[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: Richard Dawkins: "I can't be sure God does not exist" (most famous atheist in the world blinks)
Source: The Telegraph
URL Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel ... e-sure-God-does-not-exist.html
Published: Jul 1, 2012
Author: John Bingham
Post Date: 2012-07-01 12:30:04 by Liberator
Keywords: atheist, agnostic, God
Views: 19831
Comments: 45

He is regarded as the most famous atheist in the world but last night Professor Richard Dawkins admitted he could not be sure that God does not exist.

He told the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, that he preferred to call himself an agnostic rather than an atheist.

The two men were taking part in a public “dialogue” at Oxford University at the end of a week which has seen bitter debate about the role of religion in public life in Britain.

Last week Baroness Warsi, the Tory party chairman, warned of a tide of “militant secularism” challenging the religious foundations of British society.

The discussion, in Sir Christopher Wren’s Sheldonian Theatre, attracted attention from around the world.

As well as being relayed to two other theatres, it was streamed live on the internet and promoted fierce debate on the Twitter social network.

For an hour and 20 minutes the two men politely discussed "The nature of human beings and the question of their ultimate origin" touching on the meaning of consciousness, the evolution of human language – and Dr Williams’s beard.

For much of the discussion the Archbishop sat quietly listening to Prof Dawkins’s explanations of human evolution.

At one point he told the professor that he was “inspired” by “elegance” of the professor’s explanation for the origins of life – and agreed with much of it.

Prof Dawkins told him: “What I can’t understand is why you can’t see the extraordinary beauty of the idea that life started from nothing – that is such a staggering, elegant, beautiful thing, why would you want to clutter it up with something so messy as a God?”

Dr Williams replied that he “entirely agreed” with the “beauty” of Prof Dawkins’s argument but added: “I’m not talking about God as an extra who you shoehorn on to that.”

There was surprise when Prof Dawkins acknowledged that he was less than 100 per cent certain of his conviction that there is no creator.

The philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny, who chaired the discussion, interjected: “Why don’t you call yourself an agnostic?” Prof Dawkins answered that he did.

An incredulous Sir Anthony replied: “You are described as the world’s most famous atheist.”

Prof Dawkins said that he was “6.9 out of seven” sure of his beliefs.

“I think the probability of a supernatural creator existing is very very low,” he added.

He also said that he believed it was highly likely that there was life on other planets.

At one point he discussion strayed onto the theoretical question of whether a traditional cut throat razor could be described as a more complicated thing than an electric shaver.

There was laughter as the Archbishop said he would attempt an answer before adding: “Not that I know much about razors.”

During a wide-ranging discussion the Archbishop also said that he believed that human beings had evolved from non-human ancestors but were nevertheless “in the image of God”.

He also said that the explanation for the creation of the world in the Book of Genesis could not be taken literally.

“The writers of the Bible, inspired as I believe they were, they were nonetheless not inspired to do 21st Century physics,” he said.

When Prof Dawkins suggested that he believed the Pope took a rather more literal interpretation of the origins of humans, the Archbishop joked: “I will ask him some time.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)

Amidst the observation that Prof. Dawkins' was “inspired” by “elegance” of the professor’s explanation for the origins of life, and agreed with much of it, we have THIS inanity by Dawkins:

“What I can’t understand is why you can’t see the extraordinary beauty of the idea that life started from nothing – that is such a staggering, elegant, beautiful thing, why would you want to clutter it up with something so messy as a God?”

No, we CAN'T see it, Professor Dummy. What is more staggering than a supposed respected, top "intellectual" of our time - Richard Dawkins....

1) Concluding Life was created out of nothing

2) Opining that a God or "Creator" "cutters" and "messes up" his Fantasy of "something-made-out-of-nothing". (Of course believing otherwise would also mean there's a Creator whose judgment looms)

3) Expecting the rest of us to intellectually "understand" and accept the Impossible: "Something-created-out-of-nothing" - especially a mind and consciousness - the NON-physical

Does.

NOT.

Compute.

Not that the inanity was all Dawkins...

The "Man of the Cloth" - Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, also said that the explanation for the creation of the world in the Book of Genesis could not be taken literally. HIS own Fairy Tale belief was that he believed that human beings had evolved from non-human ancestors (aka Extra-Terrestrials), but were nevertheless “in the image of God”.

Why then bother believing ANY of the Bible, Archbishop? I mean after all - Jesus Christ HIMSELF used to quote the Old Testament. Are you calling HIM a Liar?

This public “dialogue” at Oxford - one of the main symbolic "intellectual" centers of the world - was an exercise in the blind leading the blind-er.

Liberator  posted on  2012-07-01   12:40:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Liberator (#1)

Why then bother believing ANY of the Bible, Archbishop? I mean after all - Jesus Christ HIMSELF used to quote the Old Testament. Are you calling HIM a Liar?

Apparently Rowan Williams doesn't believe all the Bible.....his stance on homosexuals serving as ministers certainly isn't biblically based.

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-01   13:06:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: rowdee, TooConservative, Redleghunter (#4) (Edited)

Apparently Rowan Williams doesn't believe all the Bible.....his stance on homosexuals serving as ministers certainly isn't biblically based.

