury on the narrowest of margins by declaring that my "intent" in a "specific intent crime" was irrelevant and that all that mattered was that I sent a letter containing threatening language from point A to point B. On the other hand CNN and J&J's threats which were real and were intended to silence me which came years before my letter were never acknowledged. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Given that framework (illegal and unconstitutional) and not hearing any of the evidence like E-mails and letters describing in detail that I was going to do this to expose this in court the jury still came back hung not once, but twice, before the judge gave the Allen Charge meaning that the jury had to go back and come up with a verdict as if a "hung jury" were no longer an option. The jury eventually gave in and came back with a guilty verdict. After being sentenced, I completed 15 months and was released on probation with the court ordered condition of seeing a psychologist once a week for three years. The intention in my opinion was to allow me to vent with none of my energy directed towards meaningful progress the intended result being the end of my spirit to defend my livelihood. Quite the opposite happened, with the psychologist admitting on tape that he was willing to bet money that J&J was criminally involved, along with CNN and that the Gov't further harmed me by prosecuting me for a threat that he and the Gov't both knew was not a true threat. He went on to add that he could do something about all this, but that he didn't want to. That was the next straw that broke the camels back yet again, causing me to leave his office never to return thus violating the conditions of probation. I then wrote a letter to my probation officer declaring my right to end participation in a process that was admittedly forcing my cooperation in my own disenfranchisement. If the Gov't truly believed that I was a danger to anyone, they should have arrested me on the spot as anything less would be negligent. Instead they waited one whole year to the day I refused to continue to cooperate in what was admittedly a criminal violation of my rights. On Feb. 12, 2004 the U.S. Marshall's came at 8:00 A.M. to arrest me knocking me to the floor in my underwear and bathrobe while grinding a .45 Caliber gun into the back of my head, one of them shouting "I could have shot you, I could have shot you" before taking me back into the prison system in shorts, my bathrobe and shoes? no socks. Only this time the confidence in their case was beginning to unravel as all fabrications of the truth eventually do. Upon re-appearing before the Dishonorable Judge Clarence Cooper he actually acknowledged that Turner (CNN) had perpetuated a wrong upon me, his exact words, "Let me ask you this, are you telling this court you are going to spend the rest of your life trying to rectify the wrong that Turner perpetuated on you?" after explaining that I would he then admitted that he believed that I generated the trial to expose what had happened to me, his exact words, "Sean if you recall, you wanted a trial so you could expose what happened to you". These two revelations are more than enough to exonerate me, saddle the judge, prosecutor, and CNN with criminal and civil liabilities, and implicate J&J as the source but even admitting that for the public record, I was sentenced to nine more months in federal prison. I endured Prison complete with real death threats from inmates, abusive conduct from correctional officers and a host of humiliating and life threatening situations that I will not share with you at the moment and may never. There were some good experiences with decent people (inmates and officers) but those were few and far between in this decade long battle for the freedom to fulfill my potential. I was released Nov. 12, 2004 and although I'm no farther along than when I started as far as justice is concerned, I have amassed a paper trail that is public record which irrefutably speaks for itself, paid for with the loss of my livelihood for over a decade. The truth is out there. Tragically, justice is the one commodity whose supply rarely ever meets its demand to the detriment of humanity. In 1998 a clinical study conducted at Indiana University proved that FlossRings removed 23.8% more plaque than floss alone. The study was never published by Indiana University but that's another chapter in this story. So how did this re-launch of the FlossRings with the new website happen after all that ? Well, I could not in good conscience ask anyone for financial help after going through all of that knowing that every time I made one step forward I got pushed back two so when my mother insisted that I accept her help to get this back on track I accepted. Who knew better what I have been through than my mother.]} One may not think that issues like dental floss and light bulbs (covered in last week's bites) are really all that important but stories like this one do give a ring of truth to far more important issues like patent denial, patent supression, death threats kangeroo court criminal trials and even murder at the hands of the N W O and their puppet media in the more important issues of alternative environmentally friendly energy and engines. Therefore the bites will acontinue to cover these "trivial" examples of invention supression and banning with the same fairness as they cover major ones like electric car batteries and the like. You can read the complete http://arcticbeacon.com report here: http://www.arcticbeacon.com/9-Feb-2007.html 
Bite One ---> Dennis Kucinich
Bite Two ---> John Garst
Dr. Maria Alemany Departament de Nutrici i Bromatologia Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona Av. Diagonal, 645 08028 Barcelona. Espanya / Espaa / Spain] Bite Three ---> John Reid
Bite Four ---> Noam Chompsky
opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly
likely that nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I very
greatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send everyone
in Washington to the death chamber, the left is unlikely to emerge
triumphant.
in the White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what
they would have had to be to try something that would have been very
likely to turn into an utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded,
would almost certainly have leaked, so that they would all be facing the
death sentence. Possible, but not likely.
being skeptical about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not
carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in history that even remotely
resembles what is being proposed. Of course, that does not show that
the thesis is impossible: nothing could show that, by definition. And if
someone can put together some evidence and refute the arguments as to
why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be worth pursuing. Bite Five ---> Johnson and Johnson
Bite ---> CNN
By Sean Dix
(summary) More next week.
(61 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]