[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Weird Stuff/Unexplained Title: BIOMETRICS FINDS NEW EVIDENCE Re:Crime Of The Century New Scientific Methods are unraveling the Web Of Bullshit Regarding Who Killed Our President This year will mark the 40th anniversary of the murder of President Kennedy in Dallas. From the very beginning, there have been unanswered questions surrounding this tragic crime. Everyone from Nixon to the Mafia has been accused, and there have been many "solutions" proposed. I am not going to try to solve the crime here. But, due to brand-new "facial recognition" technology being used by the U.S. government, I would like to introduce for the first time anywhere scientific evidence that should shock anyone who cares about what happened in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. BODY DOUBLE? The murder of Dallas Policeman J.D. Tippet is a confusing twist to the story of the assassination. Why was he killed, and by whom? I don't know the answer to that question, but I can say that Tippet looked so much like the President that people often commented about it. He was killed 40 minutes after the President and taken to the same hospital, with a bullet wound to his head being the cause of death. Eerily enough, Tippet's wounds were identical to those reported by the JFK autopsy. Tippet was buried the following day in a closed casket. An examination of photos of Tippet and Kennedy shows great resemblance. Could he have been murdered so that his body could be used for x-rays and other forensics available at the time? Was J.D. Tippet ultimately buried at Arlington Cemetery? As shocking as this may seem, consider the words of Senator Robert F. Kennedy as he viewed the body in the open casket. William Manchester reports that as RFK looked at his "brother" for the last time, he said: "It doesn't look like him at all". Manchester's news story continues, "His eyes full, the Attorney General turned to Bill Walton and whispered, 'Please look, I want to know what you think.' Walton looked as long as he could, with a growing sense of outrage. He said to Bob, 'You mustn't keep it open. It has no resemblance to the President.'" Arthur Schlesinger said: "It is appalling,...At first glance it seemed all right, but I am nearsighted. When I came closer it looked less and less like him." And Jacqueline Kennedy said, "It wasn't Jack. It was like something you would see at Madame Tussaud's." THE THREE TRAMPS: The photos taken by newsmen of three "hobos" have caused a lot of controversy over the years. There were three "well-dressed" tramps arrested near Dealey Plaza after the assassination. The men were clean-shaven and sported new haircuts and new shoes. Many believe that these so-called tramps were in fact CIA agents. Adding to the mystery, the tramps were never booked or photographed. Two of the tramps, according to many observers, look very much like Watergate burglars and former CIA employees, E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis. Official reports deny any links between the tramps and Hunt and Sturgis. The third looks to us like Sergio Arcacha Smith. To my knowledge, no one has ever said Sergio Arcacha Smith was one of the trio, although stripper Rose Cheramie identified him as her traveling companion and told Louisiana police he was going to Dallas to kill Kennedy several days before the assassination. (see Jack Ruby's Girls - Nightmoves Oct 2002). Smith was an anti-Castro operative and drug-runner with CIA connections. However, there is now a way to determine with some degree of scientific accuracy whether these men are in fact Smith, Hunt and Sturgis. It is a new science called Biometrics - facial recognition. This new field measures facial angles and distances, and forms a template. Ratios, angles and distances are then calculated and compared. Following the established protocols, I made such templates for Smith, Hunt and Sturgis, and compared them to the "hobos". The results are amazing. The biometric evidence corroborates that these "tramps" were indeed Smith, Sturgis and Hunt. In fact, there are thousands of criminals convicted on less evidence every year in Texas alone. Hunt and Sturgis have previously been alleged to be among the three tramps, but those who said so always said that tramp #1 was Sturgis - and the photos DO seem to favor. But biometrically, this theory doesn't work - Sturgis matches #2. And the previously unmentioned Smith is a perfect match for tramp #1. Thus modern science reveals more of the truth about the mysterious murder of President Kennedy. Only the application of new sciences and forensics can eventually answer all of the questions regarding the Crime of the Century. It would be informative to know if Officer Tippet's grave actually contains his remains. It is interesting to note that the same year that DNA became admissible in U.S. courts, the brain of JFK disappeared. Was it really his? What other mysteries may be solved