[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: How Can Situations Like The Colorado Theatre Shooting Be Prevented?
Source: PU.com
URL Source: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/h ... -theatre-shooting-be-prevented
Published: Jul 24, 2012
Author: Dennis Marcellino
Post Date: 2012-07-24 08:00:32 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 72611
Comments: 120

How Can Situations Like The Colorado Theatre Shooting Be Prevented?

Written on Saturday, July 21, 2012 by Dennis Marcellino

Why didn’t these things happen in the 1950’s? Why didn’t we need airport screenings then? Why didn’t people need to lock their house or car doors then? The answer is simple. There was more order then (especially in families) … which then naturally released more love and peace and security. I lived through it so I know that to be true personally. But a person can verify what I’m saying by listening to the music back then and watching the TV shows and movies. There was a different feeling in the air … even in the most impoverished communities. There was a patriotism in a country that we could be proud of and be united behind. Can we really be proud of today’s music and morals?

Here’s what it boils down to. There is a greater tolerance for “sin” now. And the natural, inbred reaction to sin is anger … to “correct” it and to implement “justice.” But political correctness has not only forced people to swallow that sin, but they even are arrested or sued for trying to speak out against it. But then at some point it explodes … in situations like these and domestic violence, even to the point where adults murder their families. We’re seeing it more and more in the news, whereas I never saw it in the news when I was growing up. The immorality of today’s society has made it very difficult to create and maintain a good marriage and family. And the feelings tied to marriage and family are VERY powerful … and therefore the anger to correct also is great.

The pressures of today are much greater. And pressure has to be released. But the love in a family helped people in the past. That’s why there weren’t a lot of gang murders, even in the black communities, where women were respected and people dressed nice and worked hard. But more than anything, God and His laws were respected above all else. But now we have rampant pornography and out of wedlock births. And those things tear at the family and cause the greatest pressure … in a person’s heart. So then a person either turns to violence or addictions to try to bring their internal experience to a good and not bad state. And poverty isn’t an excuse, because people were still generally civil even in the great depression. And in the Bible Paul says that he has learned to be content whether in poverty or riches. As a person who is devoted to God, I know that to also be true personally. I’m content in all situations JUST because I’m tied to and understand God.

The solution is this: a happy heart doesn’t do violence. And the way to have a happy heart is to love and obey God and just be tied to people who do the same. It’s that simple. But the mainstream institutions constantly work to keep God out of the media and schools. So then kids are pressured to go along with the mainstream.

So what can we do? Don’t vote for a democrat. That party is the party that promotes more and more tolerance to sin. And educate yourself and others to the realities that I’ve stated here.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 96.

#11. To: CZ82 (#0)

Why didn’t these things happen in the 1950’s? Why didn’t we need airport screenings then? Why didn’t people need to lock their house or car doors then? The answer is simple. There was more order then (especially in families) … which then naturally released more love and peace and security.

Absolutely true,but that is only half of the story.

Back in the 50's people who were mentally disturbed were locked away in mental institutions. These people don't just suddenly spring up from out of nowhere as adults,they have been disturbed their whole lives,and their families,teachers,and friends all knew it. Then in the 1960's the ACLU with backing from people intent on destroying America won a court case put before a leftist court that stated locking mentally disturbed people away who were thought to be dangerous but had not YET hurt anyone violated their Constitutional RIGHT to be mentally disturbed and danerous,so the looney bins were emptied. The result are still seen today,with the streets of cities loaded with homeless people who die from disease and exposure to the weather while suffering greatly the whole time. Occasionally one of the loons will get angry at the world over his condition,and he strikes out to get even with the world.

The other reason is VERY closely related. Back in the 1950's if you were caught committing a violent crime,you WERE going to go to jail,and you WERE going to serve your time,period. Then the ACLU decided the prisons were overcrowded and this violated the right of the people who had never shown the slightest bit of concern about the rights of anyone else,so they started early-release programs for good behavior. Which is entirely counter-productive because what you are teaching these people then is that they can get out of prison early and escape doing their time if they just learn how to behave in prison.

