United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Ron Paul Supports The re-Election of Obama
Source:
beatweek
URL Source: http://www.beatweek.com/blog/12956- ... llot-is-ron-paul-going-to-run/
Published: Aug 18, 2012
Author: beatweek
Post Date: 2012-08-18 09:58:05 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 1735
Comments: 4
...the only... explanation is that Ron Paul’s libertarian party is trying to get Romney removed from the ballot for no reason other than to ensure that Obama gets reelected.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: no gnu taxes, *Ron Paul for President* (#0)
(Edited)
Ron Paul doesn't run the Libertarian Party, in fact he's not even a member. He a member of the Republican Liberty Caucus, because... he's a Republican. W. Mitt Romney supporters are working hard to get Obama reelected by nominating a losing candidate who's an Obama clone. Millions of patriotic Americans oppose Obama & Mitt, and are working to get the GOP to nominate a pro-American conservative candidate, which is what it takes to beat Obama. The bushbot neocons insist on losing. They're Obamabots, but are too dishonest to admit it. They selfishly want four more years or whining about "Marxists" and "Black Liberation Theology", while the USA goes down the toilet. Such nonsense brings in lots of revenue, to both the phony conservative GOP neocon progressive leaders, and their spokesholes like Rush and Sean. These globalist aholes couldn't care less about America. The Republican Liberty Caucus' process for endorsing presidential candidates is described in the organization's Bylaws and Rules: A candidate for President of the United States may be endorsed by the Caucus by a 2/3 vote of the active and voting Chartered state’s executive committees. The national Secretary shall notify all Chartered states of a favorable national board proposal for endorsement and state executive officers shall inform the Secretary of the approval or denial by their executive committee within 60 days.[14] Since the Caucus' founding in 1991, only two candidates have been able to galvanize this level of support: Steve Forbes 1996 and Ron Paul in 2012. Although Forbes ran again in 2000, the organization remained neutral in that primary and did not endorse another specific Republican candidate in any presidential primary until December 30, 2011 when the RLC endorsed Ron Paul for President.[15] On November 2, 2011, the Republican Liberty Caucus announced its first two endorsements in the 2012 election: Barry Hinckley, running in the Republican primary in Rhode Island, and Brian K. Hill, running in the Republican primary in Connecticut.[16][17] The Republican nominee in Rhode Island will be challenging Democratic United States Senator Sheldon Whitehouse while the Republican nominee in Connecticut will be running for an open seat being vacated by independent United States Senator Joseph Lieberman.[18] Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Four points about this article: 1.) The Libertarian Party already has a Presidential Candidate. His name is Gary Johnson. He is the ex-GOP Governor of New Mexico. Ron Paul is not going to be the Libertarian Party candidate for President. 2.) The GOP certainly did have a Senate candidate on the ballot in 2010. His name was Dino Rossi and he received 48% of the vote. 3.) The lawsuit is completely without merit. They are claiming that Dino Rossi was not nominated by the GOP. Patty Murray wasn't nominated by the Democrats either, because Washington changed how their elections are run. Parties no longer nominate their own candidates. All candidates from all parties appear on the same primary ballot and the two who receive the most votes face off in the general election. The old law was invalidated when Washington switched to the new primary system. 4.) The Libertarian Party of Washington State is a tiny little nothing group who couldn't even field one candidate on the August primary ballot. There were independent, Populist party, and Constitution party candidates on the ballot, but no Libertarian Party candidates. Why do you post this nonsense without first doing a tiny little bit of research?
Why would anyone do research on an obvious rhetorical matter? It just slows things down. Do you think I'm really worried about intelligent rebuttal?
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Yes, we all understand that posting accurate information is not in your bailiwick. That has been very clear for a long time.
Ron Paul’s libertarian party
Republican Liberty Caucus
Endorsements[edit] Presidential endorsements
[edit] Notable 2012 endorsements
Jews and Christians Together (Dump Romney)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#2. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
"we must as a species go into a period of shrinkage that we have not experienced since the Dark Ages and the Black Plague" -- lucysmom (A.K.A. minnigold)
#3. To: jwpegler (#2)
Why do you post this nonsense without first doing a tiny little bit of research?
#4. To: no gnu taxes (#3)
"we must as a species go into a period of shrinkage that we have not experienced since the Dark Ages and the Black Plague" -- lucysmom
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]