soon by new scientific techniques? GATOR Mathematically, the odds that this is NOT Lee Harvey Oswald are about 1 in 13 That means that biometrically, more likely than not this is Lee Harvey Oswald, watching the President from the first floor. So, if Oswald was downstairs, the question arises: "Who REALLY shot the President?" Why was Oswald silenced? What was the CIA doing there? NOTE: Only in 1974 were the photos of the 3 "tramps" released. Before then they were in the possession of persons in the Democratic Party. Nobody has ever asked what Hunt & Sturgis were looking for in the Watergate burglary, because the answer was too embarrassing for BOTH parties. I believe they were looking for the photos of themselves in Dallas, Nov 22, 1963. A Nixon informant in the Washington DC Democratic headquarters discovered the existence of the photos, along with Democratic plans to use them to discredit Nixon's henchmen. Hunt and Sturgis were covering their OWN asses in the burglary. #1 JFK AUTOPSY #2 OFFICER JD TIPPET #3 PRESIDENT KENNEDY FIVE LINE ANALYSIS: The length and geometric angles of the five lines used on all three photos are identical. In the first photo, lines were drawn from the ear center to the corner of the eye, tip of the nose, upper lip, and point of the chin. A fifth line from tip of nose to tip of chin was added. The same grid was placed over the second two photos. It matches closely photo number two, but fails to work on number three. This is because Tippet's chin was not as prominent as JFK's. Also, notice the difference in the earlobes on #1 and #3. The famous Altgens photo taken at the moment the second shot rang out. Conspiracy theorists have long said that the man in the doorway looks like Oswald, but this is the first proof. Tramp #2 - 1963 Tramp #3 - 1963 E Howard Hunt - 1972 PERFECT 11 LINE MATCH PERFECT 11 LINE MATCH PERFECT 9 LINE MATCH Using principles of Biometrics, Gator Press created these templates from the above photos. Left to right are Tramp #1 & Sergio Arcacha Smith; Tramp #2 & Frank Sturgis; and Tramp #3 with E. Howard Hunt. Lines and angles are measured and compared to create a template. The templates are then overlaid for matching. All three of these are perfect matches. The biometrics matching does NOT include clothing, hair, or the shape of eyes, ears, noses and mouths - when you add that these also match, it would require voluntary ignorance to believe that none of these three was there. After years of obfuscation and denial, the truth has being uncovered by the government's own new technology. Biometrics Not A "Junk Science" I had planned to only print the article above, until I realized that there would probably be a bunch of naysayers claiming that the facial recognition techniques used in Biometrics are some type of "junk science" . The police departments and government agencies who use this technology would be the first to disagree. Plans are going forward to use the technology in airports to protect against terrorists. The first public test of Biometrics was during the Super Bowl Game in Tampa Fla, in 2001. The police in Tampa set up video cameras attached to a database of known wanted criminals. The results? 19 crooks were identified and arrested! I would say this preliminary test establishes Biometrics as a first-class method of identification! Here is how it works: Certain facial characteristics are unchanging. The distance between the corners of the eyes; the distance from the tip of the nose to the tip of the chin; the angle of the line that runs from the earlobe to the corner of the eye. These measurements, and their relationships to one another never change. Details are less important in Biometrics - angles and ratios are used, making blurred faces easily identifiable. The technology is disguise-proof, because it does not use hairstyle, skin color, eye color, beards, glasses, or any other changeable characteristics. A person could shave their head, put in colored contacts, grow a beard, and dye their skin black. Their own mother wouldn't know them. But Biometrics would! If Osama Bin Laden and other terrorists have shaved their beards and adopted western clothes, biometrics will probably be our best chance of capturing them. J.D. TIPPET Could easily have passed for a Kennedy. Is he buried in Arlington Cemetery? HISTORY'S GREATEST MARKSMAN, Although he was never known to practice, or even own a weapon until after the assassination, Lee Oswald managed to hit a moving target 4 times, using just 3 bullets! Each shot struck paydirt. The shots were all fired within 5 seconds. This was done using a $20 mail-order rifle, with a scope that was determined to be 4 feet off center at 100 yards. After each shot, he had to eject the casing, insert a round, close the bolt, aim, and fire. All in less than 2 seconds. No one can replicate the act. This will always be remembered as the greatest feat in ballistics history. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|