The message that SHOULD be sent is "You WILL behave in prison because that is what people are expected to do in society in order to keep jobs,raise families,and live normal,peaceful lives,and because if you don't,ADDITIONAL time will be added to the sentence you are already serving."

In other words,people in the 1950's understood that actions have consequences,and bad actions result in bad consequences.

By the mid-1960's people were expecting NO consequences from bad behavior,other than maybe some free meds and a disability check.

All this can be laid directly at the feet of the Dim appointees to the Supreme Court in the 40's and 50's.

sneakypete  posted on  2012-07-24   12:43:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#11)

And along with the 1960s came the war on poverty, which effectively removed black men from the black families.

And then the 70s saw a government endorsing women killing their unborn children. That has to have an effect on society--subconsciously, of course, when even the mother, the nurturer of society, is ok to off the most innocent beings.

And while you might not agree, pete, there was and still is the on-going attempt to completely wipe God out of the public square. I don't recall which founding father said it, but one of them said that the Constitution was written for a godly citizenry.

And then all these video games/arcade games based on killing, killing, killing...scores on the numbers killed. The videos are addictive. The sounds and sights and such are mesmerizing and are just like the slot machines in casinos where addicted gamblers play mindlessly. I have actually witnessed that last scenario.

I would imagine a group could get together and come up with a great list of things which have brought about the ills of the nation. One thing I find interesting is the time frame. As I recall, back before the 1994 takeover of the house by the GOP, the Dems had been in control for some 40 years.......and those 40 years coincide with the destructive events we're describing here.

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-25   1:24:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: rowdee (#22)

And then the 70s saw a government endorsing women killing their unborn children. That has to have an effect on society--subconsciously, of course, when even the mother, the nurturer of society, is ok to off the most innocent beings.

Dee,the truth is this has always been done,ever since the dawn of time. There are only two differences. One real difference is in days of yore it was midwives smothering the babies,not doctors with a needle. That's why you didn't seem many deformed or crippled kids back in the 50's and earlier. They "died at birth".

Working class people back then,especially ones in rural and farm communities just couldn't afford,in ANY sense of the word,a child that couldn't work and contribute to the family.

The other difference is healthy babies weren't smothered at birth. They were mostly cherished by the parents,and if they parents didn't want them,they put them up for adoption to people who would cherish them.

sneakypete  posted on  2012-07-25   1:53:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete (#23)

If what you say is true, it was not goverment sanctioned as today; nor was it passed around in open society discussions, and certainly not demanded by a bunch of yowling wimmen about some 'right' they had to choose to kill their unborn.

There is a BIG difference in the scenario you present as being the norm back in those days. I personally don't buy that this was routinely done. I concede that there has always been evil flaws in mankind and wouldn't swear it never happened.

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-25   13:54:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: rowdee (#27)

If what you say is true,

Why wouldn't it be true? My own mother told me about this when I was a child. She had witnessed this happen when the older woman across the street gave birth to a monster back in the early 40's. She said the child was smothered at birth,and the woman who gave birth was told it was stillborn.

it was not goverment sanctioned as today;

No it wasn't,but what difference does that make? The results are the same.

nor was it passed around in open society discussions,

So what? The truth is often ugly,which is why so many people lie. Granted,they are polite lies (you baby was stillborn) designed to spare someone's feelings,but lies none the less.

and certainly not demanded by a bunch of yowling wimmen about some 'right' they had to choose to kill their unborn.

Wrong. While there was no yowling involved,there damn sure would have been if some of those babies had been allowed to live,and that's not even addressing the burden caring for such a child would have laid on the family.

I personally don't buy that this was routinely done.

Of course you don't. It conflicts with YOUR view on what is politically correct.

We all have our blind spots,including you and I.