Aaaah....

So we have a shill posing as the "Christian" representation? One might ask whys this kind of "Christian" cites the Bible for ANY support of their business...er...I mean religion (cough, hack).

Btw, those collars sure are sooo convincing sometimes.

;-)

Liberator  posted on  2012-07-01   13:13:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator, GarySpFc, rowdee (#6)

Apparently Rowan Williams doesn't believe all the Bible.....his stance on homosexuals serving as ministers certainly isn't biblically based. Aaaah....

So we have a shill posing as the "Christian" representation? One might ask whys this kind of "Christian" cites the Bible for ANY support of their business...er...I mean religion (cough, hack).

Btw, those collars sure are sooo convincing sometimes.

;-)

Yeah, the atheists seem to find their "credible" opposition from the ranks of liberal "theologians."

This makes their job a lot easier.

Just wanted you to know TC no longer posts here. He confirmed this to me last week on LP. If the disturbing thread titles and language continues, I might have to go that way as well. LF is linked to Google, which archives stuff for their masters. If I get black listed for discussing and proclaiming the Word, so be it. But do not want to be dragged down as associated with potty talk, which is getting a bit heated here as of late.

redleghunter  posted on  2012-07-03   14:51:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: redleghunter, TooConservative, A K A Stone (#7)

Yeah, the atheists seem to find their "credible" opposition from the ranks of liberal "theologians."

This makes their job a lot easier.

Yup. Kinda like helping "catapulting the propaganda" (to use Dubya's words). The Devil is pleased with this kind of symposium where "our" side is represented by an un-Bible believing satanic agent of the Vatican. BIG surprise, right?

Just wanted you to know TC no longer posts here.

He confirmed this to me last week on LP. If the disturbing thread titles and language continues, I might have to go that way as well. LF is linked to Google, which archives stuff for their masters. If I get black listed for discussing and proclaiming the Word, so be it. But do not want to be dragged down as associated with potty talk, which is getting a bit heated here as of late.

I've noticed and thoroughly understand.

A K A Stone, aka a "Christian" doesn't seen to understand these kind of things about titles.

FWIW, Liberty Post frankly isn't much better at times, while vulgar "potty talk" and poisoning of that well remains business as usual there primarily because of two posters.

To tell you the truth, I've just about had it. Thank you for your fellowship and doing what you do. It is much appreciated.

Liberator  posted on  2012-07-03   15:33:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Liberator, redleghunter, TooConservative, A K A Stone, Gary SF (#8) (Edited)

I would hate to see any of you leave--I just got here. But I full well see and understand what you are saying. I'm trying to handle it as Christians are told to do. But, its entirely possible more than y'all could leave, too.

I'm very tired of the name calling, the labeling, the excessive use of garbage language as well as the potty mouth. Of course, I'm sick of politics to boot, and now a legal system that is creating taxes out of penalties, or is it penalties out of taxes! What is down should be up and what is up should be down. North is East and West is South. Yews is No. Bad is good. Sad is gay. Straight is crooked.

Please give it a bit longer...

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-03   17:39:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: rowdee (#9)

Isn't this phun?

buckeroo  posted on  2012-07-03   20:19:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: buckeroo (#12)

I think it can be fun, interesting, and educational, and probably a goodly number of other things. We can find people we can draw on their experiences from, or their education or ocupational backgrounds, etc.

I remember the early days at Free Republic when articles were found and dissected from one end to the other......that was great--we could learn how to read between the lines, detect spin, and the like.

I remember lots of vanity threads that were really meat and potato threads-- talks about liberty, justice, history, and the like. Back then, it even meant something to Jim Rob besides a gravy train. He could write a good commentary. Names like Jeff Head, OKW, Dawg, Don (was it Miller from northern Idaho), Askel5, And there was a fiesty gal--her name is on te tip of my tongue and I can't remember it at the moment. Aha! Mercuria!!!! Remember her, buck?

When i first got on the internet in '98, I would just sit and read all these people would write. I couldn't believe I had found people that felt the way I did about my country.

And what was neat--they didn't resort to gutter talk or potty mouths, they weren't into name calling or labeling as is done nowadays.

Thats what I consider fun.

I don't care who can scream 'dung' (shit to those in Rio Vista) the loudest from the top of the Eiffel Tower. That is just a childish stunt. Meant to draw attention. Meant to 'prove' someone's manhood or womanhood, I suppose.

I speak from having been on that side of the bar. My 3-year hiatus hopefully showed me I don't need that to make a point. It also has shown me I don't need that in my life.

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-04   0:39:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: rowdee (#15)

I remember the early days at Free Republic when articles were found and dissected from one end to the other......that was great--we could learn how to read between the lines, detect spin, and the like.

I remember lots of vanity threads that were really meat and potato threads-- talks about liberty, justice, history, and the like. Back then, it even meant something to Jim Rob besides a gravy train. He could write a good commentary. Names like Jeff Head, OKW, Dawg, Don (was it Miller from northern Idaho), Askel5, And there was a fiesty gal--her name is on te tip of my tongue and I can't remember it at the moment.

