[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Poison Watch Title: House Votes To Override State Food Label Safety Laws House Votes To Override State Food Label Safety Laws Copley News Service 3-10-6 WASHINGTON - Legislation that could void hundreds of food safety warnings in California and other states passed the House on Wednesday after heated debate. Long sought by the food industry, the bill would prohibit states from having food-contamination standards and warning labels that are stricter than federal requirements. Exemptions could be granted if the Food and Drug Administration determines they are needed and they "would not unduly burden interstate commerce." California's Proposition 65, which requires warnings about chemicals that cause "cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm," was the main target of the House bill. But congressional analysts said it could affect 200 other regulations nationwide. The House approved the legislation 283-139, with most Republicans voting for the bill and most Democrats opposing it. The bill could face a tougher time in the Senate, where individual lawmakers have more power to block controversial measures. Opponents of the legislation - including consumer groups, numerous state attorneys general, and state food and drug officials - said it would affect warnings about high mercury levels in certain fish, which can cause brain damage in infants; egg safety; dietary supplement dangers; and pesticides on produce. They noted that state and local officials conduct most food safety inspections. "They are the ones with the expertise. But this law will allow the FDA to invalidate state labeling laws and apply their own lower standards nationwide. The consequences of this bill are going to be drastic," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y. But advocates of the legislation said it was costly and confusing for food processors to deal with different state labeling requirements. They also argued that states could keep their regulations if they convince the FDA they are sound or, in the case of adulteration standards, if the FDA has not set a standard itself. "Science is science is science. If we're going to protect pregnant women and we're going to protect children ... we ought to do it in all 50 states," said sponsoring Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich. "This is an interstate matter." To stop the Food Safety Uniformity Act when it comes to the Senate. See _www.senate.gov_ (http://www.senate.gov) to find your states senators and contact them to stop the bill when it gets to the Senate.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Coral Snake (#0)
So this is what we do with power when we "win" and are finally in control?
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|