The truth is even worse than that. Just a few hundred years ago living children were being left out in the cold to die in seasons where the crops had failed and the game was scarce. Just because people didn't talk about doesn't mean it didn't happen.

sneakypete  posted on  2012-07-25   14:32:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: sneakypete, rowdee, SJN (#30)

Why wouldn't it be true? My own mother told me about this when I was a child. She had witnessed this happen when the older woman across the street gave birth to a monster back in the early 40's. She said the child was smothered at birth,and the woman who gave birth was told it was stillborn.

You make the experience your mother witnessed seem like "normal" for all society. It was not. For every smothered and murdered deformed or mentally retarded baby there were 100s of thousands that were not and put in homes or cared for by the families. Back then there were plenty of church run and faith run homes where such children were properly cared for if the parents could not do it. One such home was a few blocks from my house. There I witnessed over 50 kids in wheel chairs with the most horrible deformities watch me and my friends play baseball on their grounds. Then there was a good classmate in my middle school. Had MD, went to regular classes and lived until he was 13. That little spark plug fought every day to breathe and he wanted to live and gave it his best. So the murderous midwives will have to give account for their deeds on the Last Day. And if they have not repented, it will be most horrible for them.

On the other hand, I am sure your mom did the right thing and reported the murderous bitch who smothered the babies at birth.

redleghunter  posted on  2012-07-25   14:48:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: redleghunter (#32)

You make the experience your mother witnessed seem like "normal" for all society. It was not.

Yeah,it was. If I'm wrong,direct me to all the photos of deformed children.

Children with birth defects has no chance of providing for themselves. They were a luxury people just couldn't afford.

For every smothered and murdered deformed or mentally retarded baby there were 100s of thousands that were not and put in homes or cared for by the families.

Where is the evidence of this. I only know of ONE,and he was the only child of a upper middle-class family. He was born with a deformed arm. Basically,his left hand was attached to his elbow and it was dead. Never grew and never had any motion.

BTW,how can you look at a newborn and tell he or she is retarded? Or did you just throw that in for emotional reasons?

Back then there were plenty of church run and faith run homes where such children were properly cared for if the parents could not do it.

MORE nonsense. These existed ONLY in the larger cities,and prior to the 1950's most Americans lived in rural areas.

So the murderous midwives will have to give account for their deeds on the Last Day. And if they have not repented, it will be most horrible for them.

Your kind and loving God is going to torture them for all of eternity,right?

On the other hand, I am sure your mom did the right thing and reported the murderous bitch who smothered the babies at birth.

Yes,she did the right thing,and kept her mouth shut about it,just like women have done since the dawn of time.

sneakypete  posted on  2012-07-25   15:33:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: sneakypete (#38)

Yeah,it was. If I'm wrong,direct me to all the photos of deformed children.

Children with birth defects has no chance of providing for themselves. They were a luxury people just couldn't afford.

For every smothered and murdered deformed or mentally retarded baby there were 100s of thousands that were not and put in homes or cared for by the families.

Where is the evidence of this. I only know of ONE,and he was the only child of a upper middle-class family. He was born with a deformed arm. Basically,his left hand was attached to his elbow and it was dead. Never grew and never had any motion.

BTW,how can you look at a newborn and tell he or she is retarded? Or did you just throw that in for emotional reasons?

Back then there were plenty of church run and faith run homes where such children were properly cared for if the parents could not do it.

MORE nonsense. These existed ONLY in the larger cities,and prior to the 1950's most Americans lived in rural areas.

So the murderous midwives will have to give account for their deeds on the Last Day. And if they have not repented, it will be most horrible for them.

Your kind and loving God is going to torture them for all of eternity,right?

On the other hand, I am sure your mom did the right thing and reported the murderous bitch who smothered the babies at birth.

Yes,she did the right thing,and kept her mouth shut about it,just like women have done since the dawn of time.

You can stick your head in the sand if you want but deformed children were born, have been born and continue to be born and live. Midwives and nurses know by simple response tests if a child is mentally retarded or Downs. I don't know what house of horrors you grew up in or what "children of the corn" town you resided, but your generalizations are bunk. It is clear you condone the murder of deformed children. You clearly lay out why you support the wholesale murder of those who are deformed. It is all financial and convenience related. Same bogus claim the abortionists give today.