I remember some of those peeps...Askel5 was big on abortion, Jeff Head an articulate advocate for liberty and the Founders principles - "feisty gals"? Lol, there were plenty of them. Curiously enough, the moderation was mostly "self-moderating"...and there were no "Viking Kitties" or harpies, or thread police.

There was an aire of provocative honesty and principle abound - if there is such a thing. And a focus to turn around the partisan toxicity that was two terms of Bubba Inc that not only made a mockery of this Republic, but of the office of the Presidency.

That idealism seems almost quaintly naive reflecting back then for FR as well as for the country in general. 9/11 the so-called "War on Terror", Patriot Act, and "WMD" changed all that, didn't it?

Liberator  posted on  2012-07-04   22:08:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Liberator (#18)

Were you there when we had Fire Talk voice chat or Pal Talk? We had a lot of good conversation into the wee hours of the morning.

I remember sitting up many nights talking with Jim Rob--that was before he sold out and went from the 'never in a million years would I vote for W, to if anyone doesn't support them they can get the hell off my site' attitude.

I remember being on the board the night he did that. Someone came on the thread I was on and said that JR was now supporting W...most all of us thought that was a humdinger of a rumor.....so I went to the thread where that allegedly took place and asked JR bluntly and he said yes.

I will forever and always believe that Bob J was involved in that mess...the board was never the same after that and folks started leaving. Some time before that some of the libertarians started a board, and also John Deere did Liberty _______; and then, somewhere in the mix, Goldi started hers. Lucianne Goldberg had a website and some people went there.

I finally asked him to delete my account after I had been gone for some time, as I didn't want to be considered as one of their 'members' for numerical counting/bragging.

We started a lot of projects over there, did a lot of research, and were a factor in getting some legislation/regulations killed. I really enjoyed the researching projects I was involved with. Made some neat friends.

rowdee  posted on  2012-07-05   1:16:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

#20. To: rowdee (#19)

Were you there when we had Fire Talk voice chat or Pal Talk? We had a lot of good conversation into the wee hours of the morning.

Morning - NO. I'm still a Zombie then. I'll betcha some great brain-storms were created then. Be nice if they were archived.

I remember sitting up many nights talking with Jim Rob--that was before he sold out and went from the 'never in a million years would I vote for W, to if anyone doesn't support them they can get the hell off my site' attitude.

I remember being on the board the night he did that. Someone came on the thread I was on and said that JR was now supporting W...most all of us thought that was a humdinger of a rumor.....so I went to the thread where that allegedly took place and asked JR bluntly and he said yes.

Really? You and JR??

Well, there IS this archive that's survived:

JimRob (regarding W Bush):

“Well, by God, if you people insist on electing another cokehead as President, you damned well better throw open all the prison cell doors and free every man, woman, and child you’re holding on drug charges. And if you’re gonna elect another drug felon as President, you’d better rescind each and every one of your unconstitutional drug laws now on the books, including all of your unconstitutional search and seizure laws, and your asset forfeiture laws, and your laws that enable your unconstitutional snooping into our bank accounts and cash transactions. Well, I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. You people are sick! Conservatives my ass. You people are nothing but a bunch of non-thinking hypocrits! You’re a shame and a disgrace to the Republic! And, I, for one, am tired of taking orders from cokeheads and felons! Elect another one and I’ll tell you what. I’ll be ready for war! It’ll be time to take up arms and run the filthy lying bastards out!”

2 Posted on 08/20/1999 03:19:31 PDT by Jim Robinson

I will forever and always believe that Bob J was involved in that mess...the board was never the same after that and folks started leaving. Some time before that some of the libertarians started a board, and also John Deere did Liberty _______; and then, somewhere in the mix, Goldi started hers. Lucianne Goldberg had a website and some people went there.

I finally asked him to delete my account after I had been gone for some time, as I didn't want to be considered as one of their 'members' for numerical counting/bragging.

You mean after JR suddenly turned around on a dime, you bailed? COMPLETELY? It was indeed a huge betrayal - how then could he be trusted after backing off completely on his word? His cred took a beating with that turnabout over Dubya, that's for sure. I wasn't posting much at the time, but noticed to upheaval and mood affectation. Of course there were the splintering into other forums. Lucy's grew large, LP became a small forum but beacon of savvy posters - a far cry from recent years.

BobJ...I can't say I even knew who he was...until his last days at FR during which he was instigating and getting banned (and also subsequent subject of a pretty funny Hitler Parody here at LP). It seemed to me by examining his post that he was...VERY moderate and NO conservative by any stretch. he could very well have influenced JR's future moderate, pro-RINO, Dubya sycophancy positions.

We started a lot of projects over there, did a lot of research, and were a factor in getting some legislation/regulations killed. I really enjoyed the researching projects I was involved with. Made some neat friends.

FR and you guys did do yeoman's work; It truly was very politically influential and made a difference. Shame about the steady devolution and what seemed to be pimping for Dubya, endorsing ALL his RINO policies. I assumed that he'd been nicely compensated by 2002, 2003.

Liberator  posted on  2012-07-05 01:48:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com