Federal judge upholds Hawaii ban on same-sex marriage
By Ken Kobayashi
Aug 08, 2012
Senior U.S. District Judge Alan Kay upheld today Hawaii laws banning same-sex marriages.
The judge issued a 117-page decision which throws out the lawsuit filed by a lesbian couple and a gay man who contended the state laws violate the U.S. Constitution due process and equal protection provisions.
Kay ruled in favor of state Health Director Loretta Fuddy and the Hawaii Family Forum, and against the three plaintiffs and Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who contended the law violated the Constitution.
Hawaiis marriage laws reserving marriage to a man and a woman are not unconstitutional, Kay said.
Nationwide, citizens are engaged in a robust debate over this divisive social issue, he said.
If the traditional institution of marriage is to be restructured, as sought by plaintiffs, it should be done by a democratically-elected legislature or the people through a constitutional amendment, not through judicial legislation that would inappropriately preempt democratic deliberation regarding whether or not to authorize same-sex marriage.
Abercrombie said he respectfully disagrees and will join in an appeal of the ruling.
To refuse individuals the right to marry on the basis of sexual orientation or gender is discrimination in light of our civil unions law, he said.
For me this is about fairness and equality.
John DAmato, lawyer for the plaintiffs, said he will appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The lawsuit was filed last year on behalf of Natasha Jackson and Janin Kleid, who were denied a marriage license here, and by Gary Bradley, against Abercrombie and Fuddy.
Abercrombie, however, agreed that the law violated the constitutional protections, which resulted Attorney General David Louies office providing one team to represent the governor and another representing Fuddy, who defended the marriage laws.
Kay earlier allowed the Hawaii Family Forum, a Christian organization, to intervene in the case and defend the laws.
He heard more than two hours of arguments in the case on July 24.
In his decision, Kay granted requests by Fuddy and the forum to immediately rule in their favor without the case going to trial. He rejected the plaintiffs request for a ruling declaring the marriage laws unconstitutional.
US. District Court ruling on same sex marriage
More From The Star-Advertiser
Federal judge hears legal arguments on same-sex marriage
Hawaii Family Forum allowed to intervene in same-sex suit
Federal court rules state's ban legitimate
Judge reviews Hawaii's gay-marriage ban
Court lets group join in defense of state's restriction
Christian hui wants to defend state law
Federal lawsuit targets isle civil unions
State of 2 minds on 1-sex marriage
Poster Comment:
Some liberals tell me hair color - eye color - skin color are the same as gender type difference too !
goofy !
The reality of marriage - family is based on biological male - female (( opposite )) sex reproduction !