Don't know where you get from my statements that God is going to torture deformed murdered by midwives babies. Those are your words, my words referred to the murderers who would put themselves above God to be their own god to make decisions on who should or should not live. The test of a just society is how they treat those with lesser means and those who cannot help themselves. Your "children of the corn" horror house town fails this test.

redleghunter  posted on  2012-07-25   16:55:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: redleghunter (#48)

It is clear you condone the murder of deformed children.

What a stupid thing to say. He never said one thing about condoning it.

You clearly lay out why you support the wholesale murder of those who are deformed.

Ridiculous. Why are you lying about what he said?

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-07-25   23:27:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Biff Tannen, sneakypete, A K A Stone, Liberator (#60)

It is clear you condone the murder of deformed children. What a stupid thing to say. He never said one thing about condoning it.

You clearly lay out why you support the wholesale murder of those who are deformed. Ridiculous. Why are you lying about what he said?

Perhaps you have not been following Biff. So below are quotes from sneakypete, with a few posed questions from other posters to give context. All responses are pete's if you scroll up. Pete is also pinged.

sneakypete posts on this thread regarding the smothering of children:

Dee,the truth is this has always been done,ever since the dawn of time. There are only two differences. One real difference is in days of yore it was midwives smothering the babies,not doctors with a needle. That's why you didn't seem many deformed or crippled kids back in the 50's and earlier. They "died at birth".

Working class people back then,especially ones in rural and farm communities just couldn't afford,in ANY sense of the word,a child that couldn't work and contribute to the family.

Why wouldn't it be true? My own mother told me about this when I was a child. She had witnessed this happen when the older woman across the street gave birth to a monster back in the early 40's. She said the child was smothered at birth,and the woman who gave birth was told it was stillborn.

So what? The truth is often ugly,which is why so many people lie. Granted,they are polite lies (you baby was stillborn) designed to spare someone's feelings,but lies none the less.

Wrong. While there was no yowling involved,there damn sure would have been if some of those babies had been allowed to live,and that's not even addressing the burden caring for such a child would have laid on the family. Children with birth defects has no chance of providing for themselves. They were a luxury people just couldn't afford.

On the other hand, I am sure your mom did the right thing and reported the murderous bitch who smothered the babies at birth. Yes,she did the right thing,and kept her mouth shut about it,just like women have done since the dawn of time.

So you think these midwives were doing the family a favor by murdering their children?

Of course. You are applying modern sensibilities to older realities,and feeling righteous about it.

Tell us all about how YOU would take the food out of the mouth of a healthy child that was able to do the work necessary to help keep a family alive,to give it to a unhealthy/handicapped child that would never be anything but a burden on the family and the whole "tribe".

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX End of sneakypete's comments XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

So my RLH comment is this. I see no comments from SP stating this was a horrible act. In fact, he tells us above his mother did the right thing.

redleghunter  posted on  2012-07-26   16:39:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: redleghunter (#87)

Yes, i see your point. However, i think sneaky is refusing to judge people of the past by todays standards, and youbare interpreting his refusal to judge as support.

I see him talking about what was and what is with him understanding why they did it, rather than taking sides or showing support.

I too refuse to judge them. I've been in bad situations in my life and been surprised and appalled by my decisions when i look back. I'm going to focus and spend my energy on me being better rather than standing in judgement of others. I'm not a good person. Now where near good enough to judge others decisions when they are in trouble.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2012-07-26   20:54:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: Biff Tannen (#90)

I too refuse to judge them. I've been in bad situations in my life and been surprised and appalled by my decisions when i look back. I'm going to focus and spend my energy on me being better rather than standing in judgement of others. I'm not a good person. Now where near good enough to judge others decisions when they are in trouble.

.

I have never heard rational thought expressed better.

sneakypete  posted on  2012-07-27   8:47:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 96.

        There are no replies to Comment # 96.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 